58 Replies to “ACORN”

  1. Rick
    I stand corrected. Seeing as how their are no links to refute your aspersions…you got me.
    Barry is in fact all that and a bag of chips.
    Syncro

  2. ACORN or an equivalent will show up here by next election. The left will make sure.
    Where always 3-5 years behind the US in most trends.

  3. A deafening silence with regards to GOP fraud and McCain’s involvement in ACORN…anyone have anything to say?

  4. Well Bar, nice try, that was an Immigration Rally in Flori-duh and ACORN was a Co-Co-Co-Co-Sponsor and sqeezed their endorsement on it. McCain was not there on an ACORN Ticket. Good try though.
    ,

  5. bar, nice try. It was pretty clear that the Dems stole PA in 2000. No voter ever died or moved in Philly for a decade, and they all voted.

  6. More Obama fraud, this time stealing money for the campaign.
    “a strange credit card charge appeared on their statement this month — a $2300 donation to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. The Larman’s say they don’t want this to be about their political affiliation, but they say they’re not about to give the Obama campaign any help from their pocketbook.”
    http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/Business/Detail?contentId=7599837&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=4.4.1
    Not to mention that they have collected 250 MILLION dollars in essentially untraceable under $250 contributions. Many of these from obviously fake names, and even names that were just dragging one’s finger accross the keyboard.

  7. Sorry Ratt but there were tons of ACORN signs and volunteers all over that rally, and ACORN was a co-sponsor, not a co-co-co-co-sponsor. ACORN agreed with McCain’s immigration reform bill, and as a result, McCain was more than happy to accept their support. Now he demonizes it with the same self-interest as when he enjoyed their support.
    What I’m really driving at here is that both parties are quite guilty of fraud and abuse of power when it comes to elections, so for McCain to demonize Obama for some organization that supports him’s supposed voter fraud allegations (of which none have been proven) is just election rhetoric.

  8. Tim,
    How clueless are you really? McCain has received 73 million in “essentially untraceable under 250$ contributions”. Why not examining McCain’s donations before pointing out the plank in someone elses eye?
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/fec_queries_mccain_campaign_on.html
    In the Times article that actually exposed Obama’s fake named donors, they totalled only 40,000 of fake name donations. How scandalous, I’m sure he could pay for 5 minutes of flying in a private jet with all that cash! I agree they should have rejected those donations, but lets get real here, 40,000$ out of 450 million? 0.008% of his campaign contributions? Not much of a scandal if you ask me when that single incident with McCain that I mentioned above involved around 10,000$ of over donations by only a handful of donors that they accepted.

Navigation