Mr. Mulcair’s twisted logic drew a quick response from a very interesting source: the federal NDP. Charlie Angus, NDP MP for Timmins-James Bay, put a press release up on his website with the rather blunt headline, “NDP NOT BRINGING BACK THE GUN REGISTRY — PERIOD.” (Yes, it was all in capital letters.) Mr. Angus then told reporters that Mr. Mulcair’s comments made him “[bang] my head on the table.” The NDP, Mr. Angus said, would work on cracking down on black market guns and on making sure firearms are classified appropriately. But no, repeat no, registry.
Sometimes you just want to put your feet up, crack open a beer, and watch the twits devour each other.
It’s Mulcair that calls the shots and he has already shown himself to be single minded and illogical regarding what’s best for the country. Mr Angus can beat his head on the table all he likes, but it wont deter a dictator who sees all guns as evil, where in reality the only evil would come to light if only the police and the human garbage had access to weapons and the average citizen was left with the inability to defend himself. Even registration is just a foot in the door and promises more controls in the future. Insulated city thinking can not be allowed to rule rural and small town Canada. Mulcair has fired a warning shot across the rural bow and the NDP will pay a price for that. Not that they have a hope in hell of winning anyway, but they could become king makers, in which case……god help us all.
Yup. Too bad wangus hadn’t finished his sentence.
…at least, not until we form a government, in which case I’ll fall in line like any other good little MP.
I can just imagine a classification system for guns under an NDP government: Guns for cops – OK Guns for soldiers – OK. Guns for bad guys – not really OK. Guns for regular people – definitely not OK.
Don’t be too happy just yet. The NDP were too clever by half when they set up the faux rape gambit on the hill. The “don’t touch me, but here is my favourite brand of condom” defense will not work well in the court or pub(l)ic opinion, especially with women. If the NDP shoot themselves in the foot with gun control they may drop below 25% in the prairies which may open up a few ridings for the Liberals. And if they cannot take sufficient votes away from the Liberals in Toronto and Quebec because the rape ploy comes apart, they may not create the vote split the Conservatives need to keep their majority status. As Kissinger allegedly said when the Iranian and Iraqis were killing each other; I wish them both the very best of luck.
The “gun control issue” (AKA civilian disarmament-disempowerment)brings the globalist cockroaches out of the woodwork every time. Civilian disarmament must occur before UN agenda 21 (end of private property and ascension of the global authoritarian state) can be fully realized. Every avaricious politician who wants a warm fat UN sinecure is pimping the global-socialist agenda for a state monopoly on the use of deadly force (AKA gun control)Just like Adolph, Uncle Joe and Mao had.
These UN sycophants will deliver up our nation and our freedoms to the global governance cartel for a promise of cheap UN seat and all the hookers and booze that goes with it. There is nothing is easier to buy than a greedy little pseudo-commie bureaucrat. You want to see a dissolute, treasonous belly crawling porcine creature – look for polis who keep pimping the tired old gun control narrative in an era where the majority of people see the con.
.
Its always the same when some communities strict gun control law is struck down as UNCONSTITUTIONAL the same idiotic reaction from the media idiots OLD WEST SHOOT-OUTS,RIVERS OF BLOOD IN THE STREETS, Etc but nothing happens makes you want to shove some liberal journalists news paper up their nose Typicaly since most liberal journalists are leftists as well
I suspect that Charlie Angus is just trying to hang on to his seat and will do so as an independent if he has to. He knows that NDP gun control advocacy would be the death knell for his campaign in 2015. He would rather cross Mulcair than his voters.
If the guns laws in the States are so lax that Canadian politicians are afraid that “we’ll end up like the Old West” will somebody please explain why there are not more deaths occurring during these riots? Why aren’t all these rootin, tootin, cowboys protecting their property by shooting the looters? And while I’m on this rant will somebody tell me why politicians that want gun control (confiscation) always bring up the old canard “we register our cars and trucks”. Tell me what the he(ll) registering our vehicles does other than increasing the tax base. Registration doesn’t prevent car theft, it doesn’t prevent repeated DUI charges, it doesn’t prevent dangerous driving, it doesn’t prevent accidents, it doesn’t prevent incompetent drivers from purchasing vehicles that are powered far beyond their ability and mentality to operate. In other words it doesn’t matter how you slice it gun registration is only the first step in dis-arming the taxpayer, and as many of you here have noted, it took Hitler less than five years from implementing his guns laws to hauling his opponents and then the Jews into the camps. When only the police, military and crooks have guns it is then to late.
Let’s hope Charlie Angus DOES hold on to his seat! Angus’s work on the terrible “Stephen Harper’s fault”, situation in Attawapiskat has been nothing short of Nobel prize winning!
Until I read this, I had always dreamed of the day we could hang progressives like Charlie Angus, after this I wouldn’t smack the horse quite so hard.
Agreed. I wish more Canadian would become aware of UN Agenda 21 and oppose it at every opportunity. When I try to explain it to people, they just don’t get it or they agree with it. Why do Canadian sheeple just sit back and take the sheering? WTF
Everybody loves it when Colonel Angus comes to visit.
Gun control died with Al Gore in the 2000 USA election. Even the lunatics of the Canadian NDPee have finally, fourteen years later, gotten the message.
L?renzo >
“I wish more Canadian would become aware of UN Agenda 21”
Cheryl Gallant Conservative MP – Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke has heard of it and has asked people to sign a petition………….
94% polled thinks it should be an election issue, but I’ve never seen it publicized on any media MSM or otherwise.
Go ahead and cast your vote:
http://cherylgallant.com/2014/08/28/report-parliament-9/#gform_wrapper_42
Charlie Angus, meet Mary Landrieu. Mary Landrieu, meet Charlie Angus. Here is the boat you will be sharing together. The oars and sail will be in the mail.
Thanks I just voted.
Yes, thank you knight99, I just voted too.
Thread topic: Armed self defence is a natural God-given right.
The gun grabbers are never going to understand this.
Gun Grabber: “Why do you think you need to carry a gun?”
Me: “Because carrying a cop is too inconvenient and the person that is trying to kill me might be a cop.” “Why are you afraid of an armed citizenry?” “What is your secret agenda?”
In a new riding that was created in Sherwood Park there were two nomination candidates. I asked both if they were aware of Agenda21 and neither one had any idea. That said I will be reminding Genius at every opportunity.
Here are two simple examples of the Agenda21. Alberta 3 Land titles acts.
Federal waterways act.
Cheryl Gallant is concerned about funding being cut where rural infrastructure is needed. The purpose is to force people out of the country and into the cities.
Everyone who knows, needs to inform all who will listen.
I voted, and made a comment about Agenda 21 having the same ideas about taking control of all the land as the old Soviet Union did.
As did I. Mentioning in passing that the UN was just a haven for crackpots, tyrants, despots and other assorted snake oil salesmen. Still at 94% for getting the hell out of there.
This could be subtitled, ‘Who You Gonna Believe.’
The Left are ideological opposed to the private ownership of guns and that includes the NDP’s new ideological partner the Libs. Yes if either party or a coalition of the two gain power we’ll see another Gun Registry although probably under another name to protect the fact that they may have said they wouldn’t bring one in.
Angus is just trying to protect his own skin and he’s probably already been warned about disagreeing with the leader.
Gun Grabber: “Why do you think you need to carry a gun?”
The Phantom: “Why do you think you don’t?”
Or my old stand by: “Who the hell are you to decide what -I’m- going to carry?”
When your opponents are bashing the hell our of each other – for God sake – remain a spectator!