Talking head number one: “At six o’clock, no more doubt: climate change is happening, and we are to blame!”
Talking head number two: “Leading scientists predict that by the end of the century some parts of Europe will be too hot to live in!”
That’s awfully hot.
Where are the BBC’s retirement funds invested?
In the green agenda, they’re all bought in.
Exactly as it states at 3.20 – 3.40 in the video.
Let them starve in their old age. Although I wish I could see them repeatedly burning their white english skin while sunning themselves on the southern spanish coast.
I would say by the end of the century, some parts of Europe will be too Islamic to live in.
Of course, they like it hot, so it seems like a good fit.
AGW* Progress Report.
…-
“Wind on trial”
“WIND TURBINES: ONTARIO COURT ASKED TO STRIKE DOWN PART OF THE GREEN ENERGY ACT(sic)”
“A burgeoning billion-dollar industry and the political fortunes of Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals may turn on a legal challenge by a single man whose day in court arrives Monday.
Ian Hanna lives far away from the corridors of power in Queens Park and Bay Street in a century-old farmhouse on Big Island in Prince Edward County. But Monday he finds himself in the epicentre of a debate that could shape the economic future of the province and the political fate of the ruling Liberals.
It’s a fight over wind turbines that have been rising across Ontario with ever greater frequency, an industry the Liberal government has subsidized with plans to double its energy capacity in this year alone.”
http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2011/01/24/17007701.html
…-
“Obama Climate Adviser Browner to Step Down”
“WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s top adviser on energy and climate matters is stepping down, two White House officials confirmed Monday. The departure of Carol Browner underscores any prospects for a major White House push on climate change, given that such efforts have little chance of succeeding on Capitol Hill.
Browner, a former Environmental Protection Agency administrator under President Bill Clinton, will be leaving the White House just as Republicans in Congress prepare to take on the Obama administration over global warming and the administration’s response to the massive Gulf oil spill.
Browner successfully helped negotiate a deal with automakers boosting federal fuel economy standards and requiring the first-ever greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles. She also pushed for billions of dollars for renewable energy in the economic stimulus bill.
But the administration fell short on it key domestic priority of passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill to place a firm limit on the pollution blamed for global warming. Just after the November elections, which gave Republicans a majority of seats in the House, Obama admitted the legislation was dead.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/24/obamas-energy-advisor-step/
*H/T Liberal Citoyen Kyoto Dionky.
BBC insiders were knowing accomplices and cheerleaders of the “Global Warming” fraudsters who continue to pillage the British taxpayer. They all belong in jail.
By ‘too hot to live in.’ do they speak of car-b-que summers?
Ah, but the BBC is reporting this, this morning.
I don’t know about you, but – “Quebec City temperatures fell to -25C. Wind chill made it feel more like -40C” – isn’t especially newsworthy, unless you believe parts of the planet will be too hot to live in before too long.
The UK Green Party wants to ration energy use . . .
” Fuel rationing may be needed by 2020 in the U.K. to meet the government’s carbon emission targets, a panel of lawmakers said, suggesting an electronic trading system for energy quotas.
Under the system, called Tradable Energy Quotas, or TEQs, energy credits would be distributed free to every adult, who could then buy and sell surplus units, the London-based research group The Lean Economy Connection said today in a report commissioned by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Peak Oil. The multi-party panel of lawmakers looks at the impacts of declining fossil-fuel production.
Bloomberg. Fuel Rationing Needed By 2020 to Cut Co2 Emissions, Lawmakers Say.”
Of course in the fine print we find out that only 40% of the TEQ’s would be “free” . . . the rest would be sold.
The Green Party . . . providing newer, better definitions of Stupid.
Only media talking dead heads and brain dead polititians continue to tilt at windmills, while the intelligent common sense out here in the great unwashed, tilt away. From our save the planet toilets (that don’t flush), to our fuel in vehicles (that screws your warranty) to the future (power brownouts) we have let hippies and theives direct our policies, folls who are as bright as their squiggly bulbs.
The BBC became a propaganda machine for climate change zealots, says Peter Sissons… and I was treated as a lunatic for daring to dissent
http://tinyurl.com/48aqo26
No one knows about what the climate will be five years from now. The claims of the “scientists” is made up from a computer program made to come up with an answer that the “scientists” want and “journalists” will gladly spread as a propaganda machine.
The “journalists” are spreading propaganda that one suspect is full of omissions and subject to “creative journalism” that proposes that this or that species will be extinct a few years from now. To spread the propaganda is good for business though.
One thing though is 99% certain; all of the current AWG “scientists” will be extinct a hundred years from now.
The thing is, the “scientists” can say anything they want about climate. 50 years from now, nobody will hold them accountable for being wrong.
Even today, as their house of cards is crumbling one card at a time, they pick an event like global cooling and turn it into an argument in support of AWG.
The non scientists with real life observation and experience have to submit, otherwise they, the “scientists”, will call them just stupid.
The time has come where it’s no longer correct to think that sitting in our living room and making rude comments as these climate con artists spew their rubbish, disguised as news or science, that just being hip to the AGW con will roll back the BS.
We are far too polite with quacks, con men and BS artists these days. We need to get in their face. When some talking head pimps AGW doom/hysteria, phone in or write in and call him a bovine scatologist. Mock the dummies. Do it publicly. They deserve nothing but our contempt and public humiliation for the dangerous lies they repropagate.
Let’s get to it!
from WUTW comments . . these are live links there.
No contradictions in AGW Scientology. None.
“Jimbo says:
January 24, 2011 at 7:50 am ”
What you people don’t understand is that all science researchers, no matter what field, are jumping on the global warming bandwagon in a wild feeding frenzy of funds. Here is where some of the research funding went.
