63 Replies to “Saturday Evening Reflection on the Kavanaugh Circus”

    1. Why should that bother the Dumbocrats? Actual facts haven’t mattered to them so far.

  3. Good video btw, but she is way to nice about Ford. In a just society worthless, vile, cynical character assassins like Ford would be publicly flogged.

    1. Don’t get hung up on the age inappropriate demeanor; it’s the manipulation.
      When a person remembers a place they have been, they make involuntary eye and head movements, the analyst pointed it out because CBF wasn’t testifying from memory, like a normal person. Instead, she was reciting a carefully contrived narrative. The dog that didn’t bark, is that she never made an assertion that could be corroborated or cross checked. Everyone will have to decide for themselves if they think that is consistent with a genuine and sincere victim.

    2. That was a very believable body language and memory recall breakdown. All I can say is that as a HUMAN being … my inner DNA fired off the exact same … pretty-pose, baby-talk WARNING!!! Her … ACT … set off every internal alarm pre-programmed into my DNA. We humans, have a highly evolved innate alarm system to WARN us of danger from predators. This genetic coding is what keeps us alive to procreate. This woman is an Actor. A crisis Actor. I don’t believe a word she said. I don’t believe anything ever happened to this woman … that she didn’t instigate and welcome herself. It’s all rubbish.

      1. K
        Of course, I knew it when she didn’t move that string of hair from her eyes, in the first 10 seconds. Who does that?

        I posted yesterday in another thread here, so not to repeat myself, I’ll say now that I saw her whole testimony and tried to give her the benefit of the doubt. Essentially, her lawyers gave her away with the pro bono statement after she said she was paying them through a go-fund-me method. Holy Shucks!

        1. Reading the comments under this video … it appears as though WOMEN believe her testimony was an “act” far quicker than men. Women’s internal female bullshit meter/Radar is more finely tuned than men. Probably goes back to your primal girl-fighting to mate with the strongest male in the tribe.

          1. K:

            Yes probably, you make a good point.

            It’s in the eyes.You could see she had a small twinkle when she talked to a man, yet when she talked to a woman she had a sort of blank, indifferent, non-flirtatious stare. It was very unprofessional of her to do this, in this setting. A man’s life and reputation are at stake.

          2. kenji, wimin compete WITH other wimin, they compete FOR the men. That is the reason for women’s ultra sensitive BS meter:-)))

          3. 666 … that’s EXACTLY correct. You can’t argue with millions of years of evolution … establishing a successful reproductive strategy for the species. (hint: I’m not a biblical literalist).

      2. I call it good ole Street Sense. When you hang in the streets and the shady bars playing pool in your youth you better learn body language. Once your wise to it you never forget the feeling you get when IT’S JUST NOT RIGHT.

    2. We are reasonably certain he never raped anyone. We are also reasonably certain that no matter who got nominated, dhimicrats would always, at the last minute, discover some victim of something somewhere sometime decades ago. We are also reasonably certain that calling you a scumbag is an insult to bags full of scum.

        2. They missed an opportunity. They weren’t sufficiently desperate to try to shovel that bullshit? The elections weren’t around the corner? The “Me Too” hysteria wasn’t as rampant as it is now?
          Why are you such a scumbag Andy?

        4. Because there was no chance they could delay the process to the mid terms.

          This all started when the mid term polling started to look very good for the Dems. The Dems realized that if they could delay long enough that they would get to control who replaces kennedy.

          They don’t give a damn about ford and her issues. They don’t care about due process.

          They want power.

          That’s why graham and many many others are so mad and are genuinely fearful that the Dems are taking us down the road to totalitarianism.

          There lie the gulags…

          1. zerohedge and some other sites have reported that Christine Blasey Ford’s father and brother are or have been with the CIA. (Similar to Obama.)

    4. To even utter that line of utter garbage makes YOU a rapist, Andrew. You are ass-raping a demonstrably GOOD man … Judge Brett Kavanaugh. You should have listened to Dennis Prager … and you’d have recognized yourself as a rapist. The Supreme Court isn’t your own personal Bath House you nasty little buggerer. You and your kind need to be locked-up.

      1. You beat me to it Kenji, I came across similar information that the Andrew troll is indeed a proven buggerer of little boys. I happen to know this is FACT and that he is terrified that his family will find out. All the posts he has made to this point on SDA prove he is a cold-blooded child rapist.

        There is, quite simply, absolutely no doubt of this. He better stay the hell away from boys basketball teams.

