“Why are [Jack Layton and Stephane Dion] cynically instilling fear in Canadians for cheap partisan advantage?” *
51 Replies to “They’re Socialists. It’s Their Nature.”
Nah, new and mos write really badly. Never read anything by Haye.
“You have zero understanding of human psychology, of the nature of mass behavior.”
So which one are you – psychologist or social worker?
“Its how people behave when faced with certain choices.”
And you accused me of being too angry on another thread. The irony. As to the rest of what you said, is the issue here the choices people are faced with, or the use of fear to skew peoples perceptions of the choices they face. I am not sure what you are saying or where it fits in. But I’m tired, so it might just be me.
“Lose the so typically leftist condescension about what the readers and participants in SDA know and understand.”
Huh? I am hardly a leftist. I am just not as rightwing as some of you blind ideologues. Anything left of extreme extreme right seems to be ‘lefty’ here. I am not a leftist. Most people here are far-right nutcases. Relative to them, I am left, I suppose.
“No politician today can run a campaign on 1950s morality ”
Guess not. Because rudeness sells. Its macho and manly, eh. Average Joe Six Pack loves it. And Average Joe Six Pack votes. Average Joe Six Pack does not like politeness. Or so you imply.
“No company runs a business on it, no school teaches it.”
Really? Where do fairtrade goods fit in? Or the endless supply of religon classes and (in university) philosophy classes on the matter?
I said it once and I will say it again. I would rather have a university educated leader (if only because of the exposure it brings to people from other walks of life/professions/races) than I would an Average Joe Six Pack. Calculating or Impulsive? I prefer the former. You prefer the latter. Oh, and calm down.
Nah, new and mos write really badly. Never read anything by Haye.
“You have zero understanding of human psychology, of the nature of mass behavior.”
So which one are you – psychologist or social worker?
“Its how people behave when faced with certain choices.”
And you accused me of being too angry on another thread. The irony. As to the rest of what you said, is the issue here the choices people are faced with, or the use of fear to skew peoples perceptions of the choices they face. I am not sure what you are saying or where it fits in. But I’m tired, so it might just be me.
“Lose the so typically leftist condescension about what the readers and participants in SDA know and understand.”
Huh? I am hardly a leftist. I am just not as rightwing as some of you blind ideologues. Anything left of extreme extreme right seems to be ‘lefty’ here. I am not a leftist. Most people here are far-right nutcases. Relative to them, I am left, I suppose.
“No politician today can run a campaign on 1950s morality ”
Guess not. Because rudeness sells. Its macho and manly, eh. Average Joe Six Pack loves it. And Average Joe Six Pack votes. Average Joe Six Pack does not like politeness. Or so you imply.
“No company runs a business on it, no school teaches it.”
Really? Where do fairtrade goods fit in? Or the endless supply of religon classes and (in university) philosophy classes on the matter?
I said it once and I will say it again. I would rather have a university educated leader (if only because of the exposure it brings to people from other walks of life/professions/races) than I would an Average Joe Six Pack. Calculating or Impulsive? I prefer the former. You prefer the latter. Oh, and calm down.