The Market-State Concept Revisited

Richard Fernandez;

A world where Angela Merkel feels compelled to accept millions of migrants for Europe even to the detriment of Germany and where president Obama feels he can sign major international treaties with Iran without reference to Congress is an unstable world locked in a game that is no longer transparent. Who do politicians work for? It creates a world of dubious loyalties and unpredictable coalitions.
If the obvious conflict of interest has been ignored by the politicians, it has not been lost on the voters. Many plainly sense what economists call an principal-agent problem, which may be the source of the current voter revolt.

17 Replies to “The Market-State Concept Revisited”

  1. “…which may be the source of the current voter revolt”
    What voter revolt?
    The elections, re-elections, and continued tolerance of the likes of Merkel, Obammy, turdo la doo, Wynne, Dildo McDinky, and a host of other parasites is proof positive that there is no revolt left in our dull, cowardly, western populations.
    If there was such a thing as revolt, the downtown cores of capital cities would have been plugged with concerned and angry voters demanding the resignation of these arseholes a long time ago.

  2. Bhaaaaaaaa. As Mr.MacMaster notes,what revolt? Maybe there will be some upset plebes when Alberta can no longer keep transfer payments going to Ontariowe,thanks to Nutley and her crew of thieves. Think I will keep my bucks under the mattress. We as a country are so fubared.

  3. “Maybe there will be some upset plebes when Alberta can no longer keep transfer payments going to Ontariowe,thanks to Nutley and her crew of thieves.”
    Alberta makes no transfer payments to Ontario at all. Zilch. The Federal Government makes all those payments.
    Transfer payments to provinces are sourced from Federal tax revenues which come from individuals and corporations regardless of their location in Canada. A wealthy person in Charlottetown will contribute more taxes than poor person in Calgary. But as there are obviously more wealthy people in Alberta than PEI, Canada receives more tax revenues by far from residents of the former.
    Who knows? At some point, perhaps Alberta will be following Ontario’s inglorious lead and receiving equalization payments too. Then maybe you can blame Nutley for mishandling your economy (even though the key culprit is the current price of a barrel of crude).
    Let’s hope not. It’s bad enough Ontario has sunk so low to receive such payments; Alberta getting them too would really signal that we’re in trouble as a country.

  4. This is actually an interesting article. It explains a lot about Obama – how any actions he takes that are not for immediate political gain always seem to be against the US and for foreign interests.
    It explains the EU and Merkel’s welcome of a (suicidal) influx of economic immigrants (they don’t even pretend to screen for true refugees).
    It explains Justin’s quip that Canada is a “post-national country”. Not that I expect him to understand what he’s saying … but that his coterie of handlers and lobbyists DO believe in this sh*t; they hope to make money out of it.
    I remember the fall of the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall; of the high hopes for a better future and “end of history”. It was a foolish idea then; it’s proven to be disastrous in the present.

  5. Classic Libtard delusion.
    We shall enjoy the fruits of civilization by destroying the foundations upon which our civilization depends.
    National borders matter, except to parasites and destroyers.
    Human nature is, there are people who will kill you for a sandwich.
    For questioning their will or their ideology.
    Without an agreed upon area where our values can be enforced, we cannot enjoy these values.
    Enforced being the operative word, fools and bandits do not act with enlightened self interest, do unto others as you would have them do unto you means nothing to self centred instant gratification types.
    That a trading elite would rule the world, transcending national borders and all would be wonderful.. denies human nature.
    Amazing how persons who could not run a fruit stand, are somehow capable of imposing their standards onto the world, that these self appointed elites know better than you and I how we shall live our lives and direct our efforts.
    Such arrogant ignorance does not go unrewarded.
    It is not a revolt, yet.
    We are in the withdrawal of services stage, where productive people sit back, do just enough or take on a government position.
    The Kleptocracy is firmly established, revolt is hard work and dangerous.
    A slow collapse and disintegration is already underway.
    Contempt for law,rules and regulation are already widespread.
    The unofficial economy grows with each new government theft.
    When you can take cash at 50% of the rate of a properly invoiced job and profit.. The cost of government is excessive and self destructive.
    Our national unit of exchange is devaluing at an appreciable rate, Canadian Tire money will soon be worth more.
    This does not help trade, but will encourage traders to use some other unit as trade must go on.
    Batter being the most basic, bit coin the more flexible.
    As for the current punishments for defying the thieves.
    Seizure of your property, imprisonment, fines.death by swat team..
    Given the current state of affairs, what is new?
    You currently cannot travel without documents.
    Your savings are being confiscated by government devaluation.
    Your property is only yours until some bureaucrat wants to take it.
    You can be charged at any time with a whole slew of indefensible “crimes’.
    Just try defending yourself against charges of contaminating a waterway, causing a hazardous spill.Or speeding ticket from photo radar.
    We already have no law.

