It’s the day we play “uterus politics”!
Apparently, since the left can’t really go after Palin on her experience (Obama has equal or less, and he’s running for the TOP job, not the bottom) or her record, which seems very appealing to a reform-minded electorate, the left has settled on the uterine comings-and-goings of not just Sarah Palin but of one of her “witchy-named” daughters, too.
Yes, the washerwomen are whispering and what they’re whispering is imaginative: According to them, Little Trig, (aka “that seriously disabled” Down Syndrome Baby that should have been aborted) whom Palin seems to have taken to the office and breastfed is not Palin’s son but her grandson. One of her daughters, you see, is the actual mother, and oh yes…some of these whisperers even suggest that the baby has an extra chromosome because of…wait for it…incest.
I trust you ladies out there in progressive land are taking notes?
Women being bashed for their right to choose having a family and a career with the support of their spouse.
Women being called sluts, bimbos and brood mares.
Women having their appearance dissected and witchhunts for compromising photos.
Innocent young girls being slandered with rumors & innuendos.
Via Maxed Out Mama – “This stuff really, really convinces women that Democrats are for women:”
Some of us have been pointing this out for a while, you know.
The quote in the post that KS has up is actually one of the more moderate ones………….
Well the website is well and truely named, The Superficial.
Now some callers on CNN radio are suggesting that this is Bristol’s second pregnancy, the first being, of course, little Trig. And the host does nothing but fan the flames! Hey Moonbats. God is NOT on your side. I think it’s someone else with horns on his head.
“Could Bill Stewart be new/food media/haye,etc?”: h.ryan
I stopped reading his post when he “post-graduated” to prolixity.
Simple questions Bill.Yes or No.
Do you think women have the right to control their own bodies?
Do you think women can be successful at a career and still raise a family?
Your family has never had a pregnant teen?
When did you stop beating your wife/kids?
The Palins have responded to the smears…
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/gov-palin-says.html
I doubt, however, that the Leftists and the MSM will stop. But let’s see if they continue. And see what Obama says or doesn’t say about those raving moonbat lunatics he considers his supporters. Is he smearing Palin by proxy? Letting his minions do the dirty poo-chucking work whilst he pseudonobly struts around in his fancy suit, uttering fancy, meaningless slogans, making the brainless Progressicollective swoon?
h.ryan, interesting theory. The bullroar is about the same, just without the fake immigrant shtick.
What about it, Bill?
By the way, not to put spike in your front wheel or anything, but all your prose rests upon a false assumption, as does all of post modernism.
Human nature is not malleable. There’s a fixed set of machinery that culture runs on top of, in the manner of software running on hardware (but far more complex, obviously). Culture, or as you say “discourse” is what we use to mediate between the conditions we find ourselves in and our “mechanical”, as in biological/neurological/physical nature.
Changing the conditions will allow cultures to change. Fiddling with the culture will not change the conditions. Nothing at all changes human nature.
Post Modernism is backwards.
I wonder how long it will take for the Democrats to figure out that the Palin’s pregnant daughter story works against them. It only makes VP candidate more human and exposes the biggest weakness of Obama/Biden: being o phony and pretentious. That is the biggest weakness beside having army of crazy supporters.
Soccermom: “Now some callers on CNN radio are suggesting that this is Bristol’s second pregnancy, the first being, of course, little Trig. And the host does nothing but fan the flames!”
How low can these people go? Already, it’s quite clear that Sarah Palin was pregnant before the birth of Trig. Even the moonbats at KOS have had to back off the slimey slander:
Under a photo of Sarah Palin: “OK, there is a visibly-pregnant Sarah Palin talking with a CBS …Juneau reporter at the Governor’s meeting in…the Alaska legislative session. She clearly appears to be pregnant.”
This rumour-mongering is one of the most disgusting smear campaigns I’ve ever seen. Surely, the position of Vice Presidential candidate, itself, should not be dragged through the mud, let alone the individual running for this office.
The moonbats are utterly beside themselves, they’re hysterical, they’re not thinking straight. As Revnant Dream has put it, they’re having a very public nervous breakdown.
I think they’d better snap out of it. They’re doing inestimable damage to their own candidates. And, if Barack Obama is a leader, he’ll nip all of this disgusting speculation in the bud. It’s in his interest to do so, otherwise his silence could be construed as support for the smear tactics.
