She may barely be competent but Hillary would be “the perfect US president,” says Guardian columnist. Because the “symbolic power” of her genitals “transcends all else.”
She may barely be competent but Hillary would be “the perfect US president,” says Guardian columnist. Because the “symbolic power” of her genitals “transcends all else.”
We women are certainly unlucky in our leftist role models: Hillary, Pauline Marois, Kathleen Wynne, Elizabeth May, Nancy Pelosi. They remind me of Soviet era female apparatchiki.
Yes, she has Presidential genitals, she has Bill.
Either the Brit Fabian media has jumped the shark or they have lost their sense of socratic irony
Nicola – yes, but on the other side Lady Thatcher, Golda Meyer, and Queens Elizabeth II and Victoria have so heavily weighed the scale towards competency that some droolers on the left don’t define women in politics.
Hill with a strap -on for Bill
The mind boggles
Should come up with my own but this one is good:
‘Ms. Orr’s other mistake is not appreciating the true symbolism of a Hillary victory. Specifically, that the only way for a woman to get ahead is to marry well and remain mute during her husband’s numerous marital infidelities, while bystanders laugh at her’
How well did symbolic voting work out in 2008 and 2012??
Don’t make the same mistake a third time America!
Why not, we had someone elected for the color of his skin, so next someone elected for his lack of balls … oh, wait.
Wow…President Mudflap! Who knew!
Years ago I flipped on the TV to catch the noon news. Jean had just been appointed GG and the little CTV was beside himself with joy. He rubbed his wee hands with glee and gushed, “Yes, and she has all the right qualities – she’s female, bilingual, and a visible minority”.
Exactly, but it is noticeable by some in our society that there is no emergence or acceptance of capable good leaders like these in recent history, but rather, to use Nicola’s analogy, Soviet style female apparatchiks are being pushed to the fore by the political parties and media.
Liz J, you got that right.
*
strange… the “symbolic power” of her genitals lost out to gennifer flowers and monica lewinsky… to name but a few of slick willie’s bimbettes.
she’s a feminist in the same way that justin trudeau is an intellectual.
*
Is that the symbolic power of her genitals, or is she just happy to see me?
You guys notice it’s not Clinton for President, it’s Hillary for President?
This bench has more skeletons in her closet than Imelda Marcos. The DemocRats are crooked, not stupid. They’ll let her burn money, then slide another ringer in under her at the convention, just like Barry in 2008.
Doesn’t really matter anyway, the course is not set from the White House so much as the vast weight of the bureaucracy grinding forward, unable to slow or turn.
This is going to be like that home schooling thing. Nothing will happen, and then EVERYTHING will happen. Mass resignations from the military, food riots, cops deserting their posts, the usual.
Just have a read of what went on in the 1930’s, it’ll be like that. Except with better TV coverage.
To be fair Hillary likely has more balls than Obama and likely would have done better as well, but I think the US has had enough of electing people for their race/gender. Both parties need to let go their dynasties and bring in fresh competent blood.