32 Replies to “YNoKyoto”

  1. I caught on to the denier implication right away. It is a way to hi-jack the high ground with no basis of proof. Vilify when you have no hope of winning, steal the prize because you can’t earn it.
    It becomes rote.

  2. Caught this on Antigreen dot com a while ago ….
    Yep it is a deliberate attempt to marginalize their opposition and intentionally invoked to draw the connection to fascists ….. but since the terms lying scum and fraud and scammer applies very justly to the originators of “climate change denier” and so come to think of it does the term fascist…… I won’t lose any sleep over the pejoratives I choose.

  3. I don’t mind being called a denier as long the hysterics doing the ad hominem don’t mind being called rent seeking whores or pathologically innumerate or watermelons or…………
    As Steyn says, we should all take insensitivity training to allow for unbridled free speech.

  4. Whoops … that was WUWT …. BTW … do you suppose that Ausi pol actually had a clue …. or just a green parrot speaking the words?

  5. It is extremely offensive to some because of its obvious reference to the Holocaust deniers. As a tool to silence skeptics it is just stupid. Making references to a group being kooks or conspiracy theorists only works if it is a fringe group. US polls show that 40-50% of people think that global warming is exaggerated*. At this level of support “deniers” are hardly a lunatic fringe. Warmists need to update their message, the more they use “deniers” the sillier they look.
    *http://hotair.com/archives/2011/03/14/gallup-poll-shows-global-warming-fears-losing-steam/

  6. US polls show that 50% of people think evolution isn’t real. Luckily most western nations are far better educated, and far less indoctrinated, than the American public.

  7. Resolved: trivializing the Holocaust by referring to one’s political enemies as Nazis, Hitler, etc. is offensive and unacceptable.
    Unless it’s conservatives doing it:
    – rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/25/stewart-busts-fox-news-nazi-references/#
    – mediamatters.org/blog/201007160034

  8. I don’t think anyone denies climate change. The climate changes all the time. What’s there to deny?
    Now, AGW is a different story. It’s debatable.

  9. Pretending to be concerned about ice that isn’t melting and polar bears that aren’t dying is stupid. Forming those erroneous beliefs into a branch of political thought and then using it to punish people who don’t share those beliefs is very fascist.
    End of story.

  10. From WUWT comments….
    “If taxes had a cooling effect…this would be an ice-box.”
    As far as evolution…”Creation Science” is silly junk science, Darwinian Evolution (survival of the fittest) is now questionable in IMHO….however the role of magnetic reversals seems to have merit.
    recommended reading:
    “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps”
    Robert Felix—Sugarhouse Publishing

  11. “Climate Change Denier” is in truth explicitly and deliberately connected by hard core greenies to the Holocaust. It was coined for that purpose, and they came out and said Global Warming(TM) -was- the Holocaust, and that Western Civilization was to blame for it.
    Typical piece of projection, you ask any Greenie what should be done about Humanity, if they answer honestly they’ll say it should be reduced by three quarters at least, and as soon as possible. They dream of empty cities with a few hippies pulling rickshaws full of organically grown hemp.
    Oh and Lefties? Hitler was from your side of the aisle. National -Socialist-, remember? Comparing the DemocRats and Lieberals to the Nazis is entirely reasonable, given their propaganda, programs and policies (with one obvious exception) are virtually identical.

  12. Robert Felix? Really??
    I guess I shouldn’t be surprised – this IS the “Science Doesn’t Apply” blog, after all. It’s just funny that you would reject the well-established link between greenhouse gases and an increase in global temperature, while claiming that his garbage “seems to have merit”. There’s a reason the guy has never published any peer reviewed research, and why his only public appearances are on late-night radio shows more commonly known for conspiracy-mongering than science-reporting. His “theories” about magnetic reversal are laughable, and his book is full of errors that would make a physics undergrad blush. Worst of all, even the most rudimentary research would have told you that our ancestral species – Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, etc – survived multiple shifts of the magnetic field without any discernible effect.
    If you’re looking to dismiss evolutionary science, you’re almost better off going with the “god created everything 6,000 years ago” scenario.

  13. Funny you should mention that, Alex, with AGW being a religion with a belief system very similar to other fundamentalists religions – absolute obedience, sacred symbols, preachers, original sin, redemption, heresy.
    The fact remains that global warming skepticism has been losing ground not just in the US but even in the secular EU states and places such as India. Calling researchers insulting names rather than debating them (Re:James Cameron, Suzuki, Gore) is indicative of those who fear critical analysis.

  14. It’s just funny that you would reject the well-established link between greenhouse gases and an increase in global temperature…yada yada
    It’s IS an established fact that green house gas concentrations are contiuing to rise and that global temperatures have been falling for over a decade.
    The hypothesis that the green house gasses are a driver of temperature increase has been undeniably falsified.

  15. Of course Al Gore will insure your carbon credits will also go to help the parallel temperature increases on Mars.
    We may have a happy rainbow society of gay Muslim black men hanging out with young intellectual white yuppies there someday you know. Think ahead people, and pay up now, Andy Dick and “Alex” have a dream.

  16. “The hypothesis that the green house gasses are a driver of temperature increase has been undeniably falsified.”
    😀
    This is why I love coming to SDA – it’s like stepping through the doorway into an Evil Parallel Universe. Star Trek could have gotten years worth of material out of you people.