It will be interesting to see who is the most tolerant and forgiving of the teens unintended pregnancy – the feminist left or the religious right. I would bet that the loudest outrage will be from the “every lifestyle is a personal choice (unless you disagree with us)” side.
The best thing the democrats could do is have M.Obama make a statement that she, like all mothers with daughters, respect the private and personal nature of the situation. It would show a measure of class and dignity and set the tone for the dem supporters to treat the Palins like opponents not enemies (one of the hallmarks of good sportsmanship).
lynhh…considering the viciousness of the attacks I think nothing left to Obama campaign but to defend Palin……
(….and I thought American soap operas are boring)
LOL – Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party! A Secessionist! YeeHaw!!
The Leftists don’t go after male politicians as viciously, hatefully and recklessly as they’re going after Ms. Palin with their vicious, caustic, hateful, gossip-mongering smears. What does this make the Leftists, if not sexists, misogynists?
And why is it that Bill Clinton can get away with various sex offences, lying under oath, etc., etc., and they only think he’s oh, soooo wonderful nevertheless? I remember how they were so vociferous in defending him and I now marvel at the contrast between that and what they’re doing today.
Leftists are, as we speak, showing us their true colors.
Apparently Leftists believe it’s ok for them to be hateful, as long as they’re Leftists. Being Leftist absolves one of everything, apparently!
CS…add to your list…wonder how many lefty politicians (both sides of the border) have arranged for their teens to have abortions?
Nothing so open minded as sweeping it under the rug, or throwing the baby in the trash.
Phantom, I bow to your superiority. In this thread not only have I been told what “reality” and “the World” are, now I have dogmatically been told that human nature, whatever it is, is not malleable. If you mean, as I suggested above, that you can’t socialize a desk lamp into human society because it doesn’t have the minimum conditions for acceding to human culture, I agree.
But if you mean that human nature is immutable and inevitable, I disagree. In my view, human nature is itself a construct, or at the very least, as Foucault once told Chomsky (who by the way is more inclined to agree with you), there are at least two human natures: the bourgeoisie has a human nature and the proletariat has a very different human nature. Old language, but could fairly easily be translated into current parlance.
Since you know what the true and undisputed human nature is, do tell us who was right: Hobbes or Locke, or was it Mill? Someone else?
So her 17 year-old daughter is pregnant,oh my,like that is so unusual. IMHO,the only way that this will affect Mrs. Palin is that in 4 months she will change from a MILF to a GILF.
look, bill – your postmodernist discourse is, as you say, just your own textuality. It has no reality outside yourself. And I consider it pure pompous blather.
Describing a text as Undergraduate blather is a valid description. It means that you haven’t stepped outside the jargon and critically analzyed it. Describing someone who might potentially disagree with you as ‘pimply faced MA’ is ad hominem.
No, bias is not a synonym for discourse. Bias means an ignorant, uninformed perspective. A discourse can readily be informed and based on facts. You are biased.
What nonsense – your statement that ‘pure ideological chauvinism’ resides in reality. Totally meaningless.
Believe it or not, trapped within conceptualism as you are, there IS a reality outside of your own narcissistic self-absorption. And it exists without you and doesn’t give a damn what you say or discourse about it. A biological cell gets along quite well without your or any, discourse on it.
I can’t stand Derrida’s empty rhetoric.
You don’t understand the term ‘fiction’; it doesn’t mean imaginary. It means socially created, ie, a cultural construct. As I said, we live in both worlds, the factual and the fictional, and the factual, which is hard reality, constrains the fictional.
Eating IS an instinct and is then moulded within the symbolisms and habits of culture. What’s your point?
No, I don’t, as do you, equate the Liberals and Conservatives in their political ideology. The Liberals are corrupt; their ideology has one item; power. The Conservative ideology is focused on the well-being of the country and citizens.
No, because someone posits that the economy is basic to society doesn’t mean they are a Marxist. What nonsense – do you seriously think that Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, Keynes etc – and all those Nobel prizewinners of Economics were Marxists? heh.
Kindly explain how capitalism should be challenged and reformed.
My, my, you do have a fixation on ‘maleness’, don’t you.
Your latest textual rhetoric (you write as if you’ve memorized all the undergrad postmodernist texts)…on leadership is pure rubbish. First, you claimed that Harper was attacking Dion’s ‘masculinity’. Now, you are slithering out of your original attack with:
“Harper represents a controlling, more masculine type of leader and Dion represents a more decentralized, less masculine type of leader.”
