39 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. Hey, why the long face, Bunky?

    “Richard Duncan, formerly of the World Bank and chief economist at Blackhorse Asset Mgmt., says America’s $16 trillion federal debt has escalated into a ‘death spiral’…and that it could result in a depression so severe that he doesn’t ‘think our civilization could survive it.'”
    “Since the recession, noted economists including Laurence Kotlikoff, a former member of President Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers, have come to similar conclusions…”

    Meh, a couple hundred million-million here, a couple hundred million-million there…

    Kotlikoff estimates the true fiscal gap is $211 trillion when unfunded entitlements like Social Security and Medicare are included.

    Related:

    President Obama’s budget will add almost $11 trillion to the federal debt over the next ten years, according to the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee….[…]…The updated budget outlook contradicts the White House’s claims earlier this year. “Our budget will get us, over the next several years, to the point where we can look the American people in the eye and say we’re not adding to the debt anymore; we’re spending money that we have each year, and then we can work on bringing down our national debt,” White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew told CNN in February.

  2. On CBC.Ca tonight.
    (1)–“U.S. summer a global warming preview, scientists say”
    (After only 5 comments–this story is now closed to commenting.)
    (2)– “Droughts show global warming is ‘scientific fact”
    (No commenting allowed.)

  3. Brief story:
    I went to the opening of a new church Friday, 2,400-2,500 attended. Magnificent building (vaulted ceilings etc.), except the A/C units. The building has 4. These were speial green units. Needless to say two of them failed right away. It gets better. The units are fitted with CO2 sensors, you know, that deadly gas that is well known for killing church goers throughout the ages. Well at a certain level, the units start pulling outside air. It was 94 F. Entropy quickly ensued.

  4. ∞ ≠ ø, God is trying to tell the faithful something. (See, two can play THAT game.)

  5. Perhaps, but I was thinking that this was proof that elevated levels of CO2 does cause warming. Clearly this is a case of ACW.
    Anthropogenic Congregational Warming. 😉

  6. Well.Here’s one good thing Californicated has given us. Today (Aug 5th),is Int’l BEER Day.And on the Sunday before a long-weekend Monday in most of Canada!!

  7. In the story ∞ ≠ ø shared, if the AC unit controls had been correctly commissioned, calibrated and balanced that wouldn’t happen. It was a controls malfunction, nothing to do with their being ‘green’, and everything to do with someone not doing their job correctly.

  8. It seems that God just keeps trying to kill them. Hard to say whether they
    should find a more powerful god in the environmental movement, or stick with the one that can’t manage to
    get this particular job done 🙂

  9. “Richard Duncan, formerly of the World Bank and chief economist at Blackhorse Asset Mgmt., says America’s $16 trillion federal debt has escalated into a ‘death spiral’…
    Well, it’s a good thing money is just a medium of exchange, and not really worth anything…

  10. In the story ∞ ≠ ø shared, if the AC unit controls had been correctly commissioned, calibrated and balanced that wouldn’t happen. It was a controls malfunction, nothing to do with their being ‘green’, and everything to do with someone not doing their job correctly.
    Had to have been, everyone knows man creates perfectly and only goes off the rails operating his creation.

  11. This is just a google bomb, but there are rumors all over the web that Harry Reid is a pederast. Not only that, but his response to Ace of Spades seemed to suggest that pederasty was “cute” and was a complete non denial.

  12. Cbc’s ‘chick-fil-a’ story,close to 800 comments.
    Cbc’s other gay-religion story, ” Toronto woman facing deportation to Uganda granted stay “.
    Comments are not allowed.
    Islam gets a pass,again.

  13. Re: wallyj at August 5, 2012 11:07 AM
    The purpose of the Chick-Fil-A action was to help create a public environment in which corporate executives dare espouse only the current truth as defined by the left.
    Islam will cease getting a pass when Muslims start owning corporations.
    As Tom Hayden said, the issue is never the issue.

  14. EBD, 10:08 p.m. — Hey, why the long face, Bunky?
    Wasn’t it Stalin who said that one death is a tragedy, but a million deaths is a statistic? Regardless, this is disgusting news, and really starts to show the United States in a contemptible light.
    Comparing this situation to the one in Canada in the mid-1990s (and we’re no saints — we still have our own culprits, including the provincial governments in central Canada, who are behaving in a similarly reckless fashion) leads one to an initial conclusion that America faces two obstacles to dealing with this problem that Canada did not have to face at the time. Accordingly, the problem is much more intractable for them than it was for us.
    The first is an attitudinal one — putting it generously, there is no national consensus that this issue has to be dealt with. To be less generous, there is a significant element of the American public that doesn’t seem to get that there is a very big spending problem.
    The second is a structural one — the built-in conflict among the three branches of the U.S. government. Ironically, that conflict was originally intended to limit the power and size of government to interfere with and control the lives of Americans. The grim reality today is that the purpose of that conflict has been perverted — it is now a major impediment to reducing the role of the federal government.
    Before any decisions can be made on what entitlements, military programs, etc. are going to be cut, Americans are going to have figure out how they’re going to deal with these obstacles — not a very hopeful situation in the current context.

  15. Re: bluetech at August 4, 2012 10:19 PM
    Reading the comments pretty eliminates all hope for HuffPo’s enlightenment.

