Christopher Monckton of Brenchley;
“I am an expert reviewer for the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I wrote to you two weeks ago to report a serious error in the Fourth Assessment Report. I have had no reply. My letter of two weeks ago is attached, together with a copy of a letter I have sent to the Inter-Academy Council asking it to use its good offices to persuade you to reply. I have also sent a letter, for information only at this stage, to the police in Geneva, since it appears that a fraud may have been committed by the IPCC.”
h/t Maz2
He reported the IPCC to the cops?! How great is that?
God bless Lord Monckton. There will always be an England.
have to wonder if the demoCRAP/Obumbles, “I know nothing” works for these fools
me thinks it is beer and popcorn time:-))))
This guy is a real Man, not the mewing power freaks of the UN.
Like Pamela Geller. I wish we had even a 1000 of them.
A doer not a parasite.
Not that he probably doesn’t have his own human problems. At least he’s trying to bring some truth to this nest of Global warming lies.
He has been stalwart in his many conviction through ridicule or being vilified.
Climate Depot, where this latest Monckton tactic is lifted from, is also going hard against the ‘97% of scientists agree’ issue.
Love Lord Moncton not only for his backbone, intelligence and resolve, but also for his masterful use of the English language.
“No doubt there will now be an internal enquiry to discover why he did not pass it on.”
A bit facetious too.
You really have to hand it to Moncton. The guy is relentless, and he writes beautifully.
The UN’s reply states “We would like to inform you that the error claim that you have submitted is now being taken care of as per the IPCC Protocol for Addressing Errors in IPCC Assessment Reports, Synthesis Reports, Special Reports or Methodology Reports, available on the IPCC website”
You have to shake your head at the complete stupidity of the UN and its massive bureaucracy. Why we still give money to the organization is beyond me. Come on Harper, free us from the UN.
I was just reading a GWPF link where it is reported that the IPCC’s new report is claiming a climate “time bomb” will explode by 2040. Apparently the temp plateau we are experiencing is just the calm before the storm. The only solution is rapid decarbonization via carbon pricing. They admit that natural cycles are the reason Doom is delayed but, like Harold Camping, Doom is imminent.
Will Monkton’s approach force the IPCC to more accurately reflect the real observations and future uncertainty? Worth a try. I expect they’ll paper over the prediction failures with the more misleading graphs and the Orwellian sounding “retroactive predictions” that are currently in vogue in the climate science world.
Settled Science?
Without gravity acting to restore the thermodynamic equilibrium which is stipulated in the Second Law of Thermodynamics (which says: “An isolated system, if not already in its state of thermodynamic equilibrium, spontaneously evolves towards it. Thermodynamic equilibrium has the greatest entropy amongst the states accessible to the system”) and thus, as a direct corollary of that Law, supporting (at the molecular level) an autonomous thermal gradient, then …
(1) The temperature at the base of the troposphere on Uranus would be nowhere near as hot as 320K because virtually no direct Solar radiation gets down there, and there is no surface at that altitude. The planet’s radiating temperature is under 60K because it receives less than 3W/m^2.
(2) The temperature of the Venus surface would be nowhere near as hot as 730K (even at the poles) because it receives only about 10% as much direct Solar radiation at its surface as does Earth at its surface.
(3) Jupiter would be nowhere near as hot, even in its core, which receives extra kinetic energy which was converted by gravity from gravitational potentential energy due to the continual collapsing of this gaseous planet. This is why Jupiter emits more radiation than it receives.
(4) The core of our Moon would be nowhere near as hot as it is thought to be, probably over 1000K.
(5) Earth’s surface would indeed be perhaps 20 to 40 degrees colder, and the core, mantle and crust nowhere near as hot, maybe no molten material at all.
Think about it! If you’re not sure why, it’s explained in Sections 4 to 9 and Section 15 here.
Credit for the this link goes to Occam:
FROM THE AGW FRAUD FILES:
– – Monckton charges IPCC with fraud and gets a response
Posted by: Occam on May 21, 2013 8:57 AM
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/reader-tips-2423.html#comments
Thank-you once again, Lord Moncton. You make those freaks at the climate fraud haus look like fools. They can’t deal with a heavy weight IQ and it frightens them to be ‘attacked’ by such a man. Thank-you Kate for keeping us up to date on Lord Moncton and for never giving the crooks who want to impoverish free people via forcing us to pay for ‘hot air’, any wiggle room or any benefit of doubt . The zealots never expected to encounter the like of our hostess here at SDA or Tim Ball or ‘Whats up with That’ or Lord Moncton’s official ally re: AGW; PMSH.