Nonsense; these descriptions are empty. Dion isn’t a leader and what the heck is a decentralized leader? Dion doesn’t enable anyone to do anything. You are slithering out of your first attack on Harper which was to tell us that Harper was attacking Dion’s ‘manhood’. Now, you are retracting…
Then, you write:
“ps. I’m not saying the neocons invented smears and dirty politics. I’m simply saying, in part through their success, they helped make them normative. Since it’s now commonplace, no one should be whining about it, least of all neocons”
Bill- you are slithering again. We aren’t talking about the INVENTION of smears and dirty politics. YOU used the term to denigrate the Conservatives. YOU compared them with the ‘neocons’. I asked you to explain yourself and to show how the Conservatives were ‘influenced by neocons’. You said it after all. Don’t change the topic.
And don’t do the smug pompous ‘peace’ ending; that’s a strategy of claiming superiority.
At Rush Limbaugh’s site is a transcript from his show with “The New Face of Feminism” and 2 recent photos of Mrs. Palin and Mrs. Clinton. Under the photos is stated… “Hillary’s place taken by another woman – again”
gotta love Rush, his skin is thick enough to take the crap and he never fails to dish out.
I understand he signed a fairly big contract ($400 million?) covering the next few years, I think it was negotiated with the opinion that Hussien Obama will be the next POTUS and that would provide Rush with sufficient ammo to sell his show.
good luck to those people paying his bills…
Rush loves the McCain-Palin ticket, and so do I.
Clearly the left has really been affected (infected?) by the choice of Palin as running mate, they didn’t see this coming, truly they’ve been blindsided, I hope the worst for them.
Good point, Bluetech.
The Left forgets that if they’re going to get nasty and fabricate smears, they open themselves up to having us non-lefties use the most inconvenient of all damaging truths against them that we mightn’t otherwise have.
But they never see anything coming, so, well, not our problem… if we don’t fight back, with equivalent return fire, they’ll win by cheating, and we can’t allow that.
Hey Bill, here is a good one for you. Eddie Stelmac must be King Phallic, since he beat the sh*t out of Taft, Martin and Hindman. “EH”.
I did see to much dirty politics on the conservative side but the liberal and ndp sure threw it around.
We, who voted for Stelmac are watching pretty close to see where this is leading us.
If people want the equality then work for it. Equality is never appreciated until they receive through work, never appreciated when it is handed to them on a plate.
I see women in the lumber, oil, farm and retail, just name a few who have started out at the “goon spoon end”, the bottom of the heap and worked themselves up to management and this applies to men as well.
It has been handed to people to long and is what now they want. Look at most people entering the work force, people in politics. You do not get good management until they have actually done the job. This means actually working for a living.
Take the two “Dems” for example, they have sucked and been supported by the government of the day for all their life. Now take the two “Reps” for example, one made lots of money and I am quiet sure he has had to step on a few necks to get it, “who cares”. The other on has been a working mother whose husband has had to work to raise and maintain a decent lifestyle for “kids and for themselves” in the far north. I have worked in the Arctic and it is not freaking “izzy monies”.
The right or left can smear or bitch about rights, values, wasted money, wasted time and effort just to name a few. When you attack a persons family, “IE” “such as the did on Sarah Palin’s daughter”, you would be very lucky that they are protected by everybody crying free speech.
As far as the said daughter being pregnant, “SO F*CKING WHAT”, I think that young people haven’t change since I was that age. We did it, they do it. Her decision will be hers and the boys, “NOBODY ELSES”. I am quite sure this was discussed between all parties involved.
That Bill is a grown up decision.
Now take the ones who want the handouts, want the nanny state, the ones that want equality, the ones that want to be on top of management, the ones that want to be in political control are the ones who are not the smartest people or leaders. “THEY JUST KNOW THE SYSTEM AND SUCK OFF THE GOVERMENT TEAT”. You get people who leave their kids in the hospital for the long weekends because they want their four day bash with drugs and alcohol parties, leave their kids at day cares to raise from the time they are old enough to walk until school age and then send them to school. When some thing F*cks up, scream blue bloody murder that it was the government’s fault.
Now take the people who actually work for a living, pinching pennies to bring up their standard of living. These people do not start out in management positions, the have to perform at an acceptable level of work before these said people will be put forth into the management level. You do not hear about these people because they are raising families, making adjustments as their family grows.
