At 9:17pm ET / 6:17pm PT, Tucker Carlson will interview Kyle Rittenhouse:
27 Replies to “Kyle Rittenhouse, in his first TV Inteview”
Hmmm…they sort of teased that the first set of attorneys Rittenhouse had were charlatans. I hope they give names. I’d like to do a deep dive in Lexis and see what kind of circles they run in. The implication is that they searched him out.
They did. Lin Wood was one.
Lin Wood revealed himself for what he truly is. I sincerely hope PDJT has made the necessary adjustments to his Guest Lists. Because I have.
And let me be brutally honest … if Trump doesn’t ditch Lin Wood completely … then I’ll ditch Trump. I’m not joking. Using Kyle Rittenhouse … for ANY purpose other than obtaining a NOT GUILTY verdict is immoral in the highest degree … and don’t give me no “moral relativity”
You’re very wrong on Lin Wood. Why did you conclude this? He’s a man of integrity, but he had a lot of deep state enemies, and they are doing a good job of smearing him.
I follow Wood on Telegrsm, every day. And he is strongly supported by a lot of other people of integrity (who consider him a friend). Mike Lindell is one. Prof. David Clements is another.
Nonsense.
1. He has FAILED utterly to deliver one scintilla of evidence PROVING the election was stolen from Trump. Despite yapping incessantly about how he would.
2. He USED Kyle Rittenhouse’s LIFE to fundraise and hackle-raise conservative “outrage”.
Wood is an unethical bag of wind. No strike 3 needed. Trump better wise up. Or I’ll be voting for anybody BUT.
Kyle Rittenhouse is part of the Deep State now? Innnnteresting!!
Kenji there was more than enough evidence delivered regarding the electoral fraud. The fact that courts are corrupt is beyond anything I have seen outside of communist dictatorships.
MVOWG … without a doubt, the courts are corrupt. But all I wanted and waited to hear from Lin Wood was CONCRETE evidence. Evidence that cannot be refuted. The kind of evidence a super-lawyer delivers that changes a Jury’s mind. Makes it impossible and untenable to deny it.
I’m still waiting for that promise from Lin Wood. He didn’t lay out the case he promised.
He’s no different from the Kenosha Prosecutor promising to prove that Rittenhouse was an … “active shooter”. The evidence proved the opposite.
You know my beliefs … but Lin Wood and Sidney Powell promised MUCH, but delivered nothing (substantial). Sorry. At best, the two of them became enamored with hearing their own voices, and seeing themselves on TV.
That young man, Kyle, is incredibly well spoken and astonishingly polite given what he has been thru. A tribute to his upbringing by some wonderful parental figures.
A man with a very bright future should he keep his composure and continue to grow in wisdom and integrity.
And let me add that at the start Tucker pointed out that Kyle is as far from “privilege” as one can get. A kid raised in a divorced home to lower middle class white trash (sorry, I don’t think his mother is Chairman of her local “Juniors Club”). That doesn’t mean I don’t like her as a person … but these are as “commoners” as “commoners” gets.
Isn’t it funny how the Leftists get all worked up speaking of their “lack of privilege” … but never recognize anyone else’s lack of privilege. Yes. The Left loves to create caste systems. Lots of em. So many that you are surely to be EXCLUDED from ALL of their identity-castes
The kid is a hero, he made two Antifa good and improved a third one.
He says he supports BLM. WTF?
He is a kid not a politician or an analyst. He was referring to a sugar coated version of what BLM allegedly stands for (i.e. equal treatment of all people), and he supports the same ideals. The fact that BLM is a Marxist, black supremacist movement is a topic for another debate and there is no need for a 17 year old to engage in it. Besides, his actions speak louder than words.
He supports people’s right to speak freely and peaceably protest.
This is a good strategy, though. He was in Kenosha to assist people who were in need of medical attention, and to help protect his community. He really does support free speech and peaceful protests. If BLM criticizes him, they look like they publicly reject peaceful protest and free speech and alienate moderates. If they accept his support, they alienate their base. He has them in a fork that can only help him and hurt them.
Funny thing … EVERY other thing the kid believes in aligns perfectly with solid conservatism. Hell … I voted for Jimmy Carter. We are all young and dumb once.
Seems like a nice young man. I only disagreed with one thing, one word actually. It is not a “privilege” to have the right to self defense. Giving him a break, I think he just chose the wrong word. But it’s an important distinction that should have been corrected by TC. We know who the truly privileged were in those streets that night.
“A privilege is a certain entitlement to immunity granted by the state or another authority to a restricted group, either by birth or on a conditional basis. … By contrast, a right is an inherent, irrevocable entitlement held by all citizens or all human beings from the moment of birth.”
The defense lawyers used that word, so it is a good word. Yes “Right” is better, but in lawyer speak privilege is a choice.
However I would abstain from using it because of the connotation or connection to thoughts of white privilege.
That may explain Kyle’s use of it but, in that context, it is the wrong word. There is a huge difference between a privilege and a right. Attempting to define self defense as a privilege is part of the attack on the 2nd amendment.
One only has to juxtapose this well-spoken, likable young man with Kamala Harris to recognize how genuinely fucked up the United States is.
I was glad that Kyle dropped Naples FL as the place he may choose for his next residence. I’m hoping it will stop the influx of rich socialists moving here if they think we’re a town full of gun-slinging white supremacists.
I was thrilled to hear him say that – we are heading there as snowbirds this Winter!
Oh wow…if what he said is true, Wood and Pierce need to be addressed. First, they had Rittenhouse do an interview with the Washington Post (never a good idea)…but then they had raised enough money for bail by mid September. But Pierce and Wood didn’t pay the bail with the money. Instead, they kept Rittenhouse in jail until the end of November so they could raise more money for their own benefit.
I had my comments deleted from the National Post, after the verdict of ”not guilty” had been made public all over the world. I merely suggested that the trial was over, the jury had spoken, and we should respect that. It makes you wonder who’s side some of the so called ”right wing” media in really on.
I would not say that the National Post is conservative or “right wing”
A frank interview.
It must be shown everywhere.
Many people do not know the history of government police. The public agreed to allow the government to set up police forces and along with that agreement was that if situations arise where the police cannot stop a crime, the public can do so in their absence. And so, self defence (especially in this case) is rock solid.
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media and politicians deliberately lying about facts in cases like this.
The media’s message?
Let this be a lesson to everyone should you decide to break free from “approved” conduct in the new world order
Hmmm…they sort of teased that the first set of attorneys Rittenhouse had were charlatans. I hope they give names. I’d like to do a deep dive in Lexis and see what kind of circles they run in. The implication is that they searched him out.
They did. Lin Wood was one.
Lin Wood revealed himself for what he truly is. I sincerely hope PDJT has made the necessary adjustments to his Guest Lists. Because I have.
And let me be brutally honest … if Trump doesn’t ditch Lin Wood completely … then I’ll ditch Trump. I’m not joking. Using Kyle Rittenhouse … for ANY purpose other than obtaining a NOT GUILTY verdict is immoral in the highest degree … and don’t give me no “moral relativity”
You’re very wrong on Lin Wood. Why did you conclude this? He’s a man of integrity, but he had a lot of deep state enemies, and they are doing a good job of smearing him.
I follow Wood on Telegrsm, every day. And he is strongly supported by a lot of other people of integrity (who consider him a friend). Mike Lindell is one. Prof. David Clements is another.
Nonsense.
1. He has FAILED utterly to deliver one scintilla of evidence PROVING the election was stolen from Trump. Despite yapping incessantly about how he would.
2. He USED Kyle Rittenhouse’s LIFE to fundraise and hackle-raise conservative “outrage”.
Wood is an unethical bag of wind. No strike 3 needed. Trump better wise up. Or I’ll be voting for anybody BUT.
Kyle Rittenhouse is part of the Deep State now? Innnnteresting!!
Kenji there was more than enough evidence delivered regarding the electoral fraud. The fact that courts are corrupt is beyond anything I have seen outside of communist dictatorships.
MVOWG … without a doubt, the courts are corrupt. But all I wanted and waited to hear from Lin Wood was CONCRETE evidence. Evidence that cannot be refuted. The kind of evidence a super-lawyer delivers that changes a Jury’s mind. Makes it impossible and untenable to deny it.
I’m still waiting for that promise from Lin Wood. He didn’t lay out the case he promised.
He’s no different from the Kenosha Prosecutor promising to prove that Rittenhouse was an … “active shooter”. The evidence proved the opposite.
You know my beliefs … but Lin Wood and Sidney Powell promised MUCH, but delivered nothing (substantial). Sorry. At best, the two of them became enamored with hearing their own voices, and seeing themselves on TV.
That young man, Kyle, is incredibly well spoken and astonishingly polite given what he has been thru. A tribute to his upbringing by some wonderful parental figures.
A man with a very bright future should he keep his composure and continue to grow in wisdom and integrity.
And let me add that at the start Tucker pointed out that Kyle is as far from “privilege” as one can get. A kid raised in a divorced home to lower middle class white trash (sorry, I don’t think his mother is Chairman of her local “Juniors Club”). That doesn’t mean I don’t like her as a person … but these are as “commoners” as “commoners” gets.
Isn’t it funny how the Leftists get all worked up speaking of their “lack of privilege” … but never recognize anyone else’s lack of privilege. Yes. The Left loves to create caste systems. Lots of em. So many that you are surely to be EXCLUDED from ALL of their identity-castes
The kid is a hero, he made two Antifa good and improved a third one.
He says he supports BLM. WTF?
He is a kid not a politician or an analyst. He was referring to a sugar coated version of what BLM allegedly stands for (i.e. equal treatment of all people), and he supports the same ideals. The fact that BLM is a Marxist, black supremacist movement is a topic for another debate and there is no need for a 17 year old to engage in it. Besides, his actions speak louder than words.
He supports people’s right to speak freely and peaceably protest.
This is a good strategy, though. He was in Kenosha to assist people who were in need of medical attention, and to help protect his community. He really does support free speech and peaceful protests. If BLM criticizes him, they look like they publicly reject peaceful protest and free speech and alienate moderates. If they accept his support, they alienate their base. He has them in a fork that can only help him and hurt them.
Funny thing … EVERY other thing the kid believes in aligns perfectly with solid conservatism. Hell … I voted for Jimmy Carter. We are all young and dumb once.
Seems like a nice young man. I only disagreed with one thing, one word actually. It is not a “privilege” to have the right to self defense. Giving him a break, I think he just chose the wrong word. But it’s an important distinction that should have been corrected by TC. We know who the truly privileged were in those streets that night.
“A privilege is a certain entitlement to immunity granted by the state or another authority to a restricted group, either by birth or on a conditional basis. … By contrast, a right is an inherent, irrevocable entitlement held by all citizens or all human beings from the moment of birth.”
The defense lawyers used that word, so it is a good word. Yes “Right” is better, but in lawyer speak privilege is a choice.
However I would abstain from using it because of the connotation or connection to thoughts of white privilege.
That may explain Kyle’s use of it but, in that context, it is the wrong word. There is a huge difference between a privilege and a right. Attempting to define self defense as a privilege is part of the attack on the 2nd amendment.
One only has to juxtapose this well-spoken, likable young man with Kamala Harris to recognize how genuinely fucked up the United States is.
I was glad that Kyle dropped Naples FL as the place he may choose for his next residence. I’m hoping it will stop the influx of rich socialists moving here if they think we’re a town full of gun-slinging white supremacists.
I was thrilled to hear him say that – we are heading there as snowbirds this Winter!
Oh wow…if what he said is true, Wood and Pierce need to be addressed. First, they had Rittenhouse do an interview with the Washington Post (never a good idea)…but then they had raised enough money for bail by mid September. But Pierce and Wood didn’t pay the bail with the money. Instead, they kept Rittenhouse in jail until the end of November so they could raise more money for their own benefit.
I had my comments deleted from the National Post, after the verdict of ”not guilty” had been made public all over the world. I merely suggested that the trial was over, the jury had spoken, and we should respect that. It makes you wonder who’s side some of the so called ”right wing” media in really on.
I would not say that the National Post is conservative or “right wing”
A frank interview.
It must be shown everywhere.
Many people do not know the history of government police. The public agreed to allow the government to set up police forces and along with that agreement was that if situations arise where the police cannot stop a crime, the public can do so in their absence. And so, self defence (especially in this case) is rock solid.
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media and politicians deliberately lying about facts in cases like this.
The media’s message?
Let this be a lesson to everyone should you decide to break free from “approved” conduct in the new world order