        BTW, anyone who disagrees with this opinion must be a HATER of LITTLE BOYS.

    5. I guess six FBI investigations for all his previous high profile positions aren’t enough to suss out wether someone is a certified sexual predator and gang rapist. Best make it seven, right fool?

    6. Christ himself could been nominated and they would accuse him of gang rape.
      Look at the facts next time before you open your mouth.
      You are condemning a man based on accusation alone. How disgusting is that?

        1. I somehow think His stance on perversion, corruption, adultery and sin would have landed him instead on the wrong side of a twitter mob and a flash mob doxxing.

          4. “To me being a gangster was better than being president of the United States.”

            The last one was both.

    7. It is the leaders of the globalist movement who routinely gangrape and murder children at the orgies they attend on private islands, Andrew.

      It is they who dream of the happy day they will be free to rape children openly.

      And it is they who betray little girls, and then as adults turn them against good, decent men who threaten to thwart their plans.

      I look forward to the Kavanaugh Supreme Court’s stripping homosexual pornography and propaganda of First Amendment protection, restoring the legal understanding of marriage as between a man and a woman and “gay marriage” as fraudulent, restoring the right to life of the unborn–and declaring the lives of abortionists and women who kill their children forfeit.

      The reign of perverts is at an end, Andrew.

    8. PS Andrew … Grassley has formally requested the FBI and Justice Dept. to investigate and prosecute obstruction of justice and filing false statements against the “gang rapist accuser”. The recanter of his false gang rape accusation … is about to be JAILED for LYING to Congress. So much so that DiFi even questioned Judge Kavanaugh about those FALSE charges.

      And I hope the FBI uncover the entire web of sick in the head leftist activists who had a role in propagating these knowingly FALSE smears and accusations against Judge Kavanaugh. “By ANY means necessary”, eh Andrew. Two can play that game.

    9. “Maybe Mr. Trump should’ve nominated someone who we can be reasonably certain never gang raped anyone?”

      Andrew, here’s a hint….

      The democrats sat on this for weeks…so they could look into every detail of it
      ..do you think for one second if the democrats could have had him arrested for anything they would have passed up that chance?

      The democrats don’t even believe her story…….
      ..and that’s why they are using the court of opinion
      and not a court of law

  6. Check out the opening skit of S.N.L. it features the topic du jour, in the season opener of the 2018-2019 season.

    Matt Damon does a cameo appearance imitating Brett Kavanaugh. It is brilliant. In the skit they mention Soros, how shocking… this from NBC…!

    1. Colonialista: Holy mackerel…it doesn’t *occur* to those pale faces how truly bonkers they are…:)

  8. Wow! How selective can (fake) outrage be?
    Where were the women screaming at Trudeau in the elevator?
    Yelling at Slick Willie?
    Defiling the memorial services for Ted Kennedy?

  9. The people who seek to normalize every perversion known to man,some how are “offended” by an alleged grope?
    Were it not for double standards our Progressive comrades would have no standards at all.
    Such slander shall not go unrewarded.
    We shall hold these creatures to their own rules.
    Such rich entertainment only occurs once per cycle,we are repeating 1770s France with new toys and same old roles.

    Civil society is collapsing under the parasitic load of professional “helpers”.
    We either cull the herd of useless destroyers or we go the way of Zimbabwe,Venezuela where toilet paper becomes the new currency.
    And the cull becomes easier to stomach every tax year.

    Now the fools and bandits seek to destroy rule of law,take away presumption of innocence and return to mob justice..
    they already refer to us as ignorant deplorables,they complain about our “Clinging to God& Guns” and then they insist only they are qualified to do our thinking for us.
    Sane persons learn to be slow to anger,however that anger once justified is relentless and long.
    Avoiding this state is one reason conservatives are considered so politically pathetic.

    Our Progressive Comrades have had enough rope,every place they have held sustained power are impoverished,lawless festering hellholes, every word they have spoken has been demonstrated by their actions as a lie.
    By any means possible means they have finally taken off the mask, does this mean they now believe society is so corrupt that they can come clean?
    If you do not have law and order complete with property rights, creative people do not build permanent structures.
    Your makers vanish,all theft is permissible and starvation will follow.

      1. Agreed, John gets the pervasive and insidious effect of progressivism, which is actually Marxism, which has been morphed within the Democrat party as fascist, which is authoritarianism replete with graded rights according to political favour.

