The true insanity is not that there are crazy people in this world — there always are (I can tell some stories after 45 years in church) — but that modern feminism actually strives to elevate the crazy, the stupid, and the just plain hysterical into the realm of actually relevant cultural and political commentary.
Appropriate word “hysterical” when used in this context.
The internet has pierced the heavily controlled “information” bubble that progressives have used to abuse us and push their agenda for decades.
There is plenty of shrieking going on because reality completely destroys the ideologically constructed world they live in.
Facts and those who push them MUST be shouted down, shut up, or destroyed, otherwise their whole world collapses – along with their ability to control us.
Never, ever, vote for a reality challenged progressive.
The problem with feminism is that they’ve already won.
Women are equal before the law, they make the same money men do, they are excluded from nothing, they are in fact forcibly included in places it isn’t strictly sensible for them to be. They can sleep with whoever they want whenever they want and have no negative social stigma attach to them because of it, they can marry or not without consequence, they can pretty much do whatever the h3ll they want, more so even than men.
They. Won.
Therefore, the modern “feminist” now has to actively manufacture things to be outraged over. Like Matt Taylor’s shirt during the comet landing.
http://phantomsoapbox.blogspot.ca/2014/11/the-woman-who-made-mankinds-first-comet.html
Completely fabricated. Utterly baseless canard leveled against the man, and he can’t even defend himself because its a mobbing on the internet. There’s not even anybody to punch in the face.
The words “reality challenged” are redundant.
Female solipsism prevents the fairer sex from adequately grasping the principles of justice and fairness…
http://www.returnofkings.com/48747/why-the-world-would-not-be-a-better-place-if-women-ruled
*.*
“One of feminism’s irritating reflexes is its fashionable disdain for “patriarchal society,” to which nothing good is ever attributed. But it is patriarchal society that has freed me as a woman. It is capitalism that has given me the leisure to sit at this desk writing this book. Let us stop being small-minded about men… If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts.”
– Camille Paglia, lesbian feminist, in Sexual Personae
http://www.returnofkings.com/27852/why-patriarchy-is-the-greatest-social-system-ever-created
I gotta get me one of those shirts…
French’s article is spot-on. I have one small semantic quibble: regarding the woman who (she claims) “can’t even listen to a mildly controversial speech without having to walk out to keep from either blacking out or throwing up”, French writes —
No one should believe for a second that the woman is emotionally fragile. A successful, outspoken woman who claims — exclaims – that the act of merely hearing an expression of fact or opinion that she deems ideologically out of bounds will make her either throw up or *black out* is neither sensitive nor emotionally frail, but is rather someone has made a calling of manipulation and emotional blackmail whenever she has no legitimate counterargument.
Similarly, her putative “hypersensitivity” is actually just the monkey-brain imperative of a would-be fascist. Just as no one would describe a Taliban thug as being hypersensitive to the sight of girls carrying books, no would should mistake the outrageous emotional demands of a hard-core, entitled, self-serving, self-indoctrinated brat as evidence of delicacy of feeling.
French himself nails it later in his piece when he identifies current-day so-called feminism as “mostly just a series of temper tantrums thrown by a small, privileged minority.”
That’s just it. When a self-serving ideology marshals together the privileged, emotionally incontinent social byproducts of ‘special snowflake’ syndrome and provides them with an ideological justification for their irrationality and lack of consideration for people who don’t perfectly mirror their own inner brats, you’re going to see a nationwide tantrum.
Why aren’t they outraged by the treatment of women in the muslim world?
Femnazi’s false rape accusation blows up in her face.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2014/12/10/barry-one-tolena-dunham-why-didnt-you-clear-my-name
I want to thank Lena Dunham for confirming that the “Barry” described in her book is a pseudonym. As the sole source of the events in that book, her confirmation was crucial. I am relieved to have my name cleared as best as it can at this point.
The last nine weeks, spent both wrongfully accused and ignored, were frightening for me and my family. It was also baffling. As days turned to weeks, and weeks into months, Random House and Ms. Dunham’s silence became unfathomable. It’s frustrating and ironic to me that Ms. Dunham’s recent admission that it was all an “unfortunate and surreal coincidence” echoes my earlier comment to a reporter printed over six weeks ago.
It also begs the questions, why didn’t you clear my name? Why did you wait? Why did I have to set up a legal fund and threaten to sue in order for action to be taken?
Surely, had my concerns not been ignored when I quietly and privately brought them to your representatives in October, your story would have remained focused on its true intentions, which I believe are very noble. Unfortunately, because of the delay, my reputation has sustained irreparable harm.
I hope this case serves as a reminder to writers, publishers, and others with a stake in narrative that they must take special care when releasing non-fiction works featuring criminal acts. Copyright page disclaimers simply aren’t enough. Fact checking must be rigorous, unintended consequences of altered details must be researched, and the use of pseudonyms must be consistent and clear. Importantly, this goes beyond a simple coincidence of a relatively rare name, as has been suggested. I was an outspoken Republican at Oberlin College; I already stuck out like a sore thumb. When such obvious parallels are missed, corrective and restorative action should be taken immediately.
I want to be very clear: I have absolutely no reason to doubt Ms. Dunham’s claim that she was sexually assaulted in college. I hope, too, that her story brings courage and strength to other survivors of sexual assaults. I also hope that my story will serve as an example to those who are falsely accused or incorrectly placed under suspicion of serious sexual misconduct allegations that the truth will eventually come out.
“Why aren’t they outraged by the treatment of women in the muslim world?”
There’s no MONEY in being outraged at Mooselimbs right now. There’s only money in being outraged at De White Man. Academics gots ta eat, y’know.
Besides, De White Man ain’t going to cut your head off for disrespecting. Mooselimbs are known to do that kinda thing.
“When a self-serving ideology marshals together the privileged, emotionally incontinent social byproducts of ‘special snowflake’ syndrome and provides them with an ideological justification for their irrationality and lack of consideration for people who don’t perfectly mirror their own inner brats, you’re going to see a nationwide tantrum.”
What you said.
The supreme ego gratification can never be enough for them. They need more.
These overfed ewes cannot see above the rim of the trough at which they feed.
Cave women must have been pretty rugged after all being hit over the head witha club and dragged along on the back was pretty tough way of life and primative mating habits We Spurwing Plover end up getting intoa squable amounst ourselves