They shoot them just to keep the poor buggers from freezing to death.
30 Replies to “Y2Kyoto: The Great Greenland Polar Bear Extinction”
Normal reaction from hungry bears. Of the AGW Kult will say they are coming ashore to escape drowning,even the Arctic/Antarctic sea ice is at 15 year high levels. Nevermind the little fact that perhaps the seals can’t make their usual blow holes in the thick ice,through which they breathe and the polar bears stalk out for a meal. So no food,they head for better hunting grounds,which happen to be around humans. Oh.And the small fact that polar bear population worlwide is at its highest level since recorded history, >15,000!
OH. My bad. The > sign means “greater than”,for all the liberal artsy lefties out there.
It’s both interesting and alarming to notice that while the coverage in the MSM was wall to wall on the arctic sea ice being at the lowest ebb ever last August, the same can’t be said for the the fact that the winter ice in the western Arctic Ocean is even more dense than back in 1979 when satellite recording began. see: http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=02&fd=16&fy=1979&sm=02&sd=16&sy=2008
Is it an oversight? You be the judge. My guess is is a desire to control the public by controlling what the know! I wonder if Mansbridge will strap on his skis and fly north to cover the the icy buildup? Hey it’s rhetorical.
heh, I wouldn’t mind a polar bear coat, crap this winter has been cold!
Follow the links and post a comment suggesting they phone Churchill Manitoba and learn how to profit by Polar Bears without shooting them.
I*m pressed for time and it requires the register routine. = TG
It’s not the wildlife intruding on our territory, we’re intruding on theirs.
The polar bear population is more than thriving in truth. Problem is truth is not CONVENIENT in this case.
C’mon libforlife and your ilk,you must have a reason for this,after all, was’nt it you or your ilk that said that they were disappearing? Dr.Suzuki said it and it must be true!How could an expert in fruit flies be wrong?
And the ice pack is making it easier for polar bears to get to Iceland too: http://tinyurl.com/2xnr8k
(Note that this report is from February 2007.)
…yes I’m sure that article was Photoshopped.
The > idicator is facing the wrong way.
Should be pointing to the LEFT
Tomax7,
I hope your job has nothing to do with math or science. We learn in grade 3 math that the > symbol eats the larger number. Since there are more than 15,000 polar bears the symbol would eat the population of polar bears rather than the 15,000.
I hope this lesson in math has been informative.
Idd, looks like a couple coats worth on that one, eh? That’s a lot of bear.
There aren’t any trees up there for polar bears to hug, kevmoron.
if I remember correctly , species is defined by breeding limits. If polar bears are just white grizzlies then they shouldnt get special rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly-polar_bear_hybrid
maybe grizzlies should be called Obama bears.
brown fur but white background.
I think the libs raised the license cost for shooting them. the cost for licensing, hunting, shooting and stuffing is around $50,000.00. I could be wrong, tho. about the cost.
The ice between Canada and southwestern Greenland has reached its highest level in 15 years.
Minus 30 degrees Celsius. That’s how cold it’s been in large parts of western Greenland where the population has been bundling up in hats and scarves. At the same time, Denmark’s Meteorological Institute states that the ice between Canada and southwest Greenland right now has reached its greatest extent in 15 years.
‘Satellite pictures show that the ice expansion has extended farther south this year. In fact, it’s a bit past the Nuuk area. We have to go back 15 years to find ice expansion so far south. On the eastern coast it hasn’t been colder than normal, but there has been a good amount of snow.’
But how do these new reports fit in with continual reports that ice in the Arctic Ocean has been melting at a record rate due to increasing temperatures? And isn’t global warming at the top of the political agenda these years?
Shifting weather
If it’s up to meteorologists from Denmark’s Meteorological Institute, there is not anything inherently contradictory that extreme cold is replaced by higher temperatures than average. Or that melting sea ice occasionally is replaced by expanding ice sheets.
‘Weather is a phenomenon which changes from year to year and right now the atmosphere has changed so we have cold weather. That will certainly mean that melting ice in the North Pole will be less this year, but next year the situation can look completely different,’ according to Henriksen.
To sum things up, global warming hasn’t been called off. In the meanwhile, western Greenlanders will have to accept that the cold weather continues for some time. At least until next Tuesday when milder weather could be on the way, according to Polarfronten online.
—————————————- http://sermitsiaq.gl/klima/article30834.ece?lang=EN
KATE JUST ROLLED OVER 7,800,000 VISITS
… looks like a couple coats worth on that one, eh? That’s a lot of bear.
Posted by: The Phantom at February 17, 2008 8:19 PM
For sure, enough for the whole family and a couple of fur lined boots as well.
