8 Replies to “Deep Impact”

  1. This is hilariously funny.
    “Trump’s values are hostile to conservatism,” the editorial board wrote.
    And the paper is pretending that Hillary’s are friendly to conservatism? Seems this paper richly deserves all the darts thrown at it by its readers.

  2. On the eve of Obama’s 2008 victory, I turned to my family and said, the pendulum is going to swing left. When he is through it will swing even further right, it will be a reactionary election in response to Obama.

  3. What makes this election different is how ‘in bed’ with Hillary most of the press is, and the potential for election fraud, partly due to the control the big tech corporations and George Soros have. (George Soros is now aiding our own, easily manipulated prime minister.) The way to combat those forces is by grassroots involvement and communication (Drudge, Breitbart, Alex Jones and the blogs!) CNN edits videos to try to save Hillary, but Americans are aware of what they’re doing. This election is going to be a nail-biter!

  4. I think that this time the MSM sales Gurus aren’t going to make a difference.
    Old Story:
    A large multinational dog food company decided to come out with the latest and greatest dog food.
    They had their researchers design the most nutritious combination of ingredients, containing all the essential vitamins and amino acids required by dogs.
    They marketing department put together a slick colorful advertisement and a catchy jingle for their TV commercial. Oodles of money was spent on TV advertising and splashy full page magazine ads.
    The packaging department designed a beautiful box for it.
    Every supermarket and pet food chain had shelf space devoted to the dog food.
    It did not sell.
    The CEO ordered a board meeting to discover why.
    He asked each department “Why isn’t our dog food selling?”
    The research department said there couldn’t possibly be anything wrong with their formulation. Marketing was completely stumped. The sales force was mystified. No one had a clue as to what was wrong.
    Finally, after a long pause, a new employee sitting in the back of the room finally got courage to say,
    “But the dogs don’t like it!”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYJdFutL_yY

  6. And if you go to the sub-linked original Poynter report of the story, you’ll notice the paper doesn’t say how many subscribers it lost and the Poynter journalist didn’t ask them for that number even it that query might have gone unanswered. So they’re not even being honest in their reporting about how people no longer trust them for being dishonest.

  7. Dallas Morning News: “sometimes principle comes at a cost,”
    Evidently the cost seemed affordable enough to the Clinton team.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation