Reader Tips

Good evening ladies and gentlemen, welcome to SDA Late Nite Radio. Tonight, for your delectation, here is Louis Armstrong singing Dixie Music Man (1947, 3:29). The last four seconds of this video are interesting too, in a meta-musical sense.

Shortly before his death, Satchmo said, “I think I had a beautiful life. I didn’t wish for anything that I couldn’t get and I got pretty near everything I wanted because I worked for it”. We’ll be visiting Mr. Armstrong’s great works again here at SDA LNR, as we have before; he is surely an artist to be celebrated.

Your Reader Tips are, as always, welcome in the comments.

87 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. Posted by: maz2 at June 12, 2008 12:22 PM
    Yes and they pulled the listing from the Georgia Guidestones. Talk talk talk while they are safely tucked in their gopher holes.

  2. I especially like the bon mot from Ambrose Bierce: “War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.”
    Martin Kramer, The Myth of Linkage
    By any objective reading, the reality should have been clear: the Middle East is not analogous to Europe, it has multiple sources of conflict, and even as one conflict moves to resolution, another may be inflamed. This is because the Middle East is not a single system of interlocking parts. It is made up of smaller systems and distinct pieces, that function independently of one another.
    The myth of “linkage” persists, then, because many observers cannot shed the analogy of the Middle East with Europe…

  3. I disagree in almost all aspects, with Martin Kramer’s ‘Myth of Linkage’.
    I completely agree with his rejection that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict LINKS to all other problems in the ME. As I’ve said frequently, most of the ME states don’t give, and never did give, a damn about Palestinians. Currently, Islamic fascism is using this conflict as a front for their own agenda. So, in my view, solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (and this task is primarily up to Israel)..won’t deal with the deeper problems in the ME.
    Kramer doesn’t ‘get it’. He considers that the problems with the other states in the ME, both Arab and Persian, are due to old STATE rivalries, and above all…here it comes..to the US need for hegemonic oil domination. Ahh, so that’s the problem.
    What’s missing? The real reason. Kramer never once mentions the term ‘tribalism’. I’d bet he doesn’t even know what it means. He probably thinks it means something like a group at a Canadian multicultural festival. It doesn’t.
    Tribalism is the basic operating infrastructure of the ME; it is a structure not an idea; it functions as a ‘map’ of correct and lawful interactions that you, the individual, must live your life within. You have no choice. It’s inflexible.
    This map determines the economic, political, legal, familial interactions of your life. And the map is hereditary; the interactions are based on blood, on kinship relations. It provides stability. It cannot provide any tactics of adaptation or functioning within the modern industrial world.
    This is the opposite of a civic model of a society, where interactions are open, flexible, and up to the individual.
    Tribalism is the real problem in the ME. Tribalism only functions within a medium size popuolation. It’s dysfunctional in a large population because it sets up the majority as without power in their own society. A modern industrial society requires a population that is intellectually flexible, spatially flexible, collaborative, interaction with others. All of this is heretical in a tribal structure.
    Kramer, with his simplistic idea of the ‘nation-state’ (which came after tribalism) and his simplistic America-bashing – doesn’t get it.

  4. http://tinyurl.com/4myhjl
    Maybe now all the hippies will finally get off this Global Warming bullcaca.
    First they came for big oil, and I was quiet
    Than they came for the redneck’s pickup trucks and I said nothing
    Than they came for the cannabis, OK now you’ve gone too far!

  5. Foreigners seem to be all over the ‘Roos this week:
    Graeme Wood, The Muftis of Cascadia
    After a complaint by the Canadian Islamic Congress, Maclean’s magazine and columnist Mark Steyn appeared before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal to defend the legality of their articles about Islam…
    What gives me hope for Canada is that the Canadian Islamic Congress appears to be aggrieved only in the most boring and uninspiring way. These people show no brilliance, nor even anti-brilliance. If they made a movie, it would probably resemble a cross between an after-school special and a particularly soporific hour of C-SPAN. In Pakistan, Rushdie’s supposed heresies aroused howling fury, and a mature, purposeful, and formidable challenge to Western ideals of free expression. By contrast, one of the complainants in Steyn’s case, Mohamed Elmasry, was apparently so unthrilled by his indignation that he did not bother to show up for the trial. The other, Naiyer Habib, was reduced to arguing that Steyn’s articles had, in essence, hurt his feelings by expressing contemptuous and hateful sentiments toward the Muslims of British Columbia. That’s it.

  6. Thanks, ET, I didn’t think you’d agree with Kramer. Don’t be surprised if Philip Carl Salzman offers a critique of The Myth of Linkage based on tribalism.

  7. No, I wouldn’t be surprised about Salzman and hope he does write a strong critique.
    Kramer’s thesis is invalid because it uses outmoded axioms and because it’s ignorant. It relies on a perspective that societies operate as nation-states and that the US has only one focus, oil.
    The nation-state is a post-tribal economic and political structure. Kramer obviously has no knowledge of pre-nation/state structures, such as the tribal. He doesn’t realize that setting up a population within a nation-state authority but having the political and economic powers run within tribal connections, sets up a society that is essentially imploding from within. The two modes don’t and can’t function together.
    The rise of Islamic fascism in the ME is the result of this conflict between an external structure of a nation-state and an internal structure of tribalism.
    Then, Kramer’s simplistic anti-Americanist claim that the US is ‘greedy for oil’ ignores that the ME states are ‘greedy to sell oil’. It further ignores that oil is, dangerously, their only economy and that they didn’t and can’t develop it because their Islamic ideology prevents the development of science and engineering. It ignores that all industrial states require oil.
    And, Kramer utterly ignores that this reliance on one economy, oil, developed without the participation of the citizen population, and with this oil controlled by tribal rather than by civic power ..sets up a population without any future in the political, economic and social nature of their country. Hence – Islamic fascism, which is an attempt to gain control.
    It’s a pathological attempt because fascism, which is a return to a past purity, won’t solve the problem. The only way to deal with the requirements of a large urban multimillion population in a modern global world, operating by industrialism – is a civic mode. Not tribal. You have to free the people from obligatory hereditary connections and enable flexible and collaborative interactions regardless of kinship.
    That’s what Bush’s policy of democratization is about. And he’s right in my view.
    And, you have to move out of an economy operating within only one product. Oil. You have to diversify. The UAE understands this. SA doesn’t.

  8. THE LIBERAL INSPIRED CBC were in dire straits (Noon Report-CBC-12:00 PM CST) to find fault in the PM’s apology to the Native population (Re”:Residential Schools.) One of the comments I heard from CBC is that “he didn’t sound sincere.” If he’s have wept openly, the CBC would have said that he’s a wimp. Be reminded that Stephen Harper was born in 1959. Bt the time he was 19 years of age, 99% of the residential school system had been eliminated. In any event, he did what Liberals could never accomplish. He brought it to an end!! (Hopefully.)

  9. Today is Referendum Day in Ireland …. the subject is ratification of the “Treaty” of Lisbon.
    The outcome decides whether or not Ireland will subject itself to rule of European bureaucrats as well as about 500million people in other parts of Europe where their governments refused to allow free votes on the matter.
    Irish the last chance for free men in Europe!
    Link Here!

  10. AP trots out Obama as victim article:
    -passing mention of Rev. Wright at middle of article
    -no mention of Rev Pfleger
    -no mention of Tony Reszko
    -no mention of Jim Johnson resignation in VP search committee
    ================
    The [website] is a response to the realities of a brave new world, where information travels 24 hours a day on blogs and voters are increasingly turning to the Internet for information. It’s a particular problem for Obama, a relative newcomer to national politics who is still unknown to many voters and has been the target of persistent misinformation campaigns online.
    http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2008/06/12/5855611-ap.html

  11. Left-wing Letterman on Bush and Cheney.
    =============
    My feeling about Cheney, and also Bush, but especially Cheney is that he just couldn’t care less about Americans. And the same is true of George Bush. And all they really want to do is somehow kiss up to the oil people so they can get some great annuity when they’re out of office. [audience applause] “There you go Dick [hand motion of distributing cash], nice job. There’s a couple of billion for your troubles.” I mean, he pretty much put Halliburton in business and the outsourcing of the military resources to private mercenary groups and so forth. Is there any humanity in either of these guys?
    http://tinyurl.com/3keqmv

  12. “Make Kelowna principles part of residential school healing: Martin” (cbc)
    …-
    Ex-PM Liberal P. Martin, Jr’s call goes out.
    Here is a call to the Parliament of Canada from Canadians.
    The Parliament of Canada is requested to arrange/convene an Ad$Cam Truth and Reconciliation Commission with the Liberal Party of Canada as the defendant.
    The Liberal Party through its current leader, Citoyen Dion, and its ex-leaders, J. Chretien and P. Martin, Jr., to issue an apology to Canadians for the theft by the Liberal Party of untold millions of Canadian taxpayers’ monies/taxes.
    The Liberal Party to repay forthwith to the public treasury the millions of dollars stolen from it.

  13. An apology for the theft of the Adscam Millions is the BIG ONE we’re all waiting on. It would be unwise to hold our breath. Liberals will never admit wrongdoing in this scam of scams,or anything else for that matter, they’re never wrong. The enabler, Jean Chretien, has already implied it was money well spent by saying “what’s a few million”?
    P. Diddly Poo Martin was asked by Harper to show up for this apology, damned decent of Harper,but, martin has been out of sight for many moons.
    Sick of the lot of the Liberals.Watching them scrambling and rummaging around to create scandals to tarnish the Conservatives is about all they have left.
    Stephen Harper showed the lot of them up with his delivery of the Apology to the Natives. It was simply a CLASS ACT BY A VERY FIRST RATE PRIME MINISTER.

  14. From Michael Geist’s blog concerning the DMCA introduced by Prentice today. Wonder what immigrants will think as their Region 2-4 DVDs are yanked out of the local rental shops…: “I’ll have more to say soon, but the takeaway is that the DMCA provisions are worse than the U.S. and the consumer exceptions riddled with limitations as the government promotes a strategy of locking down content and launching lawsuits against Internet users.”
    http://tinyurl.com/6q84ua
    Worse – educational exemptions are two-faced, and librarians are now an enforcement mechanism
    http://tinyurl.com/5994l4
    Pro-consumer? Balanced? Read the fine print. Think for yourself.

  15. they did win the turf war, as soon as oil got to 10$ a bbl ottawa didnt want it . as so many houses had gone into foreclosure , the province and the municipalities got plenty of “turf” back.
    “it hisnt hezzy beaning green” Borat Dion.

  16. [quote]Left-wing Letterman on Bush and Cheney.[/quote]
    OttRob,
    I sure the hell am not a Left-Wing wing nut… but these Statements by The Saudi Arabian Oil Minister has serious implictions.
    National Post; June 10th, FP-18, Energy
    “The Increase in prices isn’t justified in terms of market fundementals.”
    Saudi Arabia, the worlds biggest oil exporter, said it increased output this month and has told
    all the oil companies it deals with that it’s ready to provide them with additional supplies if needed.
    Say What! OPEC & Big Oil have secret agreements RE: Supply. A clear Violation of US law: Sherman Anti-Trust.. “Bag the Big Oil Bastards”
    The Corrupt Republicans on one side and Corrupt Democrats on the other. The green Commies sucking from both sides
    Oil Price = Fruad
    Global Warming = Fraud
    George W. Bush IS.. what he IS.. History may not be Kind.
    McCain better dig deep.. incoming..

