

Weblog Awards
Best Canadian Blog
2004 - 2007
Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage
email Kate
(goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Support Our Advertisers

Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
The Pence Principle
Poor Richard's Retirement
Pilgrim's Progress

Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
irwin
thanks for the links – just watched the first one – this should be on the mainstream news. How can anyone support Hamas?
Kevin in Sk at January 8, 2009 2:45 PM
The Liberal party is all about division, exclusion and hate now – anything that creates a specific interest group they can say they support. What you see isn’t influence. It is the true colors of the current party membership. It is the logical result of what they started in the Trudeau years.
This started with the patchwork quilt or mosaic movement the Liberals started in the late 60’s around Canada’s 100th birthday. The whole question of what is a Canadian was on everyone’s mind. We didn’t know what we were but we knew what we were not. We were not American! So we had to be different. The mythology that they developed was that the Americans were a melting pot and we were a cultural mosaic, a patchwork quilt where each patch retained its identity and became part of a larger better whole.
So as time passed Canada and the Liberal party took more and more patches into the quilt. Some of those patches were infected with smallpox, but they were put into the quilt anyway. The result is what you have now – in Canada and in the Liberal party. Parts of the quilt just shouldn’t be there.
Parrish stomping on the GWB doll was no big deal, it was just expressing an opinion in a semi-clever way.
The “damn Americans, I hate those bastards” comment WAS a big deal, since it was “hate speech” under the usual leftist rules. That’s when she should have been tossed from the caucus.
ex–it’s not on the MSM because it doesn’t fit in with their world view. That is: Israel always bad oppressors…Palestinians always powerless victims.
The MSM isn’t in the business of disseminating objective information. It’s in the business of editorializing world events.
All I can say is thank God for the internet.
nv53 — I’d disagree with your assessment the doll-stomping incident was clever, even in the slightest degree. I’d also suggest it should have been a big deal in this regard: can you imagine the howls of outrage had a conservative MP stomped on a Hillary Clinton doll? As it was, the Canadian MSM though the Parish stomping was cute and harmless. Double standard.
That said, you’re right insofar as it wasn’t a big deal: it should have been treated as little more than the juvenile outburst that it was. That it was given such wide (and benign) coverage on the CBC and other mainstream Canadian TV reflects as badly on the Canadian media as it did on that twit Parish.
The doll stomp was an outward expression of the Liberal view that to be Canadian is to be anything but American – unless you are an American Canadian, then that is alright (right Iggy).
We all know this is not take any side any more even if I-P do peace the problems in that region is very important and crime and acting unnormal and with no moral in both sides is very unbelievable while one is 3 and other is 7 in guilt still both are wrong to and got directed for so many years.
we cannot expect to resolve over a day to everything in that region become normal still the main outcome affect all world is hate increase among people and can be spread to world or already started in significant among us too. War is end of hate not the beginning of hate so we must get lesson to not allow hate among us go high and prevent it before it is too late example of Israel and Palestine give good lesson other nations
Why Israeli hate Palestinian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5wrwZlwAq8&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tomdEkOgdKU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsFEdv4y5tY&NR=1
============
Verses:
Why Israeli hate Palestinian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1MbOgF9J7o&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVpX1WtDR-w&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdH0XxDEjG4&NR=1
—
we can not spice hate we must get lesson and stop hate in any shape to not lead war
Lil’ new,
You gave me hope today. You started a few sentences with capital letters. So we know that the Shift key on your keyboard is working.
Now only if you could master these:
Period (.)
Comma (,)
Question Mark (?)
I was going to talk about semi-colons (;) but that’s for a future day.
Finally, any chance you could use the excellent Mozilla Firefox browser: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox It has a built-in spell checker. Perhaps with it we’d have some chance of understanding what you meant by this:
