Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Yes the bondholders took it in the neck.
Two sides of this
1) Government promises are just that, promises. If they look unkeepable they probably are
2) The buyers of the bonds are individuals of free will and intelligence. Caveat emptor
3) Also proof that the world continues even in default. Protecting bondholders at the cost of all else is folly, which is why GM should have gone bankrupt (it did) why Greece will go bankrupt. Maybe lenders will learn that they need to exercise their authority earlier rather than just hoping that their interest payments roll in, no matter what.
Bottom line, the financial world will unfold in a way that doesnt change much from what you see, the timing may be different but the immutuable need to make 1+1=2 is what drives it all.
“I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”
Yup, all debt is like that. Now the question is, who is the bigger fool, Wimpy for asking, or whoever lends Wimpy the money?
And why should anyone bail out either of them if it all goes wrong, in other words a bad contract.
I read the original story at Zero Hedge last night. When the bonds were issued, the Hungarians had a reasonably functioning economy. In the interim, they were overrun twice, first by Nazis, and then by Commies, both of whom subverted the economy, first to a futile war, and then to a futile ideology.
How does one conclude from this situation that “Government promises are just that, promises. If they look unkeepable they probably are”? Bonds that looked very “keepable” in the mid-30’s look very different when Panzers and T-34’s are running through your streets. And how one extrapolates from that situation to one where both Bush and Will Smith chose to bailout Goldman Sachs (which produces nothing but questionable securities which it talks up while selling and then trashes while shorting, front runs their customers, and trades against their own research and recommendations) while taking over GM (which produces something, even if it’s fashionable to deride their cars) is beyond me.