In total, there are 21 districts in Cleveland where Mr. Romney received precisely 0 votes. In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote. And naturally, in one of the districts where Obama won 100% of the vote, there was 100% turnout. What a coincidence!
Now Hugo Chavez’ voting machine will be in demand all over the world.
Simple statistical analysis makes these results fail the sniff test.
Then the unlikeyhood of that(or any) demographic actually, legitimately all going out to vote.
Worth noting….OBOZO failed to win ANY state with photo ID..in place.
Suck it up. Romney lost.
@ Kitty: Suck it up yourself, for the next four years…
These are the results you would expect in the Cleveland Soviet Socialist Republic (CSSR).
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
None of this is surprising or evidence of fraud. That is Cleveland.
And yet, not one legal challenge from the GOP on what was obviously a stolen election.
Voters around the block at every polling station waiting for hours to vote, but 5 million less showed up than the previous lacklustre McCain showing?
Wonder how long till there’s a military coup?
America has become a 3rd World Banana Republic. And, for the most part, nobody cares.
Never thought this would happen in my lifetime.
I beleive i stated this in one of the threads before the election with the exact same title.
Intuition?
hmm!
I beleive i stated this in one of the threads before the election with the exact same title.
Intuition?
hmm!
Herd animals vote!
“If you are not cheating, you are not trying”.
It was well-known that Romney would have to win by a significant margin once the ‘fraud multiplier’ was worked into the final numbers. So well-known that it should have been worked-in as a constant in Romney’s victory formula. It’s clear today that it was a mistake to anticipate an even, or close to even split amongst Democrat and Republican voters.
In the end it boils down to the popular vote, and Romney’s inability to get 52% of it. 52% of the popular vote would likely have given him Florida, Ohio and the other states he needed for victory.
The bottom line is… Mitt Romney was not persuasive enough in his own argument for himself. He was not able to clearly articulate to the public the necessity to abandon failed socialist policies and return to fiscal conservative policies.
THIS is why I supported Newt Gingrich through the primary season. Gingrich’s ability to speak concisely and plainly about complex issues was a requirement this election, and his frame of reference is far vaster that anyone who was vying for President this year. In an election where the debates were so prominent, it might have been wise to have the best debater on the stage.
All of that said, I doubt Gingrich would have had the discipline to run an effective campaign and beat the President. He had too many weaknesses that made him vulnerable. I believe today that Mitt Romney was the best candidate available; but, the one important skillset he was missing, is exactly the skillset that Gingrich brought to the table.
Life is a biatch.
In Soviet America, Vote counts you!
Having such vote pattern in some areas is nothing new.
During the 1995 Quebec referendum there was report that some voting precinct in heavily federalist Jewish areas of Montreal had 0 “Oui” voting ballot.
Suck it up. Romney lost
Obama is racking up deficits per citizen per year 342% higher than Harper is on Canadians.
Suck that up Kitty
Indiana Homez – I agree with you that, as far as the ability to lay out an argument in simple, concise and yet accurate terms, Newt Gingrich was the choice. I supported him for that reason, but admit that his baggage was pretty heavy. I wonder how much it would have mattered.
I basically supported Perry, and still consider him excellent. His problem was that his recent back surgery and pain mediation tripped him up in the primary debates and I doubt if he would have been sufficiently recovered for a campaign. But, his approach to the economy, illegals and other issues, was admirable in my view.
The GOP have to continue to focus on the axioms of small non-intrusive government, low taxes, non-intrusive regulations, tax reform, entitlement reform – and – an amnesty for illegals to give them something akin to our Permanent Residency status. That would move them out of the black market and illegal economy and into tax-contributing participants.
And, above all, the GOP should stay out of social issues. I know the Democrats wallow in them, but these should not be the domain of a federal government. That only takes place in a totalitarian Islamic or communist government. Social issues belong to the people. Not to government and should be decided by the people at the state level by referendum. Not by a government or a political party.
Can you even imagine the welfare rate in these neighborhoods?
Oh cripes quit crying already. Romney lost Obama won fair and square. Deal with it.
None of these observations amount to a tinkers damn when taken as part of the demise of western civilization. When a society is taught that they can vote for an improved standard of living without working for it, then eventually the end will come.
watch and enjoy!
LAS, “fair and square”
You crack me up.
no, wait. You were serious?
Get help LAS.
Change your meds.
Something.
Et
I was not impressed with rp after his first debate; but, rp grew on me over time for the reasons you mentioned. That, and a little sympathy I think.lol
My favorite attribute of rp’s though, was/is his humility. That counts big with me, and Mitt had plenty of it also.
Cheers.
To Kitty and LAS – sticking your fingers in your ears and going “nah nah na nah na” is going to get you nowhere. Or maybe I should say it is going to get you exactly what you asked for. Nothing like ignoring the obvious and trying to change the subject.
Good grief!!
“Buy American” is going to take on a whole new meaning. If the Americans think the Chinese, Arabs, Japanese, East Indians own big chunks of America now, wait until they go bankrupt and bigger pieces of America can be picked up at discounted wholesale prices.
There are makers and takers.
Let’s play a game. First one to figure out which group Kitty and LAS are in wins a Cleveland Voting Machine.