  6. Says Fernandez: “Immediately after legal scholar Philip Bobbitt tried to explain the history and future of the State in his book The Shield of Achilles, a brief intellectual storm swept the non-American Anglosphere as intellectuals pored over it… Public officials who follow Bobbitt’s works include the former Prime Minister Tony Blair; the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams; and the former Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard.”
    If you are an adult whose values are so loosely held that they can be changed by simply reading a book then you are morally adrift and decribes the liberal mind as evidenced by Fernandez’ examples of easily swayed “public officials.”
    The absence of core values in the liberal mind explains their gullibility. They are intellectual rubes who are easily tricked into many an ill-advised scheme.

  7. Kate:
    congress agreed to fastrack the treaty – thats on them – not Obama.

  8. ““It would be profoundly in the interest of citizens throughout the region if . . . you could see an equilibrium developing between Sunni, or predominantly Sunni, Gulf states and Iran . . . If you can start unwinding some of [the distrust among the states of the region], that creates a new equilibrium.”
    ~Obama
    The states in the region exist as they are because of religion and very large extended family structure that properly compose of literal tribes.
    The people see things in terms of religion, family, tribe.
    It is what their culture is made of.
    The states of the region have largely only existed since WWI.
    Jettisoning the state itself matters not to them.
    What Obama sees as superseding the state, the people see as an attack on their religion and tribe.
    Their very culture, not the state, is what is attacked.
    That is why the door is wide open to the existence of a Caliphate, an Islamic State.
    Here too, and western Europe, the people whose tribes and culture are under attack by the state see it much the same way. Remember Obama’s remark about bitter clingers who cling to their guns and their Bibles?
    It’s just that so many have forsaken their paternal culture and the religion that underpins it that they have no rallying point to push back.
    The American Revolutionaries met and planned their revolution in the churches.
    Elites arrogantly assuming they know what is profoundly in our interest have starkly, concretely, shown us that they do not share our interest or point of view at all to the point that it is obvious that the also do not understand why or what we are interested in as well.
    It is no wonder that in the Islamic world that when permitted elections, with the exception of some large and some small minorities of the people within what we see as states, elect Islamic fundamentalists because these Islamists have shown that they share more of the culture of the voters than the political elites the people perceive as secular, even atheistic sellouts to a one world government which would strip all of the legacy inhabitants of their religion and culture to achieve world government.

  9. .
    What our leaders in government have mistaken is … they are servants of the people whereas they seem to believe and behave as RULERS of the people.
    It’s that old Magna Carta thing …
    The revolution has begun, it is not yet violent, it is being televised.
    .

  10. Some great comments here, particularly the ones that see our political elites failing to recognize human nature and the need for folks to identify with a greater moral perogative. The formation of “States” was an effective way for like-minded people to organize themselves. The “modern state”, however, is based on self interest and it should not surprise that it is seen as working in opposition to the “better angels” that regular folks sense are there.