The computer and Internet access has opened the world for these people. We are hearing the screams from the nanny state lefts, “which is quite pleasant”. They seem to have trouble putting forth a argument that is really worth reading or listening to before the hard working rights are being called “racist, pigs, anti-socialist” just to name few.
Now the hard working right is fighting back. You will lose because of the right wants to know where their “izzy monies” are being spent.
Bill, I am no learned individual, “never went past grade 9”, but I have worked for a living since I was sixteen, 36 years. I have trained young people in the oil industry for supervisory positions since I was 19 years old. I have seen both sides and the people who had to work for a living has done much better than those that did not.
Usually the people who made it was raised in families with moral guidance, hard work ethics and people who cared what went on around them. This included politics, understanding where their tax dollars went.
The people who were raised on the socialist programs were about one in ten that made it in the same time frame, one in five with multiple job try’s. We just called it, “being hungry”. The ones that did make it was not long in turning to right and saying to the left, “WHAT THE F*CK ARE YOU DOING”.
It has being my experience that I would much rather deal with the people whom have had to work their way to top of management than those who were handed the position.
I do not know, maybe I am off the wall with this one. When McCain asked Palin would you be my VP, I am quite sure that she thought about it and discussed it with “FIRST DUDE”, then with “FAMILY”, then made the adult discussion about the VP position. If they want to sling mud on her family values, “let them”, it will show how low they can get.
The “Dems” are showing a couple of cheap suits and I mean this in the most derogatory manner, because when it comes to dealing with the ultraviolent left, they will fold like a couple of cheap suits.
The “Reps” are showing a couple of real hard working people. Both of them have made decisions based on how they lived and acted. They have faced the leftest comments for a long time, I am quite sure they will handle this one.
Bill, if you had to have the one pushing the button at “3am”, whom would you prefer, somebody that has actually used a gun and brought back food for the table of a government guy who’s been working in the useless department since the beginning of time.
Bill Stewart….boy, you have been hiding in the dialectic woods for too long. The industrial Revolution is over, the world has changed. Lay off Chomsky, try Munger’s “Psychology of human misjudgment”, and if you are stubborn to think about the society in terms of classes, try this: cosmopolitan vs. local.
OT, but the meeting is over and as predicted by many Dion has no agreement with PMSH. And again, Dion has that smirk on his face like a small child, saying, look mommy I tied my shoes by myself. In Dion’s case, he has tied his together.
Liberals are ready and will win the election. Just ask Dion or possibly Jason. Reporters asking where they got the money. Green shift will sell.
this is good.. Palin supported the alaskan separatists.. just like I do.. Vive l’Alaska Libre..
you can see her support message here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4iCDBIAde8
By the way, there is no way that Bristol could be the mother of both Trig and also be five months pregnant. It takes a few months for the woman to be able to become pregnant after a birth.
It is absolutely astonishing how the left, the self-declared haven of ‘tolerance, acceptance, feminism, blah blah’ has exploded in hysteria in reaction to Mrs. Palin being declared the VP nominee.
And why hasn’t Obama told his followers to shut up? Why hasn’t Michelle Obama told his followers to shut up? lynnh – I like your suggestions very much.
bill- you refuse to accept that your views are open to criticism. Other people have different conclusions about reality and the ‘world’. After all, you have informed us of your views of both. What’s wrong with others telling you about their views? Since you believe in individual discourses, then, you can’t conclude that only your discourse is ‘right’.
Phantom wasn’t being ‘dogmatic’ although you certainly are open to such a criticism because you don’t accept the ‘discourse’ of others.
So, you are a follower of Foucault; I’m not. What’s your point about the ‘bourgeoisie and the proletariat’? The fact is, both are, like you, locked into a particular perspective. That’s sad – to be trapped within a discourse and not know that there is reality outside the discourse.
The function of knowledge is to constantly attempt to reach that reality rather than remain trapped within one’s discursive tales. Try reading Karl Popper’s ‘Objective Knowledge’.
Boycott the odious Beagle Blogger for starting the rumour in the first place.
Oh…Poor Kate,
The Palin’s have previously released info that their 18 year old daughter is pregnant….the downe syndrome baby is Sarah’s, not the daughters.
Do you have difficulty shaving in the morning?
Does your nose grow as you tell each lie?
Don’t you feel rediculous now?
