It’s on days like today, with the mercury dropping and a blizzard blowing in, that an urge comes over me to visit the garage and spend a little time with a sleeping Aretha. (From better times).
After all, we share a few secrets. *
329 Replies to “Enriching Their Folklore”
the only joke here is mcmillan and the clumsy oafs who drool over a shitty photo of kkkkate on her substitute penis while ignoring the twisted ego that thinks surviving the holocaust is funny.
Jeffy, pablum a bit to thick to swallow this morning? Maybe they’ll untie your arms and let you eat it with a spoon tomorrow.
This is just great!
Thank you Kate!
Classic dufuss outing!
Kathy: I think you ought to use your website to illustrate how the Canadian Muslim community is “rife” with anti-Semitism. And since SDA is littered with literary experts (see comments about speling etc…) I’m certain folks will look up “rife” in the dictionary before proceeding…
Listen, folks: the issue isn’t spelling. Is it? No. The issues have been free vs hate speech and currently what-was-Kate-thinking when she chuckled herself silly penning a concentration camp tattoo on her arm…
Lots of y’ll are witty. Great. Funny too. That’s not the point. You are not for tolerance. Most of you appear to be against tolerance. Or, more likely, you would like to keep the focus on the intolerance that exists within Islam, radical and otherwise.
What’s the diff, please tell me. between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?
Kinsella’s a victim of his own rush to use others to further his goals of limiting free speech. Nothing more, nothing less. To quote Ezra (because he puts it so well): Kate’s prank was not an eloquent witticism. It was a blunt demonstration of Kinsella’s lack of Internet street smarts, and of the double standard he himself holds when it comes to insensitive comments.
“No one ought to use Holocaust imagery as a joke to make a point.”
How do you explain the headline last week
‘White pride’ website hails Victoria MP as hero
Liberal MP wins unwelcome praise from white supremacists for free speech stand.
This for someone thinking that maybe, just maybe the hate legislation in section 13, including the administrative process, may be granting a little too much power to unaccountable civil servants.
This is a black and white power play. Some people want to tell others how they should think. And will twist any truth, smear anyone’s character to win their argument. This isn’t about something that happened 65 years ago.
Derek
“What’s the diff, please tell me. between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?”
Millions of corpses.
Interesting to note the selective outrage. If this had been a bit of CBC satire, sanctioned and funded by the government, then the alleged cultural elite wuld have jumped to its hind legs to defend it. Anyone disagreeing would have been given a pitying smirk, and sentenced to watch endless tapes of Rick Mercer. A toronto star columnist would have condescendingly scolded people about how it was good because it raised awareness about the issue.
But it wasn’t, so dullwitted – hi jeff! – people feel empowered to be outraged.
It was a blunt demonstration of Kinsella’s lack of Internet street smarts, and of the double standard he himself holds when it comes to insensitive comments.
–Yes. Of course, that’s not surprising, considering that Warren suffers from Liberal mental disorder.
Liberals have been getting away with worse than we’re saying about them lately. Yet they squeal as if they’re innocent victims!
‘Kate’s prank was not an eloquent witticism.”
Very true. It was not.
So – we’re now conceding it WAS Kate’s prank? I no longer have to worry (cough) about being sued?
Damn. I was just going to bite the bullet and join Ezra’s Union for protection.
you do realize that all you hateful idiots are also pyschopaths and sociopaths, right?
adolfs balllickers is what you pugs are.
I can’t help thinking that this was a big mistake on your part.
“You are not for tolerance. Most of you appear to be against tolerance.”
Bwaaaah ha ha ha ha ha ha hew wow…probably the most circular argument I’ve seen… unless there is some arcane mysticism to grasping the “true meaning” of blatant gibberish masquerading as moral exhibitionism.
Everyone is intolerant or we would not exist in this plane of reality…you seem pretty intolerant of dissenting opinion yourself.
so i’m a pug eh ?….so call me a mug a pug and a thug too…see if i care..as long as you don’t call me a dirty Methodist.