Oh, and Quebecois NDP separatiste…..no kidding!
of course…Kitty and LAS would be saying the exact same thing…..
…if Obama had lost….and these same staticis came out
…can’t blame that one on the keyboard
….. statistics
looks like it’s common for democrats to get a higher turnout….than they have registered voters
Look at this from ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
http://www.slcelections.com/Pdf%20Docs/2012%20General/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORT.pdf
Yep, quite the coincidence indeed that Barack Hussein Obama received 100% of the vote in those districts.
In fact, reminiscent of Obama’s namesake — Saddam Hussein — who during his final “democratic” election in Iraq received something like 99.5% of the vote in the entire country! But I always thought that sort of “democratic” phenomenon only occurred under Third World despots et al.
Oh well, Obama had to start somewhere — the road to a despotic regime is long and hard, but I’m sure that The One will eventually get there one corrupt district at a time.
More fraud. Florida. Allen West.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/heatherginsberg/2012/11/10/breaking_massive_voter_fraud_in_st_lucie_county_florida
I’m guessing Mia Love probably suffered the same fate.
Drudge has put a couple of links up to these stories but isn’t really pushing it. One wonders if either Drudge or Fox have the courage to run with this and try to really bring this out in the open. Somehow I doubt this is going to happen.
Not unlike Canadian elections when the Liberals harvested votes where they could get at them…how many nursing homes, group homes had 100% of the residents vote 100% Liberal.
Funny that ,eh?
To Kitty and LAS – sticking your fingers in your ears and going “nah nah na nah na” is going to get you nowhere.
Maybe you should actually come up with some evidence instead of vague innuendo. Like I said, this is a totally believable result.
In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote..
..computer glitch
Borrowing money from China to buy votes. Or just printing it because no-one will lend the US anymore.
The American electorate is simply in denial over alot of things. Unfortunately, reality will intrude. Just got back from vegas (sure has fun) and this thought occurred to me. And read steyn this am.
Borrowing money from China to buy votes. Or just printing it because no-one will lend the US anymore.
The American electorate is simply in denial over alot of things. Unfortunately, reality will intrude. Just got back from vegas (sure has fun) and this thought occurred to me. And read steyn this am.
The fanatic Dems organizing the vote hate the Republicans so much that they cannot bear to let a few pro-Romney votes slide through in order to appear legit.
A recount could prove interesting.
if this is true, it’s no wonder the u.n. wanted to monitor the outcome.
this isn’t even funny, if this is true, the vote counters are as courrupt as the obomination administration.
Honestly, if this can be proven true all hell should break loose.
I think the election win was a surprise, even for Obama. It doesn’t sense, considering when you have democrat polsters nervously admitting Romney leading; one I heard saying Obama was leading from behind. There needs to be an investigation.
If these facts stand up, it ought to be a massive scandal resulting in people going to a jail, a complete revamping of some states’ voting methods, and possibly some annulment of results.
So why do I get this feeling that it’ll get swept under the rug?
If the RNC doesn’t investigate these districts, they didn’t deserve to win this time – and won’t the next.
Expect the Left in Canada to be studying at the feet of the Democratic Party, after all their robocall gambit didn’t really get them very far last time so they’ll need new ideas for the next federal election.
Anyone that buys a 100% vote in that many districts is legitimate is delusional at best.
Anyone that buys a 100% vote in that many districts is legitimate is delusional at best.
Libertarians are Suckers: If 100% voter turnout is totally believable does it follow that 108% voter turnout is Super-Totally believable?
I think the election win was a surprise
Except for Nate Silver. And anyone following the polls.
As Obama stated confidently to Putin….lol. Relax till after the election I will have more flexibility…lol
Obama knew he was going to win.
Rigged top to bottom inside and out !!
IMHO I don’t believe there was election fraud, after all 140% of registered voters in a county is easily explained, in fact LAS is going to explain it all for us. He is also going to explain the legality of; Obama posters in the polling booths, the ejected GOP poll watchers, the Obama paraphenalia worn by polling judges, the shredded voter registrations found in the dumpster in philly, the threat against the life of a GOP poll watcher, the physical assault on a voter by a Obama supporter, the use of NBP’s as an intimidation tactic, the numerous tweets by Obama supporters claiming to have voted multiple times. LAS is going to now explain the legality of all these issues for you dumbass conspiracy theorists.
The floor is yours LAS as I am going to get drunk and ignore the news for the next 4 years. Oh BTW since Libertarians are smarter you can also explain why they never win at election time..big smile…. big smile!
Who would have thought – the U.S. a banana republic
Syncrodox, yes, it’s 8% more believable.
*takes a sip of whiskey*
None of those things comes anywhere near accounting for Obama’s victory margin. These are really small potatoes.
Good idea Marc. LAS…you really don’t understand the electoral college system do you?
If I were a US conservative, I’d convert the Tea Party into a gigantic tax revolt. Seriously, if you simply stop paying taxes, how can the socialists distribute? More to the point, mass civil disobedience will pretty much end the statist dream. March 1 000 000 men to the IRS offices, and demand you “lock us all up for tax refusal…”