“I have said before and I will repeat again: People’s families are off limits,” Obama said. “And people’s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin’s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18, and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics.”
dizzy: Do you have a link for Obama’s telling people to back off Governor Palin and her family? He’s right on target. Good for him.
batb said: “dizzy: Do you have a link for Obama’s telling people to back off Governor Palin and her family? He’s right on target. Good for him.”
Except that he’s defined that turf as part of his sales package, and been caught out on it. He’s now “infamous” “punished with a baby” Pa. speech is loading up on blogs via youtube as we speak, in direct comparison to Gov. Palin’s announcement concerning her daughter’s pregnancy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNzmly28Bmg
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer show had a vicious anti-Palin report on about a half hour ago, with a woman reporter almost drooling with joy as she informed us of the ‘rumours’ that Trig was really Bristol’s child, and that Bristol is, herself, five months pregnant. This reporter then went on to assert that this proves that Sex Education ought to be mandatory in schools and …etc..etc. You get the drift. It was vicious.
Then, a man (didn’t get his name)..chastized CNN for this ‘new low in reporting’; stating that this report by CNN should never have aired; that it was despicable…while Blitzer tried to steer the very valid criticism to a red herring, ie, that ‘sex education ought to be taught in schools’..The real issue was the depths of personal attacks being carried out by the Democratic MSM against Mrs. Palin.
I must say – I haven’t seen such a vicious, hysterical attack against anyone as the Democratic left has launched in the US against Mrs. Palin.
Yes, CNN and Fox and others are indeed reporting that Obama has come out and said that ‘families are off limits’..and that his own mother had him when she was 18.
However, Obama is criticizing Palin that she doesn’t support ‘equal pay for equal work’. The trouble is, they couldn’t provide any evidence of such a claim. They said that McCain didn’t support such ..and therefore, that meant that neither did Palin.
“The Obama campaign could not provide immediate proof Palin’s opposition to Equal Pay – and instead only connected Palin to McCain’s opposition.
“Senator McCain has a clear record of opposing equal pay and as his running mate Governor Palin is tasked with promoting his agenda,” Obama spokesman Jen Psaki says. ”
Heh – so, a VP is a clone of the President? No kidding. But she’s also against the theme of global warming and McCain accepts it; she supports drilling and he’s against it…and..and..
Being illogical is fun if you’re an Obamaist.
Bill Stewart at 2:23 PM
Intellectual masturbation. Worthless.
“equal pay for equal work” is a crock. Its not about paying people the same money to do the same job, its about the government deciding how much different trades are worth and what people should be payed, instead of the market. Its already illegal to pay two people different amounts to do the same job because they are different sexes.
“Leftists are, as we speak, showing us their true colors.
Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at September 1, 2008 3:41 PM”
Even if the McCain/Palin ticket were to lose in November they will have served in pushing the vile nature of the far left so far out into the openly public discourse that one would hope that the voters would finally realize that they, also, must share in wearing the stench. Pendulums swing…
I saw that Wolf segment on CNN with the Bill Bennett exchange. Here Obama had just made a pronouncement telling his constituency to ‘back off!’. Actually impressive; one of the few examples I’ve seen where Ombama seemed genuine, and within minutes it’s all blown apart with the report back from Alaska and Wolf trying to spin it all into flame again. They just can’t help themselves.
Bill Bennett was the man attacking Wolfe. Poor Wolfe kept trying to win the argument but Bill kept it up. The females on the panel were on Wolfe’s side, and John King slipped in when can we get her on the panel and ask her about this and the trooper story. I think the cnn staff knows they have been rebuked. Now some female anchor is saying the govenors family had a secret and had to go public today. If many people know something it is not a secret, cnn was again left out of the loop. Donna Bash lost out when she tried to get negative stories from an Alaskan male delegate. She asked, what do you think of the story Sarah’s daughter is pregnant, he said she needs love and a hug, happened to me and today I am the proud grandfather of an 18 yr old granddaughter who is starting college this fall. It has happend to thousands of american families, life happens. Now cnn is saying it is a bombshell announcement. Why.
They are not Obama’s dogs, but he can call them off…
The video of Bill Bennett is now on you tube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUsrTV_DSuc
ET said
“””””By the way, there is no way that Bristol could be the mother of both Trig and also be five months pregnant. It takes a few months for the woman to be able to become pregnant after a birth.”””””
there is a term, “Irish twins” which is used when childern are less then a year apart by birth. Some are less then 11 month apart, as one of my friends and his sister are, so ET, it is improbable, not impossible.