  17. This is from TORedStar: Notice how TO says “Canada may profit”.
    …-
    “Canada may profit from food price surge”
    “Canadian farmers and food processors stand to profit from the current surge in global food prices.”
    “says the study called “Food Prices: A boon for producers, a buffer for consumers.””
    http://tinyurl.com/5uy3qj
    …-
    More from TORedStar: Now TO says “Ontario”.
    “Japanese automakers thriving in Ontario”
    Expert perfesser say, “”They’re non-unionized, they’ve got a younger workforce and they pay less,””
    Meanwhile at CAW’s unionized sweatshops: GM pays more.
    “Unionized workers staged angry protests after GM announced last week it planned to stop production at a truck plant in Oshawa, that employs 2,600 people because, the company said, people just weren’t buying the pick-up trucks produced there.”
    http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/442401
    (cawcawcawbuzzzzz)

  18. Vitruvius: “I think that Mr. Harper
    may be playing a deeper game than some think.”
    I agree, Vitruvius. If not, I’ll be a very disillusioned supporter of the CPC and PMSH.
    ‘LOVE Louis Armstrong, who lived in a very modest house in Brooklyn–I think it was?–all his adult life, with his one wife, Lucille. He could have afforded a mansion anywhere. He knew all of his neighbours. What a guy!
    True bliss, for me at least, is Louis AND Ella; ‘have two of their collaberations, which always lifts my spirits if they’re drooping. You can’t get much better than the two of them, alone, let alone TOGETHER.

  19. Do not download Mo & Al. It’s verboten by “Hector”.
    …-
    Mohammed, PBUH, TM
    By Ezra Levant on June 12, 2008 1:23 PM |
    I think another lawsuit is coming my way.
    Today, my lawyer received this letter from a radical Muslim activist in Toronto. It’s a Certificate of Registration of Copyright. He claims to have copyrighted the image of Mohammed, PBUH. In other words, it’s now Mohammed, PBUH, TM.
    I checked it out on Industry Canada’s copyright database and, sure enough, there it is: two weeks ago, Akhtar “Hector” Agha has indeed registered a “Restriction on Depiction of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)”. It’s right there on the government website.
    I’m not sure, but I think “Hector” might be looking for a royalties payment for whenever I do something like post this picture.”
    http://ezralevant.com/

  20. Yeah, Harper is playing a game alright. DrDawg said it best in his blog:
    A very well-scripted apology it was, delivered by the fellow whose government…
    *tore up the Kelowna Accord, ignored Parliament’s vote to reinstate it, and offered aboriginal people a fraction of what the deal called for;
    *refused fast-track payments to the very people to whom he has now apologized;
    *continues the Liberal malign neglect of the Lubicon Cree;
    *keeps Maurice Vellacott in his caucus–the Conservative MP who defended the Saskatoon cops that took Darrell Night out for a “starlight tour,” like the one that killed Neil Stonechild;
    *to our international shame, voted against the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and indeed made every effort to scuttle it.
    But how timely this apology is! Why, one of these days there might actually be an election: Operation Outreach continues. And in this glaringly obvious context, what a disgraceful example of form without substance that apology was. What empty words. What hollow rhetoric.

  21. Yeah, rove, and the Librano$ honoured their written-on-a-napkin “Kelowna Accord (sic)”?
    They had time to.
    They couldv’e.
    They didn’t.

  22. But rove, you haven’t outlined why those items that you support, SHOULD be supported.
    The Lubicon is a mess, with several tribes involved, including some who don’t even live in the land base. It’s isn’t as black and white as poptart articles imply. Oh, and by the way, this has been an issue for ALL the years of the Liberal regime. Well?
    Fast-tracking payments? First, the infrastructure of the band has to be dealt with, so that the few leaders don’t take it all. Changing the band infrastructure from a commonality to individualism isn’t easy but the way it is now, permits enormous corruption.
    Why should we sign anything from that most corrupt institution on earth, the UN?
    What’s so great about the Kelowna Accord? Did you know that Paul Martin never had it signed? Did you know that it referred to money, which Martin promised, but which he did NOT budget for? Got that? Did you know that it was pure empty rhetoric, nothing but money promises, with no infrastructural outline? What’s needed is a complete restructuring of the reserve and band system – and that’s not about to happen with Kelowna which just retains it.

  23. The error that people, such as WK, Dawg, BCL and other leftists, who promote Section 13 of the HRC, are making is in the definition of ‘ hated speech’.
    We already have, in Canada, Sections 318 and 319 of the criminal code, that deal with hate speech. Section 318 refers to ‘advocating genocide’, which is, in a public space, ‘supporting or arguing for the killing of members of an identifiable group’.
    Now wait a minute. Isn’t that exactly what Elmasry, who brought the case against Steyn and Macleans..isn’t that exactly what he advocated when he publicly preached that all Israelis over the age of 18 were legitimate targets to be killed? And our legal system did nothing?
    Then, there’s Section 319, which refers to, in a public space, inciting hatred against an identifiable group in such a way that there will likely be a breach of peace.’ Like marching along screaming ‘death to infidels’.
    Now, our totalitarian rule, Section 13 of the HRAct, defines hate speech as anything ‘likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt because they are identified’..as a member of a particular group’.
    Notice the difference. The criminal code requires actuality. That is, it requires that the individual actually advocate killing (318) or, incites killing (319).
    But section 13 doesn’t refer to any action, to any acts of violence whatsoever. It refers only to FEELINGS. And feelings are totally subjective and personal. And, furthermore, Section 13 doesn’t require any such feelings to have been felt. Got that? NOBODY need feel ‘hated’ or ‘viewed with contempt’ for a violation to occur.
    Indeed, in the most recent travesty, the Boissoin case, no-one felt hated or viewed with contempt. Instead, an activist filed the complaint. He wasn’t even a member of the specific ‘group’.
    And, another point, this emotion that we are dealing with, not only need not happen, but, the decision-making takes place without any actual requirement for it to happen. The wording is ‘likely to result in’. Not DID actually result in. But’likely’. Who decides whether the future will happen? Even Tarot cards, tea leaves and spinning the dice don’t have such abilities.
    But, our esteemed HR commissioners claim that they do. And so do the leftists, such as WK, dawg, bcl. They all claim that there must be ‘limits on free speech’.
    But, who defines the limits? How? What they want is a top-down system, where govt decides the limits. That’s our current kangaroo courts, where a bunch of ignorant appointees make these decisions. We see the results. Disastrous.
    That’s not how ideas ought to be dealt with – by a top down governance that sets rules about what you may think and talk about. That’s totalitarianism. That’s Plato’s philosopher kings who rule over us – because we are told that we don’t have the capacity of reason.
    What WK, dawg, bcl are doing, is denying that each and everyone of us has the capacity and right to think. We’ll decide, ourselves, who’s the fool and who’s the sage. Not you self-styled philosopher-kings. Not the govt. We will. How?
    We’ll debate your talk; we’ll question you; we’ll reject you; we’ll laugh at you; we’ll sneer at you; and we’ll accept you. We’ll do it, because enough of us peasants can think and reason – and no govt needs to step in and stop us from doing so. It’s this basic human capacity to think and reason that is so rejected by these totalitarian kings, such as wk, dawg and others.

  24. OK, they got the apology, and deserved one. What went on in those schools was despicable. The winners of the Residential School Lottery will get their pound of flesh. BUT..Where’s the corresponding THANK-YOU for, Electricity, agriculture, roads, telephones, guns for shooting fishermen, mining, forestry, houses to destroy, welfare cheques, free education, doctors, dentists, cars, central heat, natural gas, running water, television……….none of which they would have had without the europeans. Never a Thank-you, just a hand out for MORE.

  25. That UN resolution that was not signed by the conservatives was also rejected by the precious gov’t,remember them ,the party whose name cannot be spelled without the letters L I E . They also recognized that the resolution would give the natives claim to the entire country. This apology by Harper may help some people close an ugly chapter in their lives,I hope so.Unfortunately there are some that will see it as a green light to extort more from the taxpayers to reinforce their victim status. ET,I wish you were my neighbour.