This post is called,
Enriching Their Folklore
Folklore; (Merriam Webster 3’definition) an often unsupported notion, story, or saying that is widely circulated.
I do not know if this was her intent but I think Kate has succeeded in enriching Kinsella’s (and the left’s) folklore.
Now their folklore will include made up stories of Kate making fun of the Holocaust and being anti-Semite (definitely an unsupported notion)
when it is obvious she was making fun of Kinsella.
as the story is repeated to Liberal kids around a camp fire to scare them, expect some story embellishment with time.
that’s all folks!
Interesting that the Leftists commenting are siding with a man who refuses to condemn the Islamofascists.
Can anyone provide a link to a Kinsella condemnation of Mohammed Elmasry’s declaration that all Jews in Israel over 18 are legitimate targets for murder?
What about condemnation of Syed Soharwardy’s call for Sharia Law to be the law of the land in Canada?
Where’s Kinsella’s condemnation of the intolerant, anti-Semitic Islamic fascists?
Well?
Jason, try harder. You’ve been clearly able to “help thinking” in the past. Think about this: where in Kate’s post, is the Holocaust mentioned? This baby is entirely your bud’s doing. Sucks to be named WK this morning.
“I can’t help thinking that this was a big mistake on your part.” Jason Cherniak
Jason you’re fogettin, PET, gave Kate the right to free speech, you said so yourself. Now go away lest we Christians decide to sacrifice you first in order to expedite the 2nd coming.
Rich Fisher: The difference between Muslim and non million intolerance is a “few million corpses…” Really? When did the body count start?
JD, let’s talk “tolerance”, shall we?
SDAers are not in favour of hauling our ideological/political opponents before a state kangaroo court to “settle” our disputes, e.g., have the state do our dirty work by harassing and substantially punishing law abiding fellow citizens with whom we disagree. In fact, the position of most of us, which you somehow seem to have missed, is that there should be great latitude—the tolerance you claim to favour—for a wide spectrum of opinion, including that which is truly offensive.
Perhaps you haven’t noticed the invective of the Left towards those they perceive as their enemies—you know, David Suzuki’s call for politicians who don’t fall in lock step with his agenda should be jailed (ironically, that would have to include Dion, for sure!); Hedy Fry’s burning crosses, etc.
We believe that the best way to deal with offensive speech is to expose it and critique it. WK’s speech is often odious: note his latest insults to Kate. In fact, being offensive appears to be his modus operandi. Kate one upped him in his silly game and he fell for it.
JD asks, “What’s the diff, please tell me. [sic] between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?” A very, very short list:
1) Muslim intolerance—“We keeeell you”—is much more virulent than the non Muslim variety. E.g., Did you know that the imams who stirred up all the trouble in the ME about the ho-hum Danish cartoons—people were KILLED—INSERTED two really offensive ones, which really were odious and very different from the originals. (To my knowledge, one showed Mohammed with the face of a pig. The other showed a dog sodomizing a Muslim man bent over on prayer.) After faking the evidence, the imams then whipped up a lethal frenzy.
Imams all over the world, in their sermons and teachings, say the most vile things about Jews and other infidels. Check it out, JD.
2) In Canada, Muslims often choose to very intolerantly ignore and even contravene our conventions and laws (both “equality” and criminal)—think: hateful sermons and teachings, gross misogyny, including honour killings, taxi drivers refusing to transport booze or dogs, checkout clerks refusing to bag pork, etc., —while squeezing the last entitlement out of the state and expecting the “tolerance” of their fellow Canadians, without which their harassment of us would never be tolerated!
3) Muslims are also quite prepared to use the jackboot of the state, via our kangaroo courts, to go after those whose speech—pablum compared to the poison they spout—to harass and punish, at taxpayer expense, those whom they perceive to be their enemies. If they don’t like Levant’s or Steyn’s publications or opinions, why not argue their point of view persuasively so that people will side with them? What a novel idea for the Muslim leadership, who seem used to having tantrums and bullying their opponents. JD, I think I’d call THAT intolerance.