Fact is years ago there was a reported case were a mother was pregnant twice, 4 months apart. That ment she carried 2 babies at the same time for 4 to 5 months, one was white, the other black, so 2 different fathers. So please be carefull with you assertions, as you contibute much to these dicussions and I hate to see you discredited by these small errors.
Unequal pay is myth. If women would earn less then men, every company would be trying to employ only woman to beat-up competition in labour costs.
Mother’s ready to hit the campaign trail while she’s got a four month old infant.
Meanwhile her seventeen year old daughter announces her pregnancy.
Family values, folks!
I watched the Bennett/Wolfe exchange. I think someone from the control told Wolfe via his ear piece to shut the F up, because it seemed that someone on the panel was going to.
If McCain can get the votes of all the women who were pregnant at their weddings, it’ll be a landslide!
gym – we are talking about probabilities not improbabilities. Trig, the baby was born on April 18, four and a half months ago. Bristol is five months pregnant. OK?
Now, back to the viciousness of the left in their slander and libellous attacks against Palin. I don’t think I’ve seen anything as vicious, irrational as the blind fury of the left against Palin. And especially the leftist women; they are having hysteric fits against her. Why?
It’s pure slander. What CNN did was yellow ‘journalism’; it was pure and open slander.
O’Reilly has pointed out that Daily Kos has been engaged all day in blatant libel of Palin and her daughter – and Obama, after all, had previously shown his support for Daily Kos. Will Obama renounce Daily Kos?
real – how does working the campaign trail and having a five month old show neglect of family values? Are you supposed to sit by the crib? So, her daughter is pregant – and keeping the baby. That’s family.
Real: Your comment is bigotted, sexist, intolerant, and ignorant to boot. There is room for you in leftist politics … I’d give it a try.
Since last Friday, we have been shown, beyond a doubt, that nobody … and I mean nobody … is more bigotted and intolerant than the left. This goes for journalists to the mud-crawlers who sometimes troll this blog. In one fell swoop McCain brought out the worst in the left … where even the Urban Bourgeois Liberals couldn’t contain themselves. It’s as if the curtain was lifted and all the filth was revealed.
My, what a lightning rod this Sarah Palin is.
Kyra Phillips (?), the reporter from Alaska who was the catalyst in the CNN Wolf/Bennett exchange, did a fresh piece just now for Larry King Live. It is insane the mouth-frothing vehemence being demonstrated. How can they hate the lady-Governor from Alaska to such a degree?
BO maybe sincere or he may be laying down a marker in order to per-empt a damaging revelation about his wife and some of the things she has said i.e. anti-white or people she hangs with.
The baby rumour is almost 100% sure to be bogus, but unless we have absolute confirmation that sarah’s daughter is at least 5 months pregnant not 4.5 then we cannot completely rule it out. That said, unless those publishing such rumours have concrete proof they should stfu.
What where watching is simply the collective left having a simultaneous nervous break down. They have no idea how to react so have reverted to atavistic norms. Innuendo piled on slurs with no water.
I am so enjoying the circus. Its like watching clowns fall while trying to do a trapeze act with no net. The lemmings have really soiled themselves this time round. The more they sound off the better. The true face of the progressives has appeared at last.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkEvy-9yVyQ
If O was really serious about calling off the dogs he would fire his supporter/campaigner who was on Meet the Press yesterday, who said they would not attack Sarah, but would let the media do it instead. Seems they are following orders.
Did anyone read/see the first comment from O’s team after the announcement. If that wasn’t a hint to the media to go at her nothing was. He had to make a different comment and try to recind the first one. He said today that he has 2500 working on his campaign (to prove he can lead) and can he guarantee that not one of those 2500 didn’t comment on Kos, or spread rumors on other blogs. I am beginning to think his people are worse than the Clinton clan. Can’t wait till tomorrow to get Rush’s take on all this.
donny n…she wasn’t a product of their media manipulation,that’s why.
“He said today that he has 2500 working on his campaign (to prove he can lead) and can he guarantee that not one of those 2500 didn’t comment on Kos, or spread rumors on other blogs.
maryt…was that a typo…did he say ‘he can guarantee’..?
If he did then either he’s a liar , deluded or a complete control freak with cultish following. It’s impossible to know what 2,500 staff have been up to this w/e.
Silly man. And silly people who would believe such a shallow puff ball statement.