IPCC’s SH temperature reconstructions in their signature spaghetti graph (Figure 5.7b) used California bristlecone chronologies, upside down Tiljander and European instrumental temperature data, but did not use Antarctic isotope data.
IPCC’s SH temperature reconstructions in their signature spaghetti graph (Figure 5.7b) used California bristlecone chronologies, upside down Tiljander and European instrumental temperature data, but did not use Antarctic isotope data.
Of corse, an IPCC expert is one who states, that when reality(data) diverges from the model, reality must be wrong.
Not “pee”er reviewed?
I’m shocked I tell you! Shocked.
. . . because nobody lies, cheats, scams & schemes like the climate science community, egged on by the multi billion dollar eco greenie industry.
Liars.
Cheaters
Scammers.
Can’t wait for Dr. Fruit Fly to do a special show on this topic, on the corruption of science and the negative influence on public policy.
C’mon CBC . . . for once tell Canadians the truth.
The climate fear industry seems to rely on the principle that if you make the pseudoscience bad enough, no one will believe you when you point out how bad it actually is. It’s akin to the problems faced by the first people who’d escaped the Soviet Gulags, or the first to tell about the Cambodian killing fields. No one would believe them if they told the truth. They had to moderate their descriptions of the horrors lest they be viewed as complete cranks.
Likewise the problem faced by anyone pointing out the absurdities of Global Warming hysteria. I’ve had several sensible individuals say to me, “Well there has to be more to it than that, or they wouldn’t be saying that we’re warming the planet.” or words to that effect. Reasonable human beings fall into the trap of assuming that climate “scientists” must be as reasonable as they are. Big mistake.
Inconvenient data…
Checking data used in a graph…damned Canadians.
I just can’t get excited about this stuff any more. The theory was broken irretrievably years ago with the revelations over “hide the decline”. The physics of it never made any sense, and now AR5 is one gigantic retreat from AR4. The so-called science as practiced by CRU is right back where it was in 1980. At the end of it all, the warmers have been unable to come up with one single piece of reliable evidence in support of their theory. Not one.
It’s done. It’s over. Somebody turn out the lights.
Now who are the “deniers”?