“When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal”

8 Replies to ““When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal””

1. In an amazing coincidence, the Predator B drones on order for the Dept. of Homeland Security are the type which mount Hellfire air-to-ground missiles. Currently being used by President Barry “The One” Obamarama to kill people and break things overseas from the comfort of his wing chair in the White House.
   http://phantomsoapbox.blogspot.ca/2013/03/this-is-getting-harder-to-adequately.html
   We are however assured by Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano that they would -never- do such a thing. Never. Perish the thought. Can’t happen. Nuh uh. No way Jose. Ixnay on the isslesmay.
   So the scenario of Barry lobbing an AG through the window of Tea Party headquarters as they plot their sinister overthrow of his just and good rule… well that’s just silly!

2. I often wonder what Bush thought about how his patriot act would be used if a government hostile to red state America ever came to power.
   Massive expansion and arming of DHS,TSA,ATF,- Billions of rounds of Ammo, new armored troop carriers for domestic deployment, unwarranted massive internet and communications surveillance, unwarranted check stops and frisking, spy drones, now armed drone attack authorization – Nawwww that’s all conspiracy tinfoil hat stuff.

3. That means self defense against the prez is legal for American citizens too (after careful examination of circumstances of course).

4. Well ya know….it all boils down to whose ox is gonna get gored…or droned…
   This ain’t no simple matter.
   It is widely diseminated that on 911, that interceptors had been directed at that airliner that crashed in Pennsylvania….weapons free….if fact there is a critical mass which believe/suspects that it WAS shot down.
   Well despite my aversion to this anticipated drone campaign by Maobama against his political foes/critics…..in truth that weapons free hypothesis would have been a good call…
   Tain’t right. tain’t wrong, just is……
   However, the unconfirmed reality is that NO armed USAF interceptors were available that day due to some arcane maintainence thingy….and that the only armed aircraft readily available were Canadian. Yep once agin the fleet was at anchor and the aircraft were lined up in neat rows in the open….
   Anybody who thinks they understand ain’t been properly briefed.
   The scenario of the military easily crushing armed resistance is yet another vague spectre…..not cut and dried in the least.
   Too many variables…….

5. “The law is the will of the Prince.”
   Hell, the US isn’t even getting a constitutional monarchy.
   

6. Phantom…you make a good point in reference to the ‘use’ in case of riots when the checks bounce.
   Somehow I have always felt that was ‘the plan’. Obama has never had a vision for the USA. He won’t be satisfied until a socialist uprising topples America.

7. Late with his budget, once again, illegal but not for the ‘not-a-dictator’.
   How about Not a President.
   http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/once-again-obama-suggests-laws-don-t-apply-him_706540.html

8. I hate to rain on the Statist morons parade but killing anyone in a country you have not declared war against is against the law. All the drone strikes in Pakistan were illegal. Period. Arresting people without due process is illegal as well. Random TSA stop checks are illegal as to.
   Now that people realize it may happen in the USA all of a sudden it is a big concern. It is too late now. They didn’t do anything when they passed the Patriot Act and now they are having regrets.
   Some say there is a fine line between fascism and socialism. Frankly I can not see any difference.