Climate models versus climate reality
Everyone by now is familiar with the “pause” or “slowdown” in the rate of global warming that has taken place over the past 20 years of so, but few realize is that the observed warming rate has been beneath the model mean expectation for periods extending back to the mid-20th century–60+ years.
We demonstrate this fact with our comparison of the observed warming rate to that of the range of climate model-predicted warming rates for all periods from 1951 ending with the most recent available data.
ALL the climate models predict more warming, than actually occurs.
But the fraudsters are still hopeful no one notices….
The thing that the LIV’s, (not necessarily their fault) don’t know about the whole scheme is that it is a scheme made up by those that wanted to get certain results.
The scheme has nothing to do with reality of climate, science or anything else the schemers put into it.
They, the schemers or scammers, your pick, have decided to make themselves rich by slight of “scientific” hand. They done themselves well. Not so much the rest of us.
When the cold era suddenly comes, they will still insist that it is really global warming caused by the plebeians. Remember that the flying, dining and other associated largesse does not come to question, it is only you that are at fault, not them. They have to fly where the resorts are, you don’t qualify.
On the other hand you can raise your voice and say to them that you will do as you please and they are swindlers.
You can also let them know that the subject is not up for debate.
End of story.
Oh you denier fiends. Everyone knows we have “calibrated” and “adjusted” readings from surface weather stations and the temperatures we make up for the oceans (which obviously we didn’t even have before, so we must “estimate”); all of them show the world was “colder” than actual observations. That’s why it’s “warmer” now. How do we know Antarctic is “warmer” now? Two reasons, we cooled the past and the one measurement station on the entire continent says so.
You say satellite measurements repudiate the theory and show no warming. Clearly somebody’s cherry picking. No wait, that’s us. Anyway, we need thirty years to show cooling, like the warming between 1960 and 1990. Same warming period for same length at same rate in same century. Let me explain why they’re different – shut up oil shill holocaust denier.
Take past readings, cool them off. Then take the average of all surface and made up ocean temperature measurements, for the whole planet, for one day, then average them out for one year, then plot that on a graph. Voila CAGW. Using models and experiments that are repudiated by actual observations are obvious proof of CAGW. Anyone who doesn’t see that is “anti-science.”
Quite sad really.
Another problem with models:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-18/humans-are-slamming-into-driverless-cars-and-exposing-a-key-flaw
Were getting snow down here in Siskiyou county in the mountians and still these gaia worshipping idiots blame Global Warming like crack=poys like James Hanson dose and a cracked urn like James Lovelock who preaches this Gaia poppycock and of course Al Gore who blames everything on Global Warming and David Suzuki who is a few corn dogs short of a picnic
What’s surprising about snow in Siskiyou county, it’s on the same latitude as Chicago.
Anthony Watts is presenting his study at the fall meetings of the AGU. Looks like NOAA has some more adjusting to do.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/17/press-release-agu15-the-quality-of-temperature-station-siting-matters-for-temperature-trends/
NEW STUDY OF NOAA’S U.S. CLIMATE NETWORK SHOWS A LOWER 30-YEAR TEMPERATURE TREND WHEN HIGH QUALITY TEMPERATURE STATIONS UNPERTURBED BY URBANIZATION ARE CONSIDERED
Facts, scientific method and such are relevant to the question at hand.
However, P.M. Just in Trudeau will order a federal ‘carbon tax’ by standing in Parliament to exclaim “Because, it’s 2015 or 2016 or 2017 or 2018”
Really, what he’ll be saying is “L’état, c’est moi!”