  11. Here is something that will seem unrelated at first, but there is a connection to how liberals are blind and foolish,
    yesterday in an interview on tv Roger Waters of Pink Floyd ranted about how it was scandalous that anyone can copy anyone’s music, that the people who wrote that music are being robbed by millions of people who take this music as if they were entitled to it.
    he also blamed ” Silicon Valley” who are – he says – responsible for this. he called the people of Silicon valley *ss h*les.
    yes he called them *ss h*les for making it easy to steal music.
    He was that angry.
    then a couple minutes later he started a rant against Donald Trump, he was almost foaming at the mouth so much he hates Trump and his wanting to stop illegals with a wall.
    and then it hit me.
    it . hit. me.
    Millions of people taking someone else music because the people in charge make them feel entitled to it,
    is the EXACT same thing as
    Millions of people taking someone else land because the people in charge make them feel they are entitled to it.
    They are EXACTLY the same thing.
    Music writers/owners are right to be very angry and to want to put a system in place ( an internet wall? a firewall? ) to keep people from taking their property.
    and Americans are right to be very angry and to want to put a system in place ( even a wall ) to keep people from taking their property.
    Music writers/owners are right that they should take back control of their property.
    Americans are right that they should be able to take back control of their land and borders.
    those two things are EXACTLY the same thing.
    Yet liberals such as Roger Waters are totally TOTALLY blind to it.
    He is fine with millions of people stealing the land ( and the hard earned dollars, those illegals cost billions of $$$ ) of Americans…
    …but he is up in arms that millions of people are stealing music.
    in his little liberal brain, Robbing Americans of their land is fine but robbing music is the most heinous crime.
    He can not see they are the exact same thing.
    Both are illegal and immoral, both are a grave injustice towards the owners of the property.
    Both should and must be stopped.
    but he can not see they are the same thing.
    Liberals no matter how intelligent or educated or successful or if they are zillionaires like Roger Waters have some strange mental defect that distorts reality.
    In the last few decades we have moved further and further to the left, the establishment now is the left, they control everything,
    is it any wonder the world is in on the brink of crumbling to pieces?

  12. You are obviously a liberal, who thinks government has it’s own money. Transfer payments from have provinces to be distributed to have not provinces. Since Alberta will soon be a have not province there will be a lot less funds to go around If you cannot understand have your mom read it to you.

  13. Seeing as Republicans fought hard to give the president the power to circumvent Congress, and seeing as Congress is now nothing but a bunch of irrational obstructionist morons who would rather fight wars than make peace… screw ’em.
    Conservatism is going down the toilet. It just got too crazy. Sites like this helped.
    It’s actually too bad. I’m a progressive, but I strongly believe that constructive conservatism is 100% necessary to form a balanced government. But what we have now is just plain ol’ crazy rightwing madness. So I can’t say I’m sorry to see it sink.

  14. “You are obviously a liberal, who thinks government has it’s own money. Transfer payments from have provinces to be distributed to have not provinces.”
    And you obviously didn’t read what I wrote. One more time:
    The provinces, i.e. provincial governments, play no role at all in providing “transfer payments”, only in receiving them (or not). The monies that fund transfer payments are collected from all Canadians through Federal taxation, irrespective of where they reside.
    It wouldn’t much matter if I were Liberal, Conservative, Green Party, Wild Rose or Parti Québécois; this is how the equalization programme works. If there isn’t enough money to go around, the Federal Government could:
    1. increase Federal taxes;
    2. increase the Federal debt (through borrowing); and/or
    3. pay out less in transfers to the provinces.

  15. uuuuuhhhhhh . . . . . . pffft.
    sounds like a scenario that puts if not official *ownership* of finite resources in a very few hands, then *control* over those resources is ceded by the masses into a very few hands that claim they have the interests of said populous at heart.
    to do what they want.
    the political spectrum is like the bending of space, keep going in any direction and you wind up pack where you started. at least that’s the way it was explained to me.

  16. “is it any wonder the world is in on the brink of crumbling to pieces?”
    in some quarters this is the kind of stuff interpreted as additional signs of the end times.
    the props boys, measuring the stage to build the props for the great world wide tragedy-farce of one performance when everyone is both audience and actor.

  17. It is soon time for the Globalist to pull the plug on the economy of the world…Sheeples will soon beg to be saved…A new world currency will follow.
    Nations will be no more. Freedom will be an illusion. Sheeples will demand security from the unrest. Heavily armed patrols will be everywhere all the time. Curfews. No go zones.
    A high tech, soft tyranny, police world is the vision of the Globalists who will decide everything from who is entitled to be born to whom is still worthy to continue living in their old age.
    The globalists are the new Pharaohs. Their intent is not malicious. They just want to be Gods.

Navigation