The Talk: Nonblack Version

60 Replies to “The Talk: Nonblack Version”

1. Fridge Logic
   Could the problem simply be giving the wrong answers, not axing the wrong question.

2. “Could the problem simply be giving the wrong answers, not axing the wrong question.”
   It is an interesting point, one that nobody has ever considered before, to my knowledge. You may be on to something.

3. If this were a women’s studies department, now is the part where we’d write a paper showing how penis size and IQ were negatively correlated.

4. “If this were a women’s studies department, now is the part where we’d write a paper showing how penis size and IQ were negatively correlated.”
   Are you volunteering as a participant?

5. It would depend on who’s administering the tests 😉
   Happy Easter to you too!

6. Large groups of people of any colour are generally a good thing to avoid. Mob mentality and all. Most whites were of low I.Q. seventy years ago as well. Pretty much tho, this link really makes me wonder about SDA contributors and posters. I do not think this is so much a conversation, as an educational indoctrination.

7. John Derbyshire tried having the honest talk about race the humorously designated Attorney General of the United States wanted, and paid the price, being canned by National Review.
   NR Editor Rich Lowry is a pussy of legendary renown. So is Jonah Goldberg.

8. I would note that while there are INDEED many good Blacks, 90% of the Black population gives the other 10% a bad name. The ONLY chance that a group of Blacks is good is if the group is small. And, as said above by Robert: “Large groups of people of any colour are generally a good thing to avoid“, with Blacks it is universal, while with OTHER groups it is merely a generalization that may or may not be accurate.

9. Who is worried as a result of Derb’s version. Is it blacks or its whites or its just people. And what exactly are they worried about – where is the offense. If its true – then its realy true. If its false, it stays that way and nothing changes. So where is the fuss?

10. “When it comes to avoiding trouble, the author neglects to mebntion that gatherings of punks should be avoided, irrespective of their skin color.”
    …and this guy was singled out because?
    Ah, but different skin colour is one more reason for the aforementioned punks to focus their attention on YOU. I’m White, therefore I am in greater danger from Black punks. That’s not racism, it’s reality. If I wasn’t White, that rule would likely be different.