;~)
On Friday morning, even the CBC was running a report out of Iqualuit that the sea ice on Frobisher Bay was approaching its long-term normal thickness…
Al Gore lied completly in the part from his junk science movie since polar bears are exelent swimmers. FEED THE GREENS TO THE POLAR BEARS
Oh wow, you cons have figured it out, Northern Canadian water gets hard in winter. Well done cons.
I’ve no idea how Roast Polar Bear would taste…but, as others have noted, that example in the photo would sure make a nice coat, matching boots and hat ensemble.
My sister has one of those seal jackets (you know, the seals you naughty Canucks club to death). She paid a lot of money for it, I personally think it’s a gorgeous jacket, looks great on her. However, since she found out how the seals are harvested, she won’t wear it.
When I pointed out she eats beef, mutton and pork, wears leather and wool products, she says “that’s different”. She’s really not a lefty or an eco-warrior fanatic, actually a very nice person AND, I’m glad to say, a registered Republican. Well, her money, her jacket, her business, I guess. 🙂
Me no likey picture!
That bear is just a big dead animal. Actually it looks a lot like the small dead hamster .
There’s a witty comment or two over at the link. I had a good laugh at the one that went on about “phenomenon only occurs where great masses of Caucasians are gathered. North America and Europe come immediately to mind. CO2 emissions from non-Caucasians can be eliminated from this discussion, just because… Give your money to the Chinese, and the plants will take a rest. I am sure of it. Many scientists say so. Especially the really good scientists.”
Yo, libforlife, according to queen stephi, citizen de france, by now there was supposed no ice in the arctic at all. You know, Manitoba was supposed to be flooded by all of that melting arctic ice? We were all supposed to be able to walk around in short pants in January?
So, excuse us if we want to gloat a bit. Your precious little AGW is not living up to it’s billing, and it is our duty as realists to point that out whenever the EVIDENCE contradicts queen stephi, citizen de france.
LIBRANO ARSEHOLE!
“Your precious little AGW is not living up to it’s billing”
Bity by bit, a whole political hustle is collapsing – just about the time that dion is planning to run an election on it.
*lol* kevmoron came up short, and can’t even make a decent comeback. Total proof of the liberal capacity for thought. I can see why you would not want to ban her, Kate.
Winter still has a month to go, and in the north quite a bit longer. It will be interesting to see just how extensive the ice gets, both in range and thickness.
Yo, kingstonlad it’s winter, it’s cold. One would think after all that has been said about climate change over the past few years you would have at least learned the basics of it all.
Your ignorance is showing.
CON MORON
30 years ago the same “scientists” who are screeching now about “global warming” were telling us that by now we should be covered by glaciers. So which is it? You can not have it both ways, fools. Well, you think you can by changing a few words while demanding that everyone except yourselves, China and India pay through the nose to “protect Gaia”. The only ones who continue to be fooled by your shite are your tin foil hat wearing fellow travelers. You see, we know it is not about the planet, it is about your political agenda.
20 years ago the same people were screeching about “saving the rainforest” because it is the “lungs of the earth”. That pretty much quieted down when they finally discovered that they couldn’t blame Halliburton and Bush for burning the forests-it was their “noble savages” who were with their slash and burn farming techniques. you know they can’t say anything bad about them because of the fact that they aren’t white and aren’t Americans.
Here is an idea for you “Gaiaistas”-if you are so concerned about the effect humans have on the planet commit suicide right now. You will be doing your bit to “save Gaia” and you will keep the earth cooler by the elimination of all the hot air that comes bloviating forth from you. Come on, put your beliefs (and a loaded .45) where your mouths are.
oh…one more thing…
Memo to libforlifetard:
Here is a handy little graph for you that even you can understand. http://www.scotese.com/images/globaltemp.jpg
You will note that in actuality the planet is a couple degrees below it’s average temperature over it’s history. Also, you will note that most of the great extinctions took place during the “cold spells”. If you actually knew something about paleogeography and paleoclimatology you would understand that the only constant about the climate of the earth IS change. If you actually knew something about paleogeography and paleoclimatology you would understand if you really want “climate change” about the only way mankind would be able to drastically effect it like you constantly screech that we are is to blow about a 100 mile chunk out of the Isthmus of Panama. That would fundamentally change the ocean currents. As for right now overfishing is doing more damage to the overall climate of the Earth then anything else, including those “evil SUV’s”. Why? Because no fish=nothing eating the zooplankton which equals the zooplankton over grazing on the phytoplankton which are the true “lungs” of the Earth.
Of course I fully expect you to start lobbing your AGW propaganda as “fact” much like a monkey flings its feces but all that will serve to do is to make you look like an even bigger fool then you already are.
