Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
This isn’t a surprise. For anyone following the technical discussions at WUWT and Climate Audit, raw data adjustment has been a serious issue for at least 10 years. Because the various institutes like Goddard and NOAA refused to disclose for years their methodology and documentation for the data adjustments, years were spent trying to figure out how much was real and how much warming was cooked into the numbers.
The scale of the adjustments are so large that the entire claimed temperature rise may in fact simply be an artifact of changed numbers.
Exactly!
One commenter on Steven’s site, kirkmyers, sums it up very well by saying, “Our economic and political freedoms are under attack. We are waging a life-and-death battle against an axis of radical Luddites, unethical grant-seeking scientists, and corporate and political power brokers who want to shut down our modern industrial economy, saddle us with confiscatory energy taxes, and enact a draconian system of bureaucratic controls that will turn daily life into a living hell.”
Just so, Ken. Ever since the publication of Amory Lovins’ Soft Energy Path in 1976, it’s been a solution wandering around looking for a problem to solve. Global warming was designed with this in mind. Which is why the warmers are so opposed to the obvious solution to their apparent problem, nuclear power. The soft energy path was overtly antinuclear as written.
Small scale Thorium nuclear and hydroelectric are the best energy options we’ve got.
Unfortunately the efforts of the anti-everything environmental fringe and the perceived entitlements of the first-residents have made more hydro development unrealistically expensive. The well intentioned efforts of the environmentalists have made LNG the best short term option. If they don’t like it, then they’ve got nobody to blame but themselves.
According to Readers Digest, if global warming continues, in 20 years the only chance we’ll have to see a polar bear is in a zoo. So in other words, nothing is going to change.