“… where she wrote about Fox News, Sun TV News and her connection to both of them I was seriously worried that I would learn that Ms. Mallick had slept with someone in my office.”
Related, indeed. The Mallicks in media seem to think the Canadians they smear don’t read newspapers. (Courtesy Jeremy).
Politicians, too.
… bringing new insight into “easy like sunday morning”.
Did she mean “OMG I slept with that guy too”? or only “OMG I slept with that guy”? I couldn’t tell.
Standards? well, he was a breathing warm body, so yeah, that’s a standard.
I found the comment “who’s going to pay for my ????”, interesting. There seems to be nothing at all for what she is responsible for. Cheers;
I’ve stopped being offended, or even surprised, by the Left’s continued notion that it is as pure as the driven snow (i.e. not agenda driven), and Fox News is racist and agenda-driven.
The opposition to Sun News, a channel that doesn’t even exist yet, is irrational and based on fear. Funny that, the Left calls the majority of Americans opposed, on sound principles, to Obama’s border policy, or the GaZamosque, etc., bigots rooted in fear of change. But, their opposition to a non-existent channel is somehow not agenda-driven. Heh. Funny that, indeed.
Malick is a nasty piece of work, perfectly at home in the Liberal dominated media. I say bring on Fox News North. Even if it is becomes right-wing, agenda-driven channel, it will be worth it to counter the Liberal cheer-leading of the existing channels, and for pure entertainment value watching the Leftards’ heads explode.
Sun News is needed, desperately, in whatever form it can manifest itself in. The fact Heather Malick can find mainstream work in Canadian journalism demonstrates the depths to which it has sunk.
We need a Sun News just so the CPC might get a clue about how their voter base feels about issues.
Our CPC MPs sure aren’t getting a clue from our e-mails ’cause they don’t bother reading them.
Who’s Heather Mallick? And the Toronto Star still calls itself a “news” paper? Are you kidding me?
🙂
What a miserable existence you people must lead. Whoever runs this blog and the people who visit it regular basis. You spend all day trying to prove that the right wing is superior to the left wing? That might be the saddest thing I have ever heard. What a waste of time! Here’s an idea, how about when issues arise, we, as Canadians find solutions that are best for the country. Period. We need to get rid of this left wing, right wing bullshit!!
Heather Mallickmyballs is a Looney Left Wing Liberal Fascist.
I would still sleep with her though if she begged
me
Love Brian Lilley. He’s on fire these days.
We can diss the Mallick all we want. She doesn’t care.
But when a peer has a go at her it’s great.
Not meaning to insult Lilley by referring to him as her ‘peer’…
Oh my god,’ I said aloud. ‘I slept with that guy.’
That would be the guy who now has one arm.
Would his name have been Wile E?
Joe 11:37 “We need to get rid of this left wing, right wing bullshit!!”
Joe, you’re half right
joe rogan, this is a political blog.
Politics is the art of getting your way.
Your, “Ah…can’t we all just get along?” is stupid, especially in the light of empirical evidence that demonstrates that human beings are political animals, that we all want to get our own way.
The primary difference between the Left and the Right is that the Left insists on getting their way with my money.
joerogen, like it or not, there is a political spectrum that, generally speaking, runs on a left-right axis.
A couple of points.
First, most folks would around here would tend to agree with your general sentiment, that the pols should get on with the business of governing in the interest of all citizens. If you have an objection to one, or more, of the posts, or the linked article, counter them specifically. Vapid, holier-than-thou rhetoric doesn’t accomplish much.
Second, getting back to that political axis I referenced (above), taking a closer look at that axis, I would make a simple observation based on my experience. Those who occupy the left of the spectrum tend to hold to victim-driven ideology. This ideology caters to specific groups, blocs of voters according to an artificial hierarchy. One result of this outlook is the Caledonia situation in Ontario, Muslim prayers in Paris, Sanctuary Cities in the U.S., and so on. Those who occupy the right of the spectrum will tend to support policies that empower the individual, reduce size of government, and apply one law for all — with a basic social safety net to be used as needed.
As my core, a priori, political beliefs include such things as one-law-for-all, then yes, rightists policies do offer the best solutions for the country.
I welcome your logical arguments against anything I’ve written above. Additional rhetoric need not apply.
Thanks Kate for getting the old heart rate waaaay up there so early on a Sunday morn.
“I was seriously worried that I would learn that Ms. Mallick had slept with someone in my office.”
Ewwwww! Brian! The thought of sleeping with this bug-ugly deranged harridan is enough to put a normal male off their beer for a week!
Stop it!
I slept with her. ANIMAL!
They should call her “jaws”, she’s awesome!
Shes got a small tasmanian devil inside her thigh.
But the bad part is her whining about men who use her…
My previous post is of course bs.
I have to respect someone, even if I just want to use them…..
I can only comment on Heather Mallice, based on my limited exposure to her prose.
Mentally she is a user and as usual with such ends up used and bitter.
She needs a dog or a cat.
“we feel a sickness in our soul” That, she should.
Politics is the art of getting your way.
Your, “Ah…can’t we all just get along?” is stupid, especially in the light of empirical evidence that demonstrates that human beings are political animals, that we all want to get our own way.
The primary difference between the Left and the Right is that the Left insists on getting their way with my money.
Succinct and spot-on.
“I did not want to have to phone my husband and say in a small sad voice, “Remember that guy I told you about, you know, that guy. Before we met. Well, he’s online and he’s portly.”
No, she thought it would be better to write up her secret in a newspaper for all to see, plus let her readers know that her husband had reassured her that she was not portly.
Me me me mee
Me me me mee
Whomever she slept with apparently grew up.
Sadly, Ms. Mallick is still waiting for Godot.
Hey Joe:
Go find something better to do with your life than perusing blogs you aimlessly wander into and criticizing those who participate therein.
There must be a good book you’re not reading right now on your iPad. Order another latte and that headache will go away.
Lefties all just want to get along,until they get in power.They then try to silence the opposition so that they dont have any.ALL socialist states have done just that.
Pay no heed to the Sun columns! According to Libtoad Ian Davey on today’s QP,Sun Newspapers ‘are for people that can’t read!’ How’s that for arrogance and ignorance? Tim Powers was on to respond,and Giggles didn’t bother to comment.
I’m thinking a man would need a great deal of booze to bed that wench. Why can’t we all get along Joe, well buttercup the left demand that we crawl around in the ditch so they can operate on an unlevel playing field ergo we’re tired of hitting the dirt to appease leftards.
> She needs a dog or a cat.
How unkind. I can’t imagine why a dog or cat would need or want to live with Heather Mallick. That’s cruelty to animals, that is.
Those who occupy the left of the spectrum tend to hold to victim-driven ideology. This ideology caters to specific groups, blocs of voters according to an artificial hierarchy. …
Those who occupy the right of the spectrum will tend to support policies that empower the individual, reduce size of government, and apply one law for all — with a basic social safety net to be used as needed.
Good summary. The crux of the matter is a fundamentally different understanding of rights and entitlements.
The Left believes that ‘bad objects’ make good people do bad things, and thus eliminating ‘bad objects’ will make a perfect world.
The Right believes that personal responsibility drives what a person does and any object can be used for good or bad purposes.
It’s all about free speech – just their free speech.
I woundn’t sleep with Mallick for all the beer in Canada!
Could the Brit’s just keep her for crying out loud ?
Malick lowers the value of socialist weemin every time she writes something, for the simple reason that it is what you may commonly describe as garbage.
Perhaps it the time some real women stand up and give her a good piece of their mind.
Heather Mallick, Michael Ignatieff, what do the have in common? A desire apparently to let us know that they actually had sex, they claim, with another live human being.
I guess they both really are fiction writers, unless, Hey! you thinkin’ what I’m thinkin’?
They bothered to read that column?
I took one look at the headline and decided that I had better things to do than humor the retarded.
The other day I read a column by her that was critical of a SUN TV channel. In her column she claimed that CBC was required to be “factually immaculate”. Yikes
Re Joseph Atkinson: “He favoured public ownership of gas, electric light, electric power, coalmines, oil wells, timber, pulp and paper, telephone, telegraph, radio, television, railways, airlines and streetcars” [but not newspapers]
None of these things should be “publicly owned”, which of course really means government-owned through a coercive monopoly.
The Charter of Rights includes “freedom of the press and other media of communication”, so technically the licensing of broadcasting outlets should be unconstitutional, just as licensing of newspapers would be.
As for the Star, it does not have to continue following the so-called “Atkinson principles” if it doesn’t want to. The notion of a covenant by which certain conditions are imposed by a property owner after his death (or other disposal of his property) is a violation of property rights, which do not exist in perpetuity. Once you no longer own something, you don’t have a say over it. You’ll have to trust whomever you disposed of your property to, but it’s now their property to do with as they see fit.
It must be the use of the hackneyed “Oh my God” that separates the “real” journalists of Mallick’s caliber from those who would lower the standards of journalism and discourse in Canada.