The eskimos know how to use polar bears and they know how to use seals as well
Normal reaction from hungry bears. Of the AGW Kult will say they are coming ashore to escape drowning,even the Arctic/Antarctic sea ice is at 15 year high levels. Nevermind the little fact that perhaps the seals can’t make their usual blow holes in the thick ice,through which they breathe and the polar bears stalk out for a meal. So no food,they head for better hunting grounds,which happen to be around humans. Oh.And the small fact that polar bear population worlwide is at its highest level since recorded history, >15,000!
OH. My bad. The > sign means “greater than”,for all the liberal artsy lefties out there.
It’s both interesting and alarming to notice that while the coverage in the MSM was wall to wall on the arctic sea ice being at the lowest ebb ever last August, the same can’t be said for the the fact that the winter ice in the western Arctic Ocean is even more dense than back in 1979 when satellite recording began. see: http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=02&fd=16&fy=1979&sm=02&sd=16&sy=2008
Is it an oversight? You be the judge. My guess is is a desire to control the public by controlling what the know! I wonder if Mansbridge will strap on his skis and fly north to cover the the icy buildup? Hey it’s rhetorical.
heh, I wouldn’t mind a polar bear coat, crap this winter has been cold!
Follow the links and post a comment suggesting they phone Churchill Manitoba and learn how to profit by Polar Bears without shooting them.
I*m pressed for time and it requires the register routine. = TG
It’s not the wildlife intruding on our territory, we’re intruding on theirs.
The polar bear population is more than thriving in truth. Problem is truth is not CONVENIENT in this case.
C’mon libforlife and your ilk,you must have a reason for this,after all, was’nt it you or your ilk that said that they were disappearing? Dr.Suzuki said it and it must be true!How could an expert in fruit flies be wrong?
And the ice pack is making it easier for polar bears to get to Iceland too:
http://tinyurl.com/2xnr8k
(Note that this report is from February 2007.)
…yes I’m sure that article was Photoshopped.
The > idicator is facing the wrong way.
Should be pointing to the LEFT
Tomax7,
I hope your job has nothing to do with math or science. We learn in grade 3 math that the > symbol eats the larger number. Since there are more than 15,000 polar bears the symbol would eat the population of polar bears rather than the 15,000.
I hope this lesson in math has been informative.
Idd, looks like a couple coats worth on that one, eh? That’s a lot of bear.
There aren’t any trees up there for polar bears to hug, kevmoron.
if I remember correctly , species is defined by breeding limits. If polar bears are just white grizzlies then they shouldnt get special rights.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly-polar_bear_hybrid
maybe grizzlies should be called Obama bears.
brown fur but white background.
I think the libs raised the license cost for shooting them. the cost for licensing, hunting, shooting and stuffing is around $50,000.00. I could be wrong, tho. about the cost.
The ice between Canada and southwestern Greenland has reached its highest level in 15 years.
Minus 30 degrees Celsius. That’s how cold it’s been in large parts of western Greenland where the population has been bundling up in hats and scarves. At the same time, Denmark’s Meteorological Institute states that the ice between Canada and southwest Greenland right now has reached its greatest extent in 15 years.
‘Satellite pictures show that the ice expansion has extended farther south this year. In fact, it’s a bit past the Nuuk area. We have to go back 15 years to find ice expansion so far south. On the eastern coast it hasn’t been colder than normal, but there has been a good amount of snow.’
But how do these new reports fit in with continual reports that ice in the Arctic Ocean has been melting at a record rate due to increasing temperatures? And isn’t global warming at the top of the political agenda these years?
Shifting weather
If it’s up to meteorologists from Denmark’s Meteorological Institute, there is not anything inherently contradictory that extreme cold is replaced by higher temperatures than average. Or that melting sea ice occasionally is replaced by expanding ice sheets.
‘Weather is a phenomenon which changes from year to year and right now the atmosphere has changed so we have cold weather. That will certainly mean that melting ice in the North Pole will be less this year, but next year the situation can look completely different,’ according to Henriksen.
To sum things up, global warming hasn’t been called off. In the meanwhile, western Greenlanders will have to accept that the cold weather continues for some time. At least until next Tuesday when milder weather could be on the way, according to Polarfronten online.
—————————————-
http://sermitsiaq.gl/klima/article30834.ece?lang=EN
KATE JUST ROLLED OVER 7,800,000 VISITS
… looks like a couple coats worth on that one, eh? That’s a lot of bear.
Posted by: The Phantom at February 17, 2008 8:19 PM
For sure, enough for the whole family and a couple of fur lined boots as well.