        The left is reduced to arguing Judge Kavanagh has no rights to due process because this “isn’t a trial,” without bothering to say what it is, all begging their questions of why they can’t convict Judge Kavanagh based on their “feelings.”

        That is precisely how they want to rule, by feelings, with them deciding which feelings are important or relevant.

        Hint: Judge Kavanagh’s “feelings” are irrelevant. Society demanding fairness, regardless of the form, is unimportant.

        The bottom line is they don’t have to justify themselves. If you disagree then they will frame you and make you prove your innocence to their satisfaction; iow you will be found guilty and therefore an enemy to civic society.

        Civil society disappears, the reference of the atomized individual turns to the state, is not bounded around rights, but connection to the rulers. All will exist for the benefit of the state, which exists for the benefit of the neo-despots.

        Cuba, with it’s free but non-existent health care, Zimbabwe, Haiti, Venezuela, Greece, New York, California, now the US.

        These are the inevitable, inescapable consequences of state fascism – no individual rights, your safety is state purview.

        The Kavanagh debacle has exposed that green little creature called political envy, they don’t even try to hid it anymore.

  10. Ford was deliberately evasive in all her answers, obviously to negate any possible perjury charges. Diane Fartstain had the information for over a month and “withheld from investigators.” Isn’t this corruption of justice? Expel her from the Senate before the vote.

    1. Did you check out her “passed polygraph” test?

      She scratched out some notes, which btw didn’t mention Kavanagh (first mentioned in July/18 despite recovered memories, letters to politicians, discussions with beach friends, and “therapist” notes not mentioning his name).

      As for the polygraph, after she wrote her statement (again folks no mention of Kavanagh) she was asked only two questions.

      “The test examiner asked Ford to write down a description of what happened to her at a high school party in the early 1980s, where she claims a drunken teenage Kavanaugh groped her and tried to remove her clothing while pinning her to a bed and covering her mouth.” (One more time, KAVANAGH’S NAME WAS NOT MENTIONED)

      “After interviewing her about her statement, the examiner asked her a pair of yes-or-no questions about the written narrative.”

      ‘Is any part of your statement false?’ he asked, followed by: ‘Did you make up any part of your statement?’ Ford answered ‘no’ to both questions.

      The report doesn’t mention questions about any specific parts of her story.”

      The polygraph examiner wrote that her two responses were ‘not indicative of deception,’ and that the chance she was lying was a tiny fraction of one per cent.”

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6211925/Christine-Ford-passed-Kavanaugh-polygraph-test-lawyers-REFUSE-hand-therapy-notes.html

      Let me see is that how law enforcement does polygraph tests: just give us handwritten statement telling us why you’re innocent, without mentioning the crime, then we ask: “are you sure about this? You are, OK you’re believed.

      Oh right, I forgot it’s “wrong” to questions Dr. Ford’s assertions because she “believes” them and some idiot Senator from Hawaii feels that’s enough to not only deny Judge Kavanagh the nomination, but to brand him a racist while destroying his character, reputation and life. There’s justice for you: DeMarxist fascist division.

      She needs to be re-interviewed, which the FBI is, and her polygraph results can be backed up with a proper polygraph.

  11. The besty female friend not backing her up…on a sexual assault charge…that killed it for me.

    1. • Steve you say : “The female friend not backing her up…”

      • And from Phil on September 28th @ 6:36 am said:
      …she ” slipped out of the house without talking to or warning her friend who was now left as the only remaining female in a house with rapists and murderers! Quite the friend she is!”

      Gentlemen, that is exactly what I thought, when I heard this. Normally, friends do not run out on each other, especially females. People usually hung around with people the same age, at the tender age of 15. This scenario as described by Ms Ford is utterly unbelievable. Why didn’t the so called friend see her leave and go after her, to see why she was leaving? Another question unanswered.

      The lawyer questioning Ms Ford did a poor job, no timelines were established, her questions were poorly thought out. She has to have flunked the Bar Exams several times. They could’ve got someone better than her. I do think that getting a female lawyer was a good idea though. As a matter of fact, it was an excellent idea. The old male Republicans would’ve looked too creepy with their questions. Gosh, this must’ve disappointed the Democrats. Ha!

      1. Apparently Dr. Ford’s friend has “medical issues” and/or was in the basement of the house of which she doesn’t know the location, while she was being attacked at a date and time she doesn’t know.

        Do the other “witnesses” who also repudiate her have “medical issues” as well that obviate their testimony?

