Voter fraud sure is prevalent.
You Americans and your pretend Democracy, so cute.
19 Replies to “For something fictitious”
I mean, she had the best of intentions. It’s not like she was a right winger.
“‘I’ll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama’s right to sit as president of the United States,’ she proclaimed in the interview.”
People who favor voter ID laws are just racist or something…
As a pal of mine has said from the beginning of the Obama Wrecking Team’s emergence, he has always figured that the vote was rigged. Sounds like he might just be right.
read about this a few days ago, and the most troubling thing I find is that she proclaimed that what she did WAS legal. Being as she’s black, well a slap on the wrist may be all that comes of this, when the 12 jail term (the max allowable) would be appropriate, as she was a poll worker. Now one wonders how many nation wide “legally” vote more than once???
Yes I robbed that bank. There was no intention on my part to commit theft.
I LOVE the Canadian way – I’ve worked as a party scrutineer at a poll a number of times in the past. Watch the process all day, ensure no hijinks (usually is seniors with their “attendant” that present the most problems). At the end of the day, DRO dumps the ballot box on the table, shows every scrutineer each ballot, puts it on a pile for each candidate. Count piles, agree on result, phone results to campaign office to track what Elections Canada is reporting. Pencil, paper, eyeballs – pretty much infallible. Being a software engineer by day, Whenever I hear electronic voting is coming I shudder.
Because the left “thinks” that Obama has a right to be president they have lied, cheated, and committed fraud to get him there. And they see nothing wrong with it! Warped sense of right and wrong. This is why they favour tyrants over lawfully elected leaders. This is why they would be better off living in third world countries. And if they can’t move to one they will turn their own into a dump to suit themselves. Sad and pathetic people. Now I worry about the leftist retards in Canada and how far they will go to illegally insert an unqualified idiot like Turdo into power.
Democrats have a huge problem with people having to show proper identification to vote. There are many lefties who are okay with women voting while their faces are covered, ostensibly for religious reasons. Proven fraud notwithstanding,there are many lefties who believe citizens and even dual citizens should be able to vote over the interweb using a computer from wherever on earth such a person might be on election day. At the same time the lefties think that all guns should be registered and mandatory invasive background checks should be done on citizens who have had spotless criminal records for their entire lives. Even though statistics show clearly that ethics murdering ethics in Democrat run cities such as Chicago, Detroit and DC are where many or most gun deaths occur, the Democratic party wants no part in disarming much less incarcerating the perpetrators (aka: their voter base). But they demagogue endlessly to keep tax payers from buying a gun suitable to protect themselves and their families. Gun sales skyrocketing in the US you say? Now why would that be?
I refuse to ever vote again until all voters are required to provide ID. Until then the act of voting is a farce.
Now ew know why the Democrats do not want voter id.
I suspect that this woman is just the tip of the iceberg.
Seriously? Her name is “Melowese”? Reminds me of this: The Jacksun Rises
RN, I’m a software designer as well. Totally agree with you that such machines offer an easy and virtually untraceable way to fix an election. Our current system works well – we always have a result by midnight. No need to change it, IMHO.
Vote early, vote often.
Systemic fraud seems to be the progressives style.
What would you expect from people, whose stated policy is to not admit what they plan for you?
It is highly probable that the US voter is nowhere near as stupid as the media pretends, that with systemic fraud and with media complicity the election was stolen.
Computerized voting systems are wonderful tools.
For committing fraud and limiting accountability.
Fraud would also explain Obama’s attitude toward the media.
Beneath contempt even from a beneficiary?
Yes the left inflated their side of the equation which pales in comparison to their deflation of the right’s vote count. Given the number of “broken glass” republicans (those republican voters who would have crawled over broken glass to get rid of Obumbler there is no way other than electronic vote suppression that the Republican vote was less than it was for the old fogy and the hot VP candidate.
*snicker* Six times my auntie, that’s just the times Jezebel will cop to. Six “forties” doesn’t an Obama victory party make.
RN: Our “voter ID” system is so much security theatre. Someone showing up to vote will assuredly not be asked for proof he is a subject of the Queen of Canada, like a birth certificate or passport.
Any jackass whose cousin Mohammed invited him to stay as a permanent “tourist” can vote Liberal or NDP in a federal election, if Mohammed asks him to do so. All he has to do is one of the following:
1. Provide a government issued ID with photo, name and address (read: “Buy as many fake drivers’ licenses with fake names and addresses as Mohammed can afford”);
2. Provide two pieces of ID without photo, one with your address, both with his name on it (Read: “Dig a hydro bill out of a neighbouring trash can, and buy a fake medicare card with the same name on it”);
3. “Take an oath and have an elector who knows [him] vouch for [him]. This person must have authorized identification and be from the same polling division as [him]. This person can only vouch for one person.” (Read: “If you can’t speak English well enough to lie convincingly, bring Mohammed and have him do the lying for you; his imam will help the two of you get your story straight.”)
