10 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”

  1. Why were they using email for correspondence? Somewhat surprised these folks are not on Hillary’s favorites list on her phone…
    asking her, what she’s wearing (which color of pantsuit) for the next interview, so they don’t clash on Tv, important stuff like that.
    “Hey Hills..” … “Hey Marc…” … “how’re things? … whatcha thinking bout snuggle puss… oh, you know, private helicopter rides and stuff, what’re you thinking ’bout tiger?”
    /possible sarc.

  2. It’s a good thing they redacted most of the message. Now we have to make up our own stories to guess what they’re trying to hide.
    The “Bill needs a humidor…” in the original might be taken the wrong way. Or more likely it was about the best yoga stretches to do while under snipper fire?

  3. American taxpayers pay billions of dollars so these dumb-asses can communicate..

    Hey Hill, U know Paula gave Bill a knob job ?

  4. If there’s a special prison for arrogant, stupid, reckless people, Hillary and a good number of her staff ought to be in it.

  5. 2016 will be the year when Physics Departments of most major universities throughout the English/German/French speaking world will be notified by our group regarding the false physics in the Greenhouse Radiative Forcing conjecture.
    Whilst the mean ocean surface temperature is indeed due to solar heating, it is important to understand that the “solar heating” is not achieved by way of direct solar radiation reaching the ocean surface and (mostly) passing through the first meter or so. Stefan-Boltzmann calculations readily confirm this.
    Instead, the ocean surface receives the required thermal energy by means of the non-radiative “heat creep” process that I have been first in the world to explain based on the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
    The science of heat transfer lies totally within the realm of physics, and so only those with a sound knowledge and understanding of entropy and thermodynamics will understand what I have explained at http://climate-change-theory.com
    In summary, the old 20th century Greenhouse Radiative Forcing conjecture cannot explain the required thermal energy transfers and the reason why a planet’s surface temperature rises each planetary morning. The process of entropy maximization is totally ignored and there is a false assumption that separate sources of radiation (the atmosphere and the Sun) have a compounding effect so that (they think) the sum of the fluxes can be used in Stefan-Boltzmann calculations. That is wrong, but it is indeed what those energy budget diagrams imply. If it were correct and one electric bar radiator could raise an object to 350K, then 16 such radiators would raise it to 700K. That doesn’t happen, so the greenhouse conjecture is totally and utterly debunked.
    The correct 21st century “heat creep” hypothesis is, instead, based on the laws of physics and it explains the morning warming for planets like Earth and Venus, as well as the observed temperatures. You cannot prove it wrong. Nobody has in nearly two years, despite the AU $10,000 reward on offer for doing so.

  6. Notice how this woman went silent on Twitter in mid-November. Someone at the State Department tipped her off that this would be released and so now she can pretend the subsequent uproar on Twitter doesn’t exist.

Navigation