Warmer Northern Hemisphere winters because of global warming
Colder Northern Hemisphere winters because of global warming
Global warming to slow down the Earth’s rotation
Global warming to speed up the Earth’s rotation
North Atlantic Ocean has become less salty
North Atlantic Ocean has become more salty
Avalanches may increase
Avalanches may reduce
Plants move uphill due to global warming
Plants move downhill due to global warming
Declining coral calcification on the Great Barrier Reef due to global warming
Increasing coral calcification on the Great Barrier Reef due to global warming
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/24/another-mankind-as-evil-carbonator-even-way-back-then-study/#more-32341
Was Anthropological Global warming invented by the world’s most powerful elites as one of the means to globalize and control the world economies?
We all know the world technological advances and it’s wealth creation exploded due to man’s ever increasing use of fossil fuels.
The questions that remain are:
-Is the purpose of the lie to redistribute wealth like many believe; being of socialistic/marxist source and drive? Or,
-Is the purpose to drive up the cost of energy/reduce consumption power in order to extend and preserve the remaining but rapidly declining finite resources (The cheap exploitable stuff anyway) so to globally better control a world, that except for the African continent, is rapidly developing thus creating ever more middle class consumers?
Was Anthropological Global warming invented by the world’s most powerful elites as one of the means to globalize and control the world economies?
No.
It was invented by PM Margret Thatcher to break the British Coal Miner’s Union with an eye to the promotion of nuclear power to replace coal.
Very shortsighted.
Things might have gone differently if the Cold War hadn’t “ended”.
I’ve always said that the greatest shortcoming of Conservatives is their lack of imagination and foresight.
Like conservative Generals, they’re always fighting the last war with the lessons they’ve learned from it and failing to prepare for the new evolved battlespace that they never imagine could exist.
ot
So I was at Super Store yesterday and the cashier asked if I ‘brought bags?’. I told her ‘yes’, we recycle our bags. The bags we’ve recycled for years are the heavy-duty plastic bags that we purchased in 2002 (3 for 99 cents). At the time we purchased about 30 bags and have been using them since. Anyways, the cashier proceeded to tell me that using plastic bags is ‘irresponsible’ and not ‘green’. It was at that time I pulled-out my stack of Super Store Going Green Reusable Plastic Bags and waved it in her face and told her “don’t tell me these are not green or I will demand a refund for each and everyone of these bags your store sold me under false premise”. I proceeded to tell her that these bags are older than some of my kids and they are very environmental”. Anyways, I didn’t push the issue, and it was clear that the irony of the situation was lost on this old bat.
These grocery bags are gold, and I throw them in the face of an envirotard every opportunity I get.
As far as AGW goes; it’s a Ponzi scheme, and the scammers (the EU) are desperately trying to preserve their investment in our stupidity. Of all my political dreams, one the top of the list is the abolition of all things related to AGW. I loathe the thought, almost to the point of sicking-up, when I think of the potential for losing our sovereignty to foreign nations. I’ve griped about Boomers and their selfishness and lack of foresight; but this in my mind, is as egregious as any act from those Boomers and my generation will be just as culpable. It makes me sick!
I think they should make reusable shopping bags out of seal skin.
Collectivism at work. Patrick Moore hits the target squarely. Global warming theory, like Marxism is “elegant” to their proponents because both inescapably conclude that capitalism must be defeated and be replaced by collectivism.
The truth that capitalist, wealthy societies are cleaner cannot be accepted, it must be suppressed. Bridge solutions such a nuclear, instead of being embraced, continue to be villified with inaccurate, dated “facts” such as the buildup of nuclear waste. We are bad, bad, bad.
Also inescapable is the conclusion that collectivism must prevail to bring to heal the evil deniers and capitalists who rely on oil companies for money and influence.
It must ignore the obvious – that many people are locked into AGW orthodoxy to maintain their influence and phony baloney jobs.
They refuse to agree with another two obvious facts that if we are to stop using fossil fuels they must be replaced with something that is or nearly as efficient; that it will take at least 50 years to transform our economies away from oil.
Their “solution” will always be anti-capitalist, as Moore points out, no other approach is possible.
Because this solution is anti-freedom, it must be accompanied by ever increasing authoritarism to totalitarianism, where any dissent must be crushed.
“Hide the decline” is dismissed as a words that mean something else. Bogus computer models are continually used a proof. Scientists stay on the IPCC list of warmists despite their protestations.
The end (global socialism) justifies the means (jailing dissenters, dismantling economies). As global socialism fails, the warmist continue their contradictory argument that more collectivism is required.
No, misery will not (quite) be shared equally, as Churchill argued. Yes, economies will be devastated along with standards of living for most, but a few elitists (Gore, Suzuki etc) will gain influence and wealth. It’s already happening even if catastrophic climate change hasn’t.
Luckily for the world’s people and the environment, the warmists ability to frame and dominate the message is waning significantly.
It never really had a chance IMO, because once you reach into the taxpayers’ wallet, they let go of the tree they’re hugging and cover their back pocket to keep the collectivists out.
WTF do people watch CAGW climate porn? I’m so glad that I’ve totally tuned out the MSM but the problem now is how to educate the people that still think there is something to be gained by watching TV “news”. The only exposure I now get to the MSM is when I’m seeing a patient in hospital who happens to have a TV tuned to a “news” channel.
One of the things that needs to be done is to start going after organizations that have swallowed the CAGW meme and my plan for the evening is to send a letter to the College of Family Physicians which has come out in full support of the bogus science behind CAGW pre-Copenhagen.
Time to start hitting these statists really hard and I won’t be satisfied until a large number of the CAGW criminals are behind bars.