The Sound Of Settled Science

[Principia Scientific International] are adamant that they have compellingly debunked what a generation of government climatologists incorrectly assumed ie that the flow of radiation in the Earth atmosphere is indicative of the flow of heat. PSI scientists confirm that the issue was never really about whether radiation moves freely about in the atmosphere (it does), the big question should have been whether once it has arrived at the surface: does it get more than one go at generating heat(ie” back radiation” heating)? Postma and his PSI colleagues say “no” because no such phenomenon as “back radiation heating” is cited in any thermodynamics textbooks nor has any such effect been measured empirically. Also all “back radiation” graphics have been removed from Nasa publications.

Related – THE world’s climate has cooled during 2011 and 2012, temperature data from Britain’s Met Office reveals — just before this year’s talks on cutting global greenhouse gas emissions.

15 Replies to “The Sound Of Settled Science”

  1. Meanwhile Canada’s Conservative government shells out $400 million of taxpayer money annually “to help developing countries reduce their emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change.”
    Source:Environment Canada, http://www.ec.gc.ca

  2. I agree ith Rizawn, Canada will continue to go along with any Climate Change/Globel Warming treaties the will have to be signed … they always have and will continue to.
    Government of Canada fears Dr Fruit Fly and enviroMENTALists … the present government has no backbone when it comes to the truth of these lies … watch Canada follow the USA on carbon tax and cap and trade – because the said they would.
    The Government of Canada has done some great things for Canada … but like abortion and capital punishment, they will not touch the sacred cow of enviroMENTALists – sad, very sad.

  3. Clown Party said: “they will not touch the sacred cow of enviroMENTALists -”
    Sure they will. Already have. But because Harper is not an -idiot- he’s doing it very sllooowwwwllllyyyy. And behind the scenes, where the papers can’t see and so won’t scream.
    A grant cancelled here, a think-tank de-funded there, a few hundred bureaucrats laid off as was done this year, pretty soon you’re talking real change.
    Things are best done one little bite at a time. Remember, the gimme gimme generation just re-elected the worst president in 100 years down south. Do you really want to be saying Prime Minister Trudeau again? I don’t. So I support the slow motion strangulation of the Liberal Party in the government bureaucracy.
    One implacable step at a time, tiny cut by tiny cut, this is how we roll back the insanity.

  4. I’ve been a skeptic for a decade now, and never have I run into PSI before. What I’m reading of their work isn’t very good. For instance, to say that backwarming isn’t mentioned on NASA anymore is hardly a scientific proof.

  5. I see the second article includes the new climate change phrase of the season “global temperatures are still well above the long-term average”. I’ve noticed that this phrase has proliferated since the temperatures have remained unchanged for the last 16 years despite a significant increase in MM-CO2 emissions.
    Does anyone know how the long term average is calculated? The period since the 1880s (the end of the little ice age)? The 30 year period centered around the 1970s (when global cooling was all the rage)? Or some other period?
    I only ask because young earth warmers tend to forget the “long term” is a subjective measurement. For instance, for humans this is a useful long term temp chart.
    http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/esper_2012_fig4.png
    Clearly the Roman era was filled were Gaia destroying madmen.

  6. TrueNorthist, I agree, well said Phantom. Even though it hurts to be so patient, that I sometimes fear they are lukewarm on many issues.

  7. Yeah patience is a virtue.
    Remember we only got here because we allowed the lefties/marxists/crazies to slowly boil us like the frog. Harper et al are effectively reversing the process.
    I luv it.

  8. Your putting forth scientific illiteracy as support of the non-AGW argument. The theories espoused at the link show a decided lack of understanding of physics.
    The problem with AGW theory is not that the fundamental principle is wrong…it’s that there are a million confounding factors that are never accounted for in “the models,” and observations so far have not managed to be matched by any of these theories.

  9. From the second article: “THE world’s climate has cooled during 2011 and 2012, temperature data from Britain’s Met Office reveals — just before this year’s talks on cutting global greenhouse gas emissions.
    The figures show that, although global temperatures are still well above the long-term average, they have fallen significantly since the record seen in 2010.
    The findings could prove politically sensitive, coming ahead of the United Nation’s climate summit in Doha, Qatar, where the global system for regulating greenhouse gas emissions faces collapse.” end quote.
    ——————————————
    Actually the record wasn’t set in 2010, that was just a claim made in November of that year, before the year was over. When all the data for the year was in, 2010 wasn’t even in contention for the top.
    Keeping that in mind, this article is premature. 2012 isn’t over so we won’t know if it actually cooled until all data for that year is in.

  10. It wouldn’t matter if an Angel came from heaven to pronounce that Global warming was insane. The lust for the revenue from to many powerful venues(mostly liberal) would obscure it. To many people stand to make a fortune on this bunco scam. This to the Political class is like finding the leprechauns pot of gold. How to tax till your society bleeds for an out of control Government behemoth.

  11. Science, economics and truth have no place in the debate against global warming, an emotional way that appeals to the stupid must be found.

Navigation