        Does Dr. Ford have “medical issues” that prevent her from accurately recounting her trauma?

        I believe that woman was traumatized, first by whomever assaulted her, then by the Dem fascists who could care less what happens to her, who outed her with an illegal leak, for which they will be outed imho.

        But, Kavanagh is not responsible for either event. People who feel he should be denied due process, especially those who argue that is permissible because of his “opinions,” are nothing more than fascists; and fascists must have an outgroup which eventually becomes the entire population due to their political violence and alienation.

        No matter the actual facts, it has simply not been demonstrated by a balance of probabilities (more probable than not), the Judge Kavanagh assaulted her. It is improbable given the facts on record thus far.

        1. Reader discretion advisory-

          The friend was in the basement, you say. I somehow missed that fact. All the more reason for Ms Ford to have let sleeping dogs be left sleeping then. No witnesses. Uh huh, and George Soros is Santa Claus.

          A lot of people sure are going to a lot of trouble to get revenge on Brett Kavanaugh for being a lawyer who worked for Ken Starr to get Bill Clinton impeached. That’s what this is all about. How ironic everything is about women and sex. If Monica would have swallowed, none of these threats to Brett Kavanaugh would’ve been a reality.

          He might’ve been just a Mall Lawyer doing Real Estate closings, Wills, Family Law, Personal Injury Litigation Counsel … and he’d be coaching basketball.

          Please pardon the unprincipled and unusual descriptive language here-In.

  12. The second accuser fails the corroboration test, too.

    23 Sep 2018Washington, DC25,165
    WASHINGTON, DC – The second woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of inappropriate drunken behavior, Deborah Ramirez, admits “significant gaps in her memories” regarding the college party in question. Critics note her allegations come after six days of consulting with a Democratic lawyer, other persons she claims were at the party deny her account, and even her college best friend admits, “I never heard of it.”
    Despite focused efforts by Democratic political operatives and left-wing lawyer Debra Katz, the recent account of Christine Blasey Ford appears to be unraveling. Each of the four people she claimed to be present at a 1982 party where she claimed an intoxicated 17-year-old Kavanaugh groped her have either denied her account or said they have no knowledge of it.
    https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/23/ramirez-yale-classmates-deny-kavanaugh-allegations/

  13. one of my tenants pointed out ford passed a polygraph.
    I pointed out said gadget is inadmissible as evidence due to unacceptable error rates, plus with practice practice practice Im sure one can ‘shift’ the results to some desired measure.
    he had no response to that.
    I would dearly love the opportunity to try and trick a poly with questions that *I and I alone* know the truth, and thus at times lie and see if it ‘picked up’ on that.
    I would then by prior agreement disclose where the lies were and challenge the operators/fans/sheep/etc as
    ‘whaddaya think NOW asswipes???’

    these misfit devices have existed for decades, and yet, NO ONE has suggested such an experiment.
    “people believe what they want to believe” sums it up.

  14. How many bedroom doors have locks?
    How many guys in high school attempt to tag team a girl?
    How many 15 year girls get separated from each other at a party?
    How many girls wear a wet bathing suit under their clothes?
    How many 17 year boys from good homes get fall down drunk and nobody knows about it?
    Does every girl who had a boy try to get to first base suffer from PTS the rest of their lives?
    This whole story is a joke!!

    1. Oh but he put his hand over her mouth. She thought she was going to die. Along with Lady Justice as collateral damage.

      Check out this disgusting political cartoon, vile and plumbing a new low even for the hyper-shrill current debauchery.

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-cartoonist-explains-lady-justice-kavanaugh-piece-1.4844689?cmp=FB_Post_News

      Beneath contempt. These freaks have no soul, so sure of their own piety, partisan hypocrites every one one of them.

      There’s a special place in hell for this malevolent and immature political opportunism, human wreckage in its amoral wake.

      We don’t need the CBC. CNN, MSNBC and Morning Joe do it for free. You can defund the whole crew. Fascist pigs.

      1. Sandi Renaldo featured this Lady Justice cartoon piece from the Halifax cartoonist on the 11:00 pm CTV news.

        The Alinsky rule- if you repeat a lie often enough people will believe it. Sad to say I’ll be surprised if Kavanaugh gets the job. If he does he’ll be the newest 6 million dollar man, if he stays 30 years, till he’s in his early 80s.

        The lefty Press lies are so disgusting that they are difficult to watch on lefty TV.