If we were at all serious, we’d have a system like Mexico’s. Nobody can vote without an ID card issued by the federal elections board, and the board will not give you one unless you can prove you’re a Mexican citizen. If Alberta had done something similar, Danielle Smith might well be premier of Alberta today.
Voter fraud committed by someone in the demographic group that commits 80% of all crimes in the USA despite being only 12% of the population?
why would anyone be surprised?
Yes I mean blacks.
Wonder what happened with the voter machines that were siezed by the FBI shortly after the election.
Maybe they recalibrated them before testing then found nothing wrong.
Maybe they stole the election maybe they didn’t (I believe they did) but they sure as hell stole the future generations ability to think for themselves.
It seems that the major moves in the People Control (AKA Gun Control) is focused on those that do not live in the same areas that the overwhelming amount of murders occurs. Lot’s of it is focused on the folks that live anywhere near these jungles. Just what a fella needs. Being disarmed when deadly & stupid danger is just miles away. Lovely, just frigging lovely.
I stand corrected and in agreement with some of the posts after mine – identifying the voter as valid prior to the casting of their ballot is a terrible process in our system, and is more on point with the article. I do believe however that the way we scrutinize ballots, count them, and report results works very well. Kinda liking a hybrid of Canada + Mexico from what I read above…
This article doesn’t even scratch the surface, I’m sure.
There must be a public debate of those who want voter identification and those who don’t. Use this criminal and others like her as sound reasons why a simple driver’s license is democracy’s friend.
Granted, the Canadian system is pretty straightforward, but as you describe it, it gets ugly if there’s >1 office on the ballot. Even the city election we just completed here had three issues, two city-wide (mayor and a referendum) and one by riding (city council). In November, we had six, and the outlying towns had seven or eight (some of which were “vote for more than one”, and those are a lot trickier).
And I can think of some “hijinks” you can pull with old-fashioned ballots (conveniently “losing” some of them, or sneaking in some counterfeits). That said, the best system I can think of is optical-scan ballots, sorted by a simple machine with by-hand checks to make sure they are all in the right pile, and both machine and hand counts of the number per pile.
(Disclosure: my county uses optical-scan ballots, although I don’t know how they are counted. Paperless ballots are used only as an assistive technology for those whose disabilities don’t allow them to fill out the standard ballot, and I can’t object to that–although it would be best for the machine to print a scannable ballot at the end.)
I mean, she had the best of intentions. It’s not like she was a right winger.
“‘I’ll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama’s right to sit as president of the United States,’ she proclaimed in the interview.”
People who favor voter ID laws are just racist or something…
As a pal of mine has said from the beginning of the Obama Wrecking Team’s emergence, he has always figured that the vote was rigged. Sounds like he might just be right.
read about this a few days ago, and the most troubling thing I find is that she proclaimed that what she did WAS legal. Being as she’s black, well a slap on the wrist may be all that comes of this, when the 12 jail term (the max allowable) would be appropriate, as she was a poll worker. Now one wonders how many nation wide “legally” vote more than once???
Yes I robbed that bank. There was no intention on my part to commit theft.
I LOVE the Canadian way – I’ve worked as a party scrutineer at a poll a number of times in the past. Watch the process all day, ensure no hijinks (usually is seniors with their “attendant” that present the most problems). At the end of the day, DRO dumps the ballot box on the table, shows every scrutineer each ballot, puts it on a pile for each candidate. Count piles, agree on result, phone results to campaign office to track what Elections Canada is reporting. Pencil, paper, eyeballs – pretty much infallible. Being a software engineer by day, Whenever I hear electronic voting is coming I shudder.
Because the left “thinks” that Obama has a right to be president they have lied, cheated, and committed fraud to get him there. And they see nothing wrong with it! Warped sense of right and wrong. This is why they favour tyrants over lawfully elected leaders. This is why they would be better off living in third world countries. And if they can’t move to one they will turn their own into a dump to suit themselves. Sad and pathetic people. Now I worry about the leftist retards in Canada and how far they will go to illegally insert an unqualified idiot like Turdo into power.
Democrats have a huge problem with people having to show proper identification to vote. There are many lefties who are okay with women voting while their faces are covered, ostensibly for religious reasons. Proven fraud notwithstanding,there are many lefties who believe citizens and even dual citizens should be able to vote over the interweb using a computer from wherever on earth such a person might be on election day. At the same time the lefties think that all guns should be registered and mandatory invasive background checks should be done on citizens who have had spotless criminal records for their entire lives. Even though statistics show clearly that ethics murdering ethics in Democrat run cities such as Chicago, Detroit and DC are where many or most gun deaths occur, the Democratic party wants no part in disarming much less incarcerating the perpetrators (aka: their voter base). But they demagogue endlessly to keep tax payers from buying a gun suitable to protect themselves and their families. Gun sales skyrocketing in the US you say? Now why would that be?