“we can not spice hate we must get lesson and stop hate in any shape to not lead war”
I continue to wonder about the significance of ‘Pre 1967 borders’; as I believe I’ve noted in the past, I was in Syria, Iraq, et al, in 1963 and was told by Arabs at that time that they were going to “kill the Jooos”.
“It happened before because rational thought was supplanted by political zeal supported by an efficient propaganda organ. Those days are over.”
Until I read the rest of your comment I thought you were being sarcastic. I get your point and for the most part agree, but this line isolated and taken out of context is pretty funny because this appears to be the case with Barak.
The pre-1967 “borders” are a red herring, and everyone at the top (including Jordan and Egypt) knows it. Even the U.N. recognises that the pre-1967 line is untenable for Israel. Pre-1967, Gaza was part of Egypt, and Jordan had “liberated” Jerusalem and the West Bank, whereupon they began the important work of demolishing as many Jewish structures as possible, to help de-legitamise Jewish claims to Jerusalem. They also set about dealing with the PLO and their attempts on the King of Jordan’s life.
There will be no return to pre-1967 borders, that is a dead issue, because those were purely artificial, and were not internationally recognised state boundaries to begin with. The proper course of action is for Jordan to re-annex the West Bank as it is now, and absorb the residents into Jordan proper (Jordanians are “truer” palestinians), and for Egypt to annex Gaza, and absorb the Gazans into the Egyptian population. There is currently reluctance to do this, but Israel and the US could sweeten the pot for Egypt quite a bit, with boatloads of cash.
In fact I suspect this is the perfect opportunity to solve the Gaza problem once and for all. Israel annihilates Hamas, paving the way for Egyptian entry and rebuilding under Egyptian rule, with generous US/Israeli assistance. Perfect really, as Egypt couldn’t be seen to be waging war on Israel’s behalf. This way there can be much trumpeting of liberation by Egypt…
People, that is about as good as it is ever going to get for the “palestinians” in Gaza. As it currently stands Gaza is as much of a threat to Egypt as to Israel, as an Iranian proxy. Egypt would like nothing better than for Gaza to be “cleaned up” of Jihadis, (conveniently by those “nasty horrible IDF Jews”) and then turned, by Egypt, into a giant beachfront Casino and Resort. Gazans basiaclly speak Egyptian Arabic, and are Egyptians in all but name. Very few people moved TO Gaza in 1967!
The West Bank is already very attractive to Jordan, and under Abbas is far from perfect, but is certainly manageable. Abbas will have to be given some kind of role in the Jordanian state somehow,.
But what is clear to all in the region is that there never was any serious plan by any palestinian leadership to establish a palestinian state of any kind. There just isn’t any sustained interest in a state, despite what Condi and her band of toadies thinks. The latest opportunity given to Gaza to declare statehood, and begin building a country of their own (like the Jews did) was met instead with gleeful opportunism for expanding the Islamic Nazi Jihad. OOoopps. Won’t make that mistake again, said Jordan, Egypt and Israel…
bcf; my only bone of contention would be that both Egypt and especially Jordan consider the Palestinians as toxic. Jordan’s been down that road
http://www.badil.org/Publications/Article74/1998/26i.htm
Reading between the lines, it’d appear that the respondents need a reality check.
No mention there of the rebel Palestinians who nearly tore Jordan apart
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1392701/Karameh-and-the-Palestinian-revolt.html
That little history lesson I’m sure will not be forgotten in Amman.
DaninVan
Those were days long past. Of course they’re viewed as toxic, but only in as much as they are perceived as having a case of sorts. After dismantling the West Bank and Gaza, and absorption, there’d be no further use for the term “palestinians” and any who agitated for any kind of Islamic Workers’ Paradise can be dealt with in the traditional Arab way (you know, since all cultures are equally cool, who’s to say Egypt can’t carpet bomb their own wayward moppets in Gaza, eh)
I suspect with Israel’s help, Gaza and the West Bank would be able to be completely sealed off from Iranian arms shipments, after of course Hamas has been eliminated by Israel.
We’re not talking about the “palestinians” here, we’re talking about returning land to the Arab states, land I’m sure they’d be thrilled to see put to good use. And of course the so-called “palestinians” would probably be relocated and “re educated” by Jordan and Egypt. Hey they could actually get away with that, being non-Caucasian you know… ;o)