  15. This is from the Althouse blog: Ig this hypothesis is true, Christine Blasey Ford has to be a sociopath.

    YW said…
    Ken B here is the comment I wrote last night in the “At the Saturday Cafe” thread. I wrote subsequent ones that address how she tried to prove it was 1982 during the hearing (a contrived effort, too), and how the date changes can explain the omission of how she got to the party and how she left, and why I think she told the story the way she did:

    One of the oddities of Ford’s story might be easily explained by the theory that the therapist’s notes were right all along, and Ford has not only been lying about it, but actively working around this inconvenient detail all along.

    The polygraph exam required Ford to write a statement, the veracity of which she was required to attest to during the exam. Now this was an exam she took on August 7th, if memory serves, a week after she had sent the letter to Eshoo and Feinstein naming Kavanaugh as her assailant, and in the “early 80s” (I will come back to this date description in a moment). However, in the hand written statement she was required to write for the polygraph exam, she does two very unusual things- (1) she doesn’t name Kavanaugh at all- it is a generic description of a potential sexual assault, and (2) she first wrote “early 80s”, then changed by crossing out the “early”, leaving the description of the time as simple “80s”.

    Why would she do these two seemingly inexplicable things in the polygraph statement- her story she is telling publicly is that it was Kavanaugh who attacked her, and it occurred in the “early 80s”. If she is telling the truth, then the statement for the polygraph should have had both Kavanaugh’s name and the unredacted “early 80s”, but she not only omits Kavanaugh’s name, but actively edits her own writing on the general date. At first, I couldn’t explain this, but then someone reminded me of the therapist’s notes and suddenly it is possible to make sense of this odd behavior. I have been working on the assumption that her entire story is a fabrication beginning to end, but if you give her the benefit of the doubt and accept the therapist’s notes as a true depiction of Ford’s assault, then you realize that she wrote the polygraph statement that way because it was the literal truth, but if she names Kavanaugh and keeps “early” next to 80s, then suddenly the statement isn’t the truth, but is, in fact, a lie, and she was afraid she would fail the exam if she had to attest to that.

    I defy you to come up with a better explanation for that polygraph statement- I can’t think of one.”
    9/30/18, 11:58 PM

    YW said…
    Remember how she tried to convince people that was 1982, because she “remembered” that it was before she had a driver’s license. That is curious construct to my ear, and I think she did that with a very specific purpose- so that she wouldn’t be asked if she drove to and from the party.

    She had a problem in reconstructing the story so that Kavanaugh could be in the frame- she had to explain her transportation. That is a problem because someone would have had to drive her there, and driver her back, and those people would be witnesses, and the second of them might be a witness who would remember driving home a distraught Chrissy Blasey. Note how Ford discounts Keyser’s lack of memory of this event – she points out correctly that the night wasn’t memorable from Keyser’s point of view (skipping over the fact that Keyser denied even knowing Kavanaugh). However, if she names someone driving her home, that argument isn’t as easily invoked if that witness also denies the story.

    All in all, the holes, the inconsistencies, and how I think Ford tried to deal with them- especially the therapist’s notes, her only supporting witness of any kind, leads me to believe that Ford framed Kavanaugh for her assault. The above combined with the testimony Thursday convinces me that she is a cunning liar, but not a particularly good one at doing it on camera- under questioning, she kept making small errors, and you see that also in that written lie detector statement where she edits her own story to make it fit what the therapist had recorded in 2012 as closely as possible.
    10/1/18, 12:16 AM

    YW said…
    KenB, I had read that earlier this evening- I note this part:

    “While it is common for victims to be uncertain about dates, Dr. Ford failed to explain how she was suddenly able to narrow the timeframe to a particular season and particular year”

    I think she and her lawyers worked on it using Mark Judge’s books which are autobiographical and describe his high school years. I think when she first started this endeavor, she wasn’t sure how old Kavanaugh or, more likely, didn’t know what year he graduated. More importantly, she couldn’t risk nailing down a season and year until resources had been spent at least giving a rough outline where Kavanaugh was during his Summers in 1982 and 1983. Though it wasn’t revealed at the hearing because no one cared, I would be very curious to find out if Kavanaugh was in Maryland in the Summer of 1983, or was he doing an internship that Summer before college? It could explain why 1982 was finally selected. As for 1982 itself, I think they carefully read Judge’s book, and decided the details included could add some meat to the bones of her story. The entire Safeway tangent just sounds terribly contrived to me, like a really bad lie.
    10/1/18, 12:58 AM

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation