Oh man, doesn’t this…
 |
“Convention sources explain that the number “23” was chosen to commemorate the years the 61 year old Prime Ministerial wanna-be is thought to have actually resided in Canada.” |
… just take you back?
In related news – “you can take the professor out of the party, but … eh… nevermind.”
h/t Mike W.
Does an organ recipient have the right to refuse an organ from a dead gay/lesbian.
Will families be told the donation is coming from a gay/lesbian. If transplant takes place, and fails, can the family sue the liberals for wrongful death. And how do the msm like their new definition, thanks to an explanation of said motion at the convention.
There were supposedly 3000 people in Vancouver for this circus, but, watching all the sessions with voting, only about 400 were in the room to start. The highest vote for any motion was 310 for. And as the day went on fewer and fewer stayed to vote. It got so bad the chairman warned they may not have a quorum and have to suspend proceedings. And considering that ever motion that was debated was only debated for 4 minutes. 2 speakers for, 2 speakers against, for 1 minute each.
If the canucks end up losing the cup, how much blame will be put on iggy and the sweater and liberals in general. Those canuck fans can all vote conservative next elecction, as payback.
Re reducing poverty, sounds great but impossible to do. When stats Canada keeps raising the threshold of what income level denotes poverty.
What was the threshold from Stats Canada when this was first brought up by liberals about 20 yrs ago. What is it today-bingo poverty cured.
Stick OFF the ice, if I ever saw one.
He was shutout at his own photo op.