37 Replies to “Break Them Up”

  1. But if conservatisms don’t like they can make their own Google instead of demanding censorship. And their own credit cards, and banks, and Internet.

    1. If you represent your service, or product, and a customer comes to you expecting what you said, and you unknown to the customer deliver some different, inferior, and and misleading product or service, that is fraud.
      If Google wants to lable/inform that it will not serve conservatives, fine. It is not fine, nor honest, to hide, switch, manipulate,
      Perhaps Google is too comfortable with the Chinese Communists and is just bringing its censorship back home.

    2. should conservatives also use different bathrooms and water fountains?

      would you tell blacks what you just told conservatives?

      Can’t you see Google, Facebook, Twitter and a few other ” giants” are taking not only the USA but North America into a new segregation age?

      but this time it is not blacks it is conservatives?

      1. Whoooosh!

        I was mocking idiots who argue “but twitter/google/facebook/youtube/mastercard/patreon are private enterprises blah blah blah censorship etc etc etc competition”. Thought that was obvious to anyone who weren’t an idiot themselves. “their own … Internet” should have been a giveaway.

  2. This is the kind of thing which can result in a big anti-trust case, on the scale of US vs. ATT, US vs. Microsoft. Amazon had better watch or it may end up in the same place.

    1. Would that it did. Google’s operatives are a much, much bigger threat to American elections and freedom than Russia. Google is the 5th column that undermines the country.

      1. This seems like the sort of thing one might do when they don’t want to make a deal, but don’t have the balls to just walk away.

        Good timing too, to be dissing the USA’s President … 9/11

        1. The timing of the conference is not accidental. As as far as progressives are concerned on 9/11 courageous oppressed fighters killed thousands of “little Eichmanns” in a desperate act of sacrifice to push back against tyrannical US imperialism. That is why we import them here by millions.

    1. Freeland really is a ridiculous front hole… calling President Trump a “tyrant” while negotiating a trade agreement with the US, savvy. I’m beginning to believe that Freeland is not just an ideological Soros twat, but she may also be insane, like the actor who portrays the PM, a couple of lunatics. Like Juthtin the Molester neither care one bit for this country. Even worse than the insults of Pres. Trump are the proposals that “populism” must be stopped, coming from a globalist fascist lump of excrement like Freeland the notion that “populism” must be stomped out should have everyone worried. What is the globalists plan for stomping out decent of forced entropy?

      1. All my life, lefties were always for any “Popular Front, the people, the workers, etc”. But Canadian, American “Peoples”? Rural peasantry? Industrial hammer and forge? Farmers?. No.

        1. It’s necessary for the left to destroy the “old” (i. e., everything) in order to build the new, ideal socialist (i. e., communist) state, which will be perfect, just, blah blah blah.

          It worked so well in places such as the U. S. S. R., the Warsaw Pact countries, and Cambodia, didn’t it?

        1. Every time Lyin Brian opens his pie-hole he confirms that he was a Liberal Manchurian Candidate in the PC Party of Canada when he was PM.

          I remember the F-18 maintenance contract back stab he gave Winnipeg.

  3. I hope all the tech giant CEO’s like the 80% income tax rates the new group of socialist Democrats would impose if they got elected. Oh and don’t forget wealth tax. Say 1% of all your assets each year. Oh and finally a 20 to 25% sales tax (oops they call it a Value Added Tax)

    1. You joking? Under Obama they were excused taxes entirely.

      As they see it, the job of governments is to kill their competitors in the cradle, not tax them.

  4. This seems like a good moment to mention Google’s market share.

    That it’s not as though this is the Globe and Mail, or TorStar endorsing the Liberal Party. Or a regional powerhouse where another may dominate.
    This is everywhere, all the time, and the majority cited search engine in all countries of the world that are connected to the internet. They drop search results to page 5 for sites they don’t endorse, and swill from CNN to the front (for example).

    So it affects opinions far more widespread than readers of the Globe and Mail, or the CBC.

    http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share

    1. It is worse than that chart shows.
      Virtually every alternative search engine is in some way dependant on results from google, as being an effective search engine really requires a backup copy of the internet.

  5. “FNC’s Tucker Carlson, on his Monday show, first broke the story that a Google e-mail chain revealed Google’s Multicultural Marketing department head Eliana Murillo admitted to using Google’s “political power” to help turn out Hispanic voters for Hillary Clinton.

    None of the network morning shows (ABC’s Good Morning America, CBS This Morning, NBC’s Today) spent any time on this shocking development.

    However, on this morning’s edition of Good Morning America, correspondent Tara Palmeri did find time to advance Google’s spin that they didn’t favor any party in their searches. During an interview with Donald Trump Jr, Palmeri turned to Google to knock down the president’s sons’s concerns about the tech company’s biases: ”

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2018/09/11/censored-network-morning-shows-blackout-bombshell-report-google

  6. Heh, conservatives didn’t used to run to daddy gov’t to fix things for them…feeling cursed yet? 🙂

    Jer 17:5  Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD. 

    1. Not looking for government to fix this, looking for government to do what they are good at and break them. If some group tried to overthrow the country by military force, we would expect government to break them, so when silicon valley tries to overthrow the country, then government should break them, even if they are doing it by stealth rather than force.

  7. Google’s lastest nonsense does not surprise me at all. I never use google as a search engine – I only use DuckDuckGo (it took a short while to get to know how to use it), which does not track its users (unlike google – a main reason why I do not use it).

    But, I use google chrome on my desktop PC, and Safari on my MacBook Air.

    1. Oh Terrence, and google still tracks you, even though you don’t use it!!!! So does fakebook, yahoo and a couple of others

      1. Yep. NoScript is good at helping you to block a lot of the tracking scripts. There’s no one tool that gives you complete protection and still leaves the Internet functionally usable.

  8. Anti-trust? How about nationalization? Make the champagne socialists play by their own rules. Confiscate their ill-gotten gains and put them to work on the chain-gang, doing the back-breaking farm work they insist white people won’t do. It’ll be the first honest work most of them ever did in their lives. That’s what they want for us. Give them a taste of their own medicine, while good men see to it the Internet stops being another means for globalist swine to lie to people.

  9. I could care less that GOOGLE tried to get Clinton elected. What I do care about is the blatant violation of Election Laws as this is very obviously an In-Kind donation/contribution to the Clinton campaign. Both GOOGLE and Clinton broke the law in a major fashion due to the dollar value you could put on the In-Kind contribution. We’re talking seven (potentially more) figures in services based on the equipment, facilities and services rendered.

    In addition to violating election laws. They, also, violated Treasury laws, as this is a reportable and taxable service.

  10. Be careful what you wish for. The last thing we need is governments regulating and/or nationalizing the internet. When the left gains political power, (which they frequently do) they will simply turn those same tools against conservatives and we will have no real argument against it.

  11. ” they will simply turn those same tools against conservatives and we will have no real argument against it.”

    How would that be any worse than today?

  12. There is a “lot of fear within Google”….(poor babies!) They will stand up for “their values”…

    “VP for Global Affairs Kent Walker argues that supporters of populist causes like the Trump campaign are motivated by ‘fear, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.’

    Later, Walker says that Google should fight to ensure the populist movement – not just in the U.S. but around the world – is merely a ‘blip’ and a ‘hiccup’ in a historical arc that ‘bends toward progress.’

    CEO Sundar Pichai states that the company will develop machine learning and A.I. to combat what an employee described as ‘misinformation’ shared by ‘low-information voters.’ ”

    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/

Navigation