25 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. Yes by whatever means we can get more stuff for free. Wealth distribution by the authority of nothing. Oh and by the way, they’re murdering immigrants. Whew! Great point! Too bad in an Anarchy we wouldn’t be able to elect you.

  2. So the woman doesn’t think much of the policy of “drowning immigrants”. Just how much of her own funds, whether paid directly or funded through taxes of a government she doesn’t think should exist, does she think should go to support said immigrants? My guess – none.

  3. We have been warned about these evil commies and their sinister plans for america get ready for the gulags and the closing of churches and the murders of priests by the Commie pigs

  4. I checked out the Liberal party website today.
    Their ‘pro-active disclosure’ is moving along as well as expected.
    http://www.liberal.ca/
    Hit the link, hit ‘members of parliament’, find one you like, then at the bottom of their bio, hit the ‘proactive disclosure’ link.
    But don’t hit David McGuinty’s link, you will get nothing.
    Don’t hit Dion’s link because you will get nothing.
    Don’t hit McCallum’s link because you will get nothing.
    Don’t hit Vaughn’s link because you will get nothing.
    There are a few more that will give you the same result.
    In fact, if you hit any link you will get nothing posted in the last year. If you are adventurous, you can look up ‘hospitality’ expenses posted pre-June 2014.
    But don’t expect too much. Most are simply listed as ‘dinner,stakeholders $250.00’. They may say which restaurant the ‘stakeholders’ were wined and dined, but you won’t know who they were or why we picked up the tab.
    The Liberal ‘pro-active disclosure’ is a farce. The numbers submitted cannot be aligned with the amounts claimed because of the differing accounting periods.
    Surprisingly,the media has not noticed. I’m shocked.

  5. My mistake, I missed a step above.
    After you get to the Liberal party site, you have to hit ‘Team Trudeau’, and then the other 3 links to get close to their ‘open and transparent’ disclosures.

  6. Contradiction much? like seriously first they say they’re stateless. Which usually means “lack of government or rulers” then they turn around say that they’re pro state in terms of immigration and wealth redistribution. This is not anarchism it’s leftists on meth that like to make false statements and hear themselves talk.
    These people are smart as stick

  7. Citoyen NDPBloc Mulcair’s Joual Merde Gurgle.
    “mangez” something The Gargoyle will not repeat.”
    …-
    “Bizarre incident in NDP lobby mars end of session”
    “In a string of joual expletives, Moore reportedly told her colleagues she had been dealing with an issue for three months and was fed up and finished, instructing them to “mangez” something The Gargoyle will not repeat.”
    http://www.canada.com/life/Gargoyle%20Bizarre%20incident%20lobby%20mars%20session/11151990/story.html

  8. Actually, it follows either of these two paths:
    Anarchy -> thuggery -> despotism or
    Anarchy -> thuggery -> tribalism

  9. The term “Communist Anarchist(s)” is used fairly often in many of my Russian revolution and civil war history books. Particularly in association with Nestor Makhno.

  10. I am going to tell you a story. Once upon a time there was a country called England that ruled much of the world. The citizens were not retards – they were ambitious and driven to success. What happened?
    What do you mean “What about Canada?”

  11. Communists/Marxists never quite explain just how the dictatorship of the proletariat, socialism, with the “state” owning all property, people and ideas, morphs into the anarchic utopia of the communist collective where the government “withers away” and we all end up happily prancing about in comradeship with each other. Instead, socialism gets “stuck” on totalitarian despotism, misery, conflict and collapse. Why? Because despots are never interested in seeing their power “wither away.”
    Marx didn’t understood the formation of a democratic society and a prosperous middle “class,” so his theories about how to achieve economic freedom are essentially disproved by their existence, and the grossly coercive socialist state which jealously guards its influence and power.
    IOW the communist anarchists idea sound like BS because they are demonstrably invalid.

  12. UN Report on latest “Gaza War” – remember, if you choose to defend yourself, your enemies could interpret that as a “war crime.”
    Israel fires back at UN report accusing it and Hamas of violating world law in Gaza war:
    “The Palestinians have moved the battlefield to the United Nations,” said Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor. “The UN is the true frontlines, the Human Rights Council serves as the soldiers of the Palestinians and Hamas, and this biased report is their weapon. The UN has been taken hostage by terrorist organizations, and in this battle the international community will lose. If we continue to give legitimacy to this attack, we will all pay the price.
    “Any comparison between IDF soldiers who seek to defend innocent civilians, and the terrorists who indiscriminately target Israelis while deliberately endangering Palestinians is completely unacceptable,” he said.”
    It’s amazing how succinct one can be when facing an existential threat; and this:
    “There was no immediate comment from Hamas, which the report said also may have committed war crimes in firing rockets at Israeli civilian population centers.”
    I’m sure they’ll be doing a press release real soon, as they search their “Kill the Jews” database for an appropriate response.
    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/06/22/israel-fires-back-at-un-report-accusing-it-and-hamas-violating-world-law-in/?intcmp=latestnews

  13. Liberalism Today.
    Same as yesterday: It’s your fault.
    …-
    “Confederate flag, a ‘symbol of racist oppression,’ belongs only in museum” (ourcbc)
    …-
    “Premier Rachel Notley has apologized to indigenous Albertans for the …” (ourcbc)
    …-
    “Earth is on the brink of a sixth mass extinction, scientists say … and it’s humans’ fault”
    “‘We are now moving into another one of these events that could easily, easily ruin the lives of everybody on the planet,’ Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich said”
    http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/earth-is-on-the-brink-of-a-sixth-mass-extinction-scientists-say-and-its-humans-fault

  14. Well, Marx considered that the achievement of socialism would result in the withering away of the state, so there’s a real sense in which communism is actually a form of anarchism. But then Stalin taught that the withering away of the state could only be achieved by the maximisation of state power, and communism established itself in a different sense entirely, ie. as a form of pseudo-anarchism with which to dupe the gullible.

  15. Yes, in theory, as taught in political science, communism is an “anarchic” ideology because socialism is supposed to be a temporary “state” leading to the withering away of the state that is supposed to take place (but never does owing to the more powerful Iron Law of Oligarchy). In practice, it never does, so communism never manifests itself. Put another way “communist state” is a political oxymoron.

Navigation