  17. “…reject the well-established link between greenhouse gases and an increase in global temperature…”
    Really? What well-established link would that be. Alex?
    The one that caused the large temperature rise in the 1930s before the large scale emission of CO2?
    The one that caused temperature decline in the 1960s and ’70s after the start of the large rise in C02 concentration?
    The large temperature rise during the Holocene despite a drop in CO2?
    The fact that every major change in global temperature for the last half billion years has been FOLLOWED, not PRECEDED, by a change in CO2?
    Like the rest of the green scum, Alex, you confuse cause and effect deliberately to reach a predetermined conclusion.
    Now, when you can provide answers to all of the above, we can talk.
    Until then, get lost.

  18. Oh my. Looks like “the right” is inheriting some of the faux sensitivities of the left”.
    Call me a denier all you want, as long as I can call you ‘fool’, I don’t care.

  19. Who’s thinking is muddled now, dear Alex? You once accused me of having muddled thinking when I justly accused you of committing the ad hominem fallacy (oh, and you also suggested I “take my purse and go home” — which I guess, under your reasoning, also doesn’t qualify as ad hominem either).
    Of course, like many of your ilk, you likely don’t remember. Your entire debating technique is to simply throw out unthinking and inflammatory rhetoric based on no logic whatsoever. Then you sit back and see what sticks.
    Sad, really. Not sure why I’m even giving you the time of day.

  20. Alex..really? that’s the best you can do?
    Guess so.
    Meanwhile here in reality, we’ve had one long, and still on-going freakin’ cold winter.
    Winters are getting colder, summer, what little we’ve had of it recently, shorter, and cooler.
    It was to cool of a summer the past couple we didn’t bother to fill the pool, or have to turn any fans on.
    But somehow the delusional keep blathering on in their demented religion of “OMG THE EARTH IS DANGEROUSLY WARMING”.
    Alex, Don’t let facts get in the way of your Star Trekkie fantasy world you seem to live in.
    …and you can come help shovel my driveway of snow..

  21. “it’s like stepping through the doorway into an Evil Parallel Universe. Star Trek could have”
    Al puts on big goofy plastic ears and a zip-up jumpsuit to mock other people.
    Looks good on ya.
    You’re not really playing with a fully charged phazer are you?
    Sticks and stones will break my bones but Alex is retarded.
    You lose again Captain Jerk.

  22. I guess the Evil Parallel Universe is the real world. Where it’s pretty damned cold for time of year.

  23. Alex, calling people who disagree with you “evil” isn’t going to wash around here, or anywhere thinking people hang out. So FOAD, you thwarted little toad.
    And while you’re busy f*cking off, you can check out Wattsupwiththat, the Climategate Timeline, Surfacestations, etc. Read the paper by the German physicists who have provicded excellent evidence that there is no such thing as the greenhouse effect. Get out of your mommy’s basement and your nest of stinky blankets, drop the self-imposed blinkers, and stop being such a stupid, smarmy, geeky, unjustifably egotistical ASSHOLE!

  24. // THE Liberal Party has accused Julia Gillard of drawing parallels between climate change and the Holocaust
    &
    “When you stop denying the climate science, we’ll stop calling you a denier. //
    The parallel is not with the Holocaust.
    It is with the type of “sceptic” who denies something in the face of clear evidence, who confuses assertion with evidence, who manufactures bogus arguments, exaggerates the significance of uncertainties , imputes motives, etc
    “Sceptic” is certainly the wrong word. Denier fits.
    And since the denial is of climate change ….
    But of course it is meant to be offensive. Just like holocaust denier. We must all treasure the right to be offensive.
    e.g.
    Abbott won’t apologise for climate rally abuse
    // Standing in front of a banner that read “JuLIAR, Bob Brown’s Bitch”, Tony Abbott’s speech was punctuated by chants of “ditch the bitch” and “liar, liar”.
    Shortly afterwards he said the crowd was “a representative snapshot of middle Australia”. //
    But then he did.
    Question 685
    Who will win the carbon tax war?
    Julia Gillard 64%
    Tony Abbott 36%

  25. “Who’s thinking is muddled now, dear Alex?”
    It’s spelled “whose”, so I’m gonna go with “yours”.
    “Alex, calling people who disagree with you “evil” isn’t …”
    … what I was doing. Don’t get your panties in a bunch just because you can’t understand a particular phrase.
    “Read the paper by the German physicists who have provicded excellent evidence that there is no such thing as the greenhouse effect”
    Funny 🙂 I’ll bet you also have one by Latvian Geologists “proving” that the earth is 6,000 years old, don’t you?

  26. Alex, so far you have brought absolutely nothing to the table as far as “scientific” evidence for your bizarre dirt-worshiping religion.
    Let me clue you in.
    I work outside, my fav leisure activity, also outside.
    I am acutely aware of the climate.
    I’m also aware that I wear thermal underwear, 5 layers of clothing to stay warm.
    The real “deniers” are buffoons like you you refuse to see the reality.
    It’s cold outside.
    It does not snow because it’s hot out.
    Alex, you have shot your wad on the science issue, you have zero credibility.
    The only people who continue in this charade of “DANGEROUSLY WARMING” BS, are the rent-seeking lying whores…or…the most “abysmally ignorant of anything science” idiots.
    Tell me, Alex, which camp are you in:)

  27. “I work outside, my fav leisure activity, also outside.”
    Ah, an expert! I bow to your superior knowledge. Tomorrow, I’m gonna go get my engine rebuilt by a guy who drives a lot.

  28. Wow, still nothing brought to the table.
    It’s cold out…because it’s dangerously hot..buhahahahahahahahahaahah…whatta “science”..hahahahahahahahahah
    Still waiting for the non-existent evidence…still…
    Stop being such a denier Alex, time to accept reality.

Navigation