;~)
On Friday morning, even the CBC was running a report out of Iqualuit that the sea ice on Frobisher Bay was approaching its long-term normal thickness…
Al Gore lied completly in the part from his junk science movie since polar bears are exelent swimmers. FEED THE GREENS TO THE POLAR BEARS
Oh wow, you cons have figured it out, Northern Canadian water gets hard in winter. Well done cons.
I’ve no idea how Roast Polar Bear would taste…but, as others have noted, that example in the photo would sure make a nice coat, matching boots and hat ensemble.
My sister has one of those seal jackets (you know, the seals you naughty Canucks club to death). She paid a lot of money for it, I personally think it’s a gorgeous jacket, looks great on her. However, since she found out how the seals are harvested, she won’t wear it.
When I pointed out she eats beef, mutton and pork, wears leather and wool products, she says “that’s different”. She’s really not a lefty or an eco-warrior fanatic, actually a very nice person AND, I’m glad to say, a registered Republican. Well, her money, her jacket, her business, I guess. 🙂
Me no likey picture!
That bear is just a big dead animal. Actually it looks a lot like the small dead hamster .
There’s a witty comment or two over at the link. I had a good laugh at the one that went on about “phenomenon only occurs where great masses of Caucasians are gathered. North America and Europe come immediately to mind. CO2 emissions from non-Caucasians can be eliminated from this discussion, just because… Give your money to the Chinese, and the plants will take a rest. I am sure of it. Many scientists say so. Especially the really good scientists.”
Yo, libforlife, according to queen stephi, citizen de france, by now there was supposed no ice in the arctic at all. You know, Manitoba was supposed to be flooded by all of that melting arctic ice? We were all supposed to be able to walk around in short pants in January?
So, excuse us if we want to gloat a bit. Your precious little AGW is not living up to it’s billing, and it is our duty as realists to point that out whenever the EVIDENCE contradicts queen stephi, citizen de france.
LIBRANO ARSEHOLE!
“Your precious little AGW is not living up to it’s billing”
Bity by bit, a whole political hustle is collapsing – just about the time that dion is planning to run an election on it.
*lol* kevmoron came up short, and can’t even make a decent comeback. Total proof of the liberal capacity for thought. I can see why you would not want to ban her, Kate.
Winter still has a month to go, and in the north quite a bit longer. It will be interesting to see just how extensive the ice gets, both in range and thickness.
Yo, kingstonlad it’s winter, it’s cold. One would think after all that has been said about climate change over the past few years you would have at least learned the basics of it all.
Your ignorance is showing.
CON MORON
30 years ago the same “scientists” who are screeching now about “global warming” were telling us that by now we should be covered by glaciers. So which is it? You can not have it both ways, fools. Well, you think you can by changing a few words while demanding that everyone except yourselves, China and India pay through the nose to “protect Gaia”. The only ones who continue to be fooled by your shite are your tin foil hat wearing fellow travelers. You see, we know it is not about the planet, it is about your political agenda.
20 years ago the same people were screeching about “saving the rainforest” because it is the “lungs of the earth”. That pretty much quieted down when they finally discovered that they couldn’t blame Halliburton and Bush for burning the forests-it was their “noble savages” who were with their slash and burn farming techniques. you know they can’t say anything bad about them because of the fact that they aren’t white and aren’t Americans.
Here is an idea for you “Gaiaistas”-if you are so concerned about the effect humans have on the planet commit suicide right now. You will be doing your bit to “save Gaia” and you will keep the earth cooler by the elimination of all the hot air that comes bloviating forth from you. Come on, put your beliefs (and a loaded .45) where your mouths are.
oh…one more thing…
Memo to libforlifetard:
Here is a handy little graph for you that even you can understand. http://www.scotese.com/images/globaltemp.jpg
You will note that in actuality the planet is a couple degrees below it’s average temperature over it’s history. Also, you will note that most of the great extinctions took place during the “cold spells”. If you actually knew something about paleogeography and paleoclimatology you would understand that the only constant about the climate of the earth IS change. If you actually knew something about paleogeography and paleoclimatology you would understand if you really want “climate change” about the only way mankind would be able to drastically effect it like you constantly screech that we are is to blow about a 100 mile chunk out of the Isthmus of Panama. That would fundamentally change the ocean currents. As for right now overfishing is doing more damage to the overall climate of the Earth then anything else, including those “evil SUV’s”. Why? Because no fish=nothing eating the zooplankton which equals the zooplankton over grazing on the phytoplankton which are the true “lungs” of the Earth.
Of course I fully expect you to start lobbing your AGW propaganda as “fact” much like a monkey flings its feces but all that will serve to do is to make you look like an even bigger fool then you already are.
The eskimos know how to use polar bears and they know how to use seals as well