  16. Re: David Southam at August 5, 2012 11:33 AM
    Maybe I have too much faith in the American People, but I still believe that most Americans are reasonable enough to understand that their is no such thing as a free lunch. Evidence is there in that all the class warfare rhetoric has not turned Americans against Capitalism, Socialism is still a dirty word in American politics and all of the huge national political wins of the last thirty years have occurred in the context of a message of reducing the role of government.
    The real structural impediments are the powers of incumbency and of the administrative state that make any really major change in political direction possible only over the course of several elections.

  17. There’s a nice analysis at Hot Air between the Obama and Romney campaigns.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/opinion/sunday/douthat-mr-negative-vs-mr-complacent.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
    I think the GOP should be very careful; to my view, Obama can win re-election. He is essentially setting up a ‘continuity campaign’: ‘stick with me, we can lick this problem created by Bush, bit by slow bit, but it is slow and yet, we can do it’.
    And, he’s catering to his base and to the disenchanted by his class warfare saying that ‘it’s all due to the rich hoarding their money’…and defining Romney as one of this greedy group.
    Meanwhile, Romney’s focus on govt and its failures isn’t enough; he’s got to offer specific plans. I recall Harper’s first win, which he accomplished by offering five specific points, each basic and clear…..Romney has to offer a clear plan. Or, he’ll lose to Obama’s ‘continuity campaign’.

  18. ET @ 12:28 Mitt Romney cannot offer anything different because, as The Judge (Nepolitano) points out in this video “There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the two” (Mitt and Barak (Berry)). See for yourself…in their (O’Romoney/Robama) own words:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38

  19. Meads kicks it again!
    “It’s likely that Age of Shale hasn’t just postponed the return of coal: because of this extra time, there likely will never be another age in which coal is the dominant industrial fuel. It’s virtually certain that the total lifetime carbon footprint of the human race is going to be smaller with the new oil and gas sources than it would have been without them.
    Neither the world’s energy problems nor its climate issues are going away any time soon. Paradise is not beckoning just a few easy steps away. But the new availability of these energy sources is on balance a positive thing for environmentalists as much as for anyone else.
    Perhaps, and I know this is a heretical thought, but perhaps Gaia is smarter than the greens.
    http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2012/07/28/the-energy-revolution-4-hot-planet/

  20. “There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the two” (Mitt and Barak (Berry)).
    Except in the area of morals. Your wallet will survive, an immoral people won’t.

  21. Not a dime’s worth of difference between BHO and Mittens? Give me a break. The fact that Mittens would almost certainly sign an Obamacare repeal and BHO never would is difference enough.

  22. “Seventy-Five Years After Stalin’s Great “Operation Kulak” Reign of Terror”
    “Seventy-five years ago, on August 5, 1937, one of the most horrific — and most ignored — episodes in human history began. “Operation Kulak” (“kulak” meaning rich peasants) was the Soviet Union’s effort to repress those farmers who had a little more than other farmers (according, at least, to the definitions of the Communist Party), and who resisted collectivization. Soviet dictator Josef Stalin (pictured) had begun the development of “Operation Kulak” the previous month, when he contacted all the regional Party leaders as well as the NKVD (roughly the Soviet equivalent of the Gestapo and SS in Nazi Germany), asking each person for an estimate of the number of kulaks in their area. The NKVD issued Order 00447, which required that all kulaks and other “criminals” — members of the clergy, former officials of the Tsarist government, former party members, and former members of opposing political parties in Tsarist Russia — be either liquidated or sent to the Gulag.”
    http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/12321-seventy-five-years-after-stalins-great-operation-kulak-reign-of-terror
    …-
    “Case Study:
    The NKVD Mass Secret Operation n° 00447 (August 1937 – November 1938)”
    “Although Nikolai Ezhov signed the Order n° 00447, its instigator was Stalin himself.”
    http://www.massviolence.org/The-NKVD-Mass-Secret-Operation-no-00447-August-1937?artpage=2#outil_sommaire_1

  23. Sadistic Eristic: Another difference between Romney and Obama is glaring. Romney is PRO USA and Obama is ANTI USA. Obama needs a second term to run the USA right into the ground.

  24. @ chutzpahticular at August 5, 2012 9:49 PM
    They should have had a 3rd option, perhaps non-sense or bullshi*. At least the non brainwashed are ahead at the moment.

  25. peterj – there is another option; a staunch Conservative (in the true meaning of the word), a follower of the American Constitution (individual, not collective, rights): Dr. Ron Paul!
    Freedom loving people around the world are backing Ron Paul (Australia, New Zealand, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Switzerland, Canada….Why not Mitt Romney? Because Mitt is like one of those cut out dolls from the fifties flat and frail, without substance or intelligence. Almost everyone likes Ron Paul because he is real, he is on the side of the Constitution and of taxpayers; and of individual rights ( clinging to guns, gold, land and religion are natural God Given Rights – ORomny (health) care is not).
    BTW – Mitt has said that is going to replace not repeal Obamacare. Robama/Oromoney care; same thing and as Sorass said re: Barry/Mitty: ‘no difference’!
    Patriots will be voting for Ron Paul. I will be hoping and praying for Ron Paul. Ron Paul has ideas and principles that I admire. He is not pro life one day and pro choice the next – Dr. Paul delivered babies and rejoiced in life, Dr. Paul is not pro small business one day and the exporter of small business to China the next, Dr. Paul wants the Fed gument out of the environment/education/property/bedrooms/backyards/airports and he wants to bring the soldiers home to defend America, not die in far away countries for the sake of enriching the big pigs in the military complex. What is not to like about Dr. Paul?

Navigation