Y2Kyoto: Launch of the RFS Planetary Fever

The return of the Russian icebreakers.

The new ship is a 6,000 ton (deadweight), 85 meter (180 foot) long vessel that can handle ice up to a meter thick. Meanwhile Russia is building three Artika class nuclear powered icebreakers. These are much larger (173 meters long and 33,500 tons) vessels that can handle ice three meters thick. With a crew of 75, Artika class ships can stay at sea for up to six months at a time. Currently Russia has the largest icebreaker fleet (41 ships), followed by Finland (seven), Sweden and Canada (six each) and the United States (five).

21 Replies to “Y2Kyoto: Launch of the RFS Planetary Fever”

  1. Polar 8. Canada needs nuclear; nuclear power, nuclear naval vessels (subs, ice breakers). Too bad cult programming in public education teaches anti-nuclear Lysenkoism so successfully.

  2. What a waste of money! What’s wrong with those Russians? Arctic ice is disappearing, they should be de-commissioning icebreakers, not building new ones.

  3. Well, the sun has gone cold (Solar cycle activity lowest in 200 years, blank as a billiard ball they say) and ENSO has switched to La Nina.
    Both are associated with a cooler earth but neither will stop our fraudulent proggy governments from stepping up to the challenge of global warming by attacking CO2.
    So we will face cold, killer winters as the greenies destroy our ability to affordably heat our homes.
    The Green Reaper rides again.
    The environmentalist movement is quickly catching Communism as the deadliest ideology the earth has ever seen.

  4. I am unsure why we would need more than one icebreaker accessible to the Western Arctic and one accessible to the Eastern Arctic. We should post a restricted shipping season that does not include a full sailing of the Northwest Passage and anyone who gets stuck should suffer Franklin’s fate or pay the full cost of rescue.

  5. They’ll just “plot” temperatures however necessary to fantasize new heat records.

  6. The commies created the environmentalist movement. Notice there is no environmental movement to speak of in Russia.
    Scar, our ability to access and service people who live up north is related to the claim that they are Canadians living on Canadian territory. These people aren’t much different, culturally and probably not linguistically, than the ones who live in northern Russia.
    If we can navigate the north passage only part of the year and Russia can do it year round then they can begin to claim, plausibly, that this territory is Russian.

  7. How many seals,orcas,whales,porpoises,and polar bears are these ice breakers killing off? Where are all the limp wristed animal rights activists? Coffee in Vancouver? With Greenpeace? Hypocritical aholes.

  8. Is it true that the new Liberal government has commissioned a new icebreaker?
    It’s to be called HMC Zoolander, and is a canoe with a guy with a ball peen hammer in the bow.

  9. You don’t need icebreakers to rescue all those drowning polar bears.

  10. Well … not exactly … you see, Russian ICE IS much thicker than US/CANADA ice … because there are lots fewer cars on Russian Roads.
    At least that’s what I read in Mother Jones magazine …

  11. OMG !! I actually READ that load of tripe that you linked. And I LOVE how LEFTIST eco-FRAUDS are really good at sloganeering. The article warned of the dreaded “BLUE OCEAN” event. Smh … it reminds me of the “CHINA SYNDROME” … an insipid FEAR MONGERING slogan that spawned a mindless Hollywood movie that DESTROYED Nuclear Power in America. Sadly, our voters get ALL their information from Steven Spielberg and/or Comedy Central … I cannot WAIT to see the “BLUE OCEAN” eco-disaster movie. God help us.
    We are SO DOOMED. These IDIOTS cannot work hard-enough to TEAR IT ALL DOWN … maaaaaan. Everything that so many BRILLIANT people built over so many generations … RIPPED DOWN in a single lifetime.

  12. I will simplify for all those who don’t want to face reality. if you can’t defend your territory you can’t keep that territory and with Canada’s lack of desire we will not keep the arctic. in fact we will not keep Canada the way we are going.

  13. And why should we keep it? Didn’t Barry’s buddy say in the election that we’re a post-national country?
    By the way, just was *is* a post-national country? Where I went to school, country and nation were interchangeable terms. Does that mean that we’re a country but not a country? Or was that simply electoral gibberish that was designed to show how smart that quantum computing expert was?

  14. 85 meters is closer to 280 feet than 180 feet.
    Only icebreaker in Canada I ever heard of was the venerable Sir.John A. MacDonald, named after a popular Toronto Maple Leaf, which a neighbour of ours worked on as a steam engineer in the early 1960’s, out of Churchill, which was also named after a Toronto Maple Leaf.
    http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/Icebreaking/home
    The CCG claims we have a total of 15 icebreakers in 3 classes,all named after hockey players or politicians.
    Next year we are going to lay the keel for the CCGS Justin Trudeau,if a suitable Quebec shipbuilder can be found, hopefully one that employ lots ‘a Muslims.
    I said when Justin won the election,that Putin would make moves on the Canadian Arctic oil within six months, but the treacherous Russkie has left me in the lurch.

  15. “…named after a popular Toronto Maple Leaf, which a neighbour of ours worked on as a steam engineer in the early 1960’s …”
    The Leafs had steam powered players back then? And they haven’t won a Stanley Cup since 1967. I think I’ve figured out where they went wrong…

  16. Remember, the Shiny Pony said that he’d “stare down” Putin. I guess that’s why Vlady hasn’t made his move yet. The poor guy in the Kremlin must be shaking in his boots at the thought of it.

  17. With the north coast more frequently ice free in warm weather Russia sees a need for … ICEBREAKERS

Navigation