  26. ET and babt:
    Isn’t it time to find a better comeback than “but, but, the Liberals”?

  27. rove, we aren’t setting up a ‘but, but the Liberals’. We are asking that you justify your criticism by explaining why what you support, OUGHT to be supported.
    So far, you haven’t done this; you’ve just tried to deflect your lack of explanation by diverting to a counter claim that we are anti-Liberal Party.
    So, tell us what’s so great about those items that you support and why we should support them.

  28. Mr Dithers , former PMPM , Paul Martin shows up again, he hasnt sat in the commons for 6 months. and hasnt legitamately collected a MP cheque for a year and the MSM calls him newsworthy.
    CBCpravda and the lot are having trouble finding a hole in PMSHs apology, next it will be his eyes were too Aryan to properly project a French attitude to residential schools, when everyone knows they , the Quebequois , started the whole thing.

  29. re: PM S. Harper’s deeper game
    i was surprised by comments posted the other day referring to a conservative government statement as treacherous – the statement about being at arm’s length from the operation of the hrc. i’m sure the comments were a misunderstanding of the pace that parliament moves at – never mind a parliament run by a minority government. the official pace is listed as “slower than molasses going uphill in january.”
    no need for disappointment – this issue is probably one in a thousand currently facing the government (though for the life of me i cannot think of anything more important). nowhere in that statement did i see an endorsement of the human rights act section 13(1) – instead what i saw was a typical bland assertion that the government knows exactly what the status quo is and for the time being nobody is going to get fired. for the time being. the conservatives will fix this problem when they get their hands on the big stick – ie a majority government – and that is coming as sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
    i am passionately opposed to the bad law but not
    impatient – my wasting emotional energy because i witness all the injustice will get this issue nowhere for anyone. instead i bend every person’s ear i get the chance to. and write.
    write to the mp’s in ottawa that have taken action – you can find their e-mail addresses over at ezra’s:
    http://ezralevant.com/2008/05/government-to-launch-inquiry-i.html
    send a thank you and word of encouragement. Ottawa’s free speech hero – Dr. Keith Martin MP (juan de fuca – esquimalt) might not be on that page but a link to all MP’s e-mail can be found there.
    remember what Canada’s current Prime Minister said back in 1999 (B.C. Report Newsmagazine):
    “Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack o­n our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff.”
    don’tcha just love free speech? and for kate thankyou too! – you can expect some notes with pictures of former prime ministers on them.

  30. Lone Ranger: “One of the comments I heard from CBC is that “he didn’t sound sincere.” — Oh my gosh. Who said that? That’s outrageous!

  31. Maz2, your Post at 4:25 PM,
    Was curiously interesting.
    ** Here is a call to the Parliament of Canada from Canadians.
    The Parliament of Canada is requested to arrange/convene an Ad$Cam Truth and Reconciliation Commission with the Liberal Party of Canada as the defendant.**
    Almost sounds like April 1st.
    Is this humour, or was it (CBC) radio? TV?
    I*ve often said clever PR moves along reconciliation lines could give die-hard Liberals the thread they need to get behind the party again.
    Not Dion thinking certainly.
    If it was CBC Radio, I know there may be no link till the following day.
    Looking to learn more about this. = TG

  32. Woah! Found it on Google.
    Those crafty Liberals. I had no idea they would actually make the move towards redemtion as outlined a month ago on CalgaryGrit.
    First issue a carefully worded general apology for sloppy appropriation of funds and then outline several ethics moves to ensure strict tax dollar accountability with audits for all government departments, not just general audit as at present.
    Canadian voters could never fall for it or would they? = TG

  33. rove, give it up.
    If anyone is but, but…it’s you:
    “But, but, the CPC government and PMSH [whiney voice intact] didn’t honour the Kelowna Accord (sic) or sign the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, what empty words, what hollow rhetoric…yada, yada, yada.”
    Like ET says, support your reasons for suggesting that the CPC should have done anything about a completely phoney, photo-op, signature-less “Accord,” or why Canada is in any way obligated to sign a document put forward by the totally discredited and corrupt UN.
    The ball’s in your court, rove.

Navigation