I refuse to ever vote again until all voters are required to provide ID. Until then the act of voting is a farce.
Now ew know why the Democrats do not want voter id.
I suspect that this woman is just the tip of the iceberg.
Seriously? Her name is “Melowese”? Reminds me of this:
The Jacksun Rises
RN, I’m a software designer as well. Totally agree with you that such machines offer an easy and virtually untraceable way to fix an election. Our current system works well – we always have a result by midnight. No need to change it, IMHO.
Vote early, vote often.
Systemic fraud seems to be the progressives style.
What would you expect from people, whose stated policy is to not admit what they plan for you?
It is highly probable that the US voter is nowhere near as stupid as the media pretends, that with systemic fraud and with media complicity the election was stolen.
Computerized voting systems are wonderful tools.
For committing fraud and limiting accountability.
Fraud would also explain Obama’s attitude toward the media.
Beneath contempt even from a beneficiary?
Yes the left inflated their side of the equation which pales in comparison to their deflation of the right’s vote count. Given the number of “broken glass” republicans (those republican voters who would have crawled over broken glass to get rid of Obumbler there is no way other than electronic vote suppression that the Republican vote was less than it was for the old fogy and the hot VP candidate.
*snicker* Six times my auntie, that’s just the times Jezebel will cop to. Six “forties” doesn’t an Obama victory party make.
RN: Our “voter ID” system is so much security theatre. Someone showing up to vote will assuredly not be asked for proof he is a subject of the Queen of Canada, like a birth certificate or passport.
Any jackass whose cousin Mohammed invited him to stay as a permanent “tourist” can vote Liberal or NDP in a federal election, if Mohammed asks him to do so. All he has to do is one of the following:
1. Provide a government issued ID with photo, name and address (read: “Buy as many fake drivers’ licenses with fake names and addresses as Mohammed can afford”);
2. Provide two pieces of ID without photo, one with your address, both with his name on it (Read: “Dig a hydro bill out of a neighbouring trash can, and buy a fake medicare card with the same name on it”);
3. “Take an oath and have an elector who knows [him] vouch for [him]. This person must have authorized identification and be from the same polling division as [him]. This person can only vouch for one person.” (Read: “If you can’t speak English well enough to lie convincingly, bring Mohammed and have him do the lying for you; his imam will help the two of you get your story straight.”)
If we were at all serious, we’d have a system like Mexico’s. Nobody can vote without an ID card issued by the federal elections board, and the board will not give you one unless you can prove you’re a Mexican citizen. If Alberta had done something similar, Danielle Smith might well be premier of Alberta today.
Voter fraud committed by someone in the demographic group that commits 80% of all crimes in the USA despite being only 12% of the population?
why would anyone be surprised?
Yes I mean blacks.
Wonder what happened with the voter machines that were siezed by the FBI shortly after the election.
Maybe they recalibrated them before testing then found nothing wrong.
Maybe they stole the election maybe they didn’t (I believe they did) but they sure as hell stole the future generations ability to think for themselves.
It seems that the major moves in the People Control (AKA Gun Control) is focused on those that do not live in the same areas that the overwhelming amount of murders occurs. Lot’s of it is focused on the folks that live anywhere near these jungles. Just what a fella needs. Being disarmed when deadly & stupid danger is just miles away. Lovely, just frigging lovely.
I stand corrected and in agreement with some of the posts after mine – identifying the voter as valid prior to the casting of their ballot is a terrible process in our system, and is more on point with the article. I do believe however that the way we scrutinize ballots, count them, and report results works very well. Kinda liking a hybrid of Canada + Mexico from what I read above…
This article doesn’t even scratch the surface, I’m sure.
There must be a public debate of those who want voter identification and those who don’t. Use this criminal and others like her as sound reasons why a simple driver’s license is democracy’s friend.
Granted, the Canadian system is pretty straightforward, but as you describe it, it gets ugly if there’s >1 office on the ballot. Even the city election we just completed here had three issues, two city-wide (mayor and a referendum) and one by riding (city council). In November, we had six, and the outlying towns had seven or eight (some of which were “vote for more than one”, and those are a lot trickier).
And I can think of some “hijinks” you can pull with old-fashioned ballots (conveniently “losing” some of them, or sneaking in some counterfeits). That said, the best system I can think of is optical-scan ballots, sorted by a simple machine with by-hand checks to make sure they are all in the right pile, and both machine and hand counts of the number per pile.
(Disclosure: my county uses optical-scan ballots, although I don’t know how they are counted. Paperless ballots are used only as an assistive technology for those whose disabilities don’t allow them to fill out the standard ballot, and I can’t object to that–although it would be best for the machine to print a scannable ballot at the end.)