4) I’d also call Muslim intolerance altogether arrogant and hypocritical. They DEMAND rights and entitlements they’re willing to use the state to enforce, in order to deny the rights of host Canadians, whose good will allowed these people to be here in the fist place.
5) In short, for Muslims, tolerance is altogether a one way street: YOU tolerate whatever we say we want tolerated. And, BTW, we reserve the right to not tolerate anything we don’t wish to. Get used to it.
As I said, JD, this is a VERY short list, typed up on the spot. Couldn’t you have come up with examples like these? If not, why not?
Kate, thanks again this morning for pulling this off. I even see Kinsella’s bosom buddy Cheriak here. I think the best part of the whole thing is the comments posted by the lefties, they are still so brainwashed that they are blaming you for Kinsella’s outing, and outing it was, probably the best on the internet, truly worthy of a blog award. Of course the left have to rise up in defense of Kinsella, for they can never, ever admit that one of the salesmen that sold them the “Emperor’s Clothes” has been nothing but one of a group of charlatans conning them for most of their adult live’s. They can never admit to being conned so they are truly doomed to exist in their own little “Shangrila”. I just wish that they would take their juvenile arguments back where Kinsella was taking pictures, where they belong.
All the lefty retards with their panties in a knot really makes my day.Now as a conservative voter I think I’ll go to a lefty site and announce my outrage over….wait a minute,I have a life.
Too bad a post like this NEVER stays on topic!
Hey Warren !!!
Where does the fact that you are continually being shown as a fool and hypocrite go in your version of reality? Certainly does not seem to sink in between your ears.
Warren has his collection of responses up. Unsurprisingly everyone apparently agrees with him.
To all those writing here in support of the righteous Liberal Warren Kinsella, you should go do a bit of background research on how the Liberal Party of Canada has voted on UN resolutions with regards to Israel.
Now come back and tell me that the LPC or Warren K are deserving of the self appointed position of standing up for Jews.
Don’t be fooled by the high dudgeon though, Warren is releived to no be talking about Richard Warman, HRC’s and free speech – having had his hat handed to him by Kate, Kathy, Ezra and Steyn (not to mention in editorials) on a daily basis for the last couple of weeks.
Despite the obvious youth of the ‘skin,’ Kinsella, assumed it was indeed from a holocaust survivor. This assumption based on his arrogant championing of section 13.1. And more importantly his failure at it.
Therefore, he jumped at the conclusion. ‘At last, vindication!’
However, he has a more important problem. In his supposed ‘good fight’, he backs the charges against both Levant and Steyn. Both charges brought by unmistakably anti-Semetic racists. Elmasry, for example, has publicly condoned killing all Israelis 18 and over. And the Calgary Imam peddles Shariah in Canada, which is legally defined and accepted anti-Semetism, amongst other ‘legal’ abominations against women and non-Muslims.
This is beyond hypocrisy. So, which is it Warren, are you an anti-Semitic racist, or do you just like holding two opposite opinions at the same time?
Warren has his collection of responses up. Unsurprisingly everyone apparently agrees with him.
Thanks for saving me a click to view what I knew would be the inevitable result of the individual-in-question’s appeal to “right-think conservatives.”
I’d like to think his moment of fame is nearly over.
I’ve said this before, but no hurt in reiterating the point. When Kinsella et al were leading the charge for Chretien during the 2000 election; Kinsella ridiculed Day’s beliefs in Christianity and Creationism. Kinsella’s ridicule of Day was witnessed nationwide and probably in some international regions as well.
It would be interesting to know how Kinsella would handle it if a complaint should be laid against him with the CHRC. I truly wonder if one should be brought forth.
Ward…the sound of chirping crickets will be the only response you’ll get from the moonbats regarding your last post.
I See there is still a vast amount of confusion (Mostly coming from the left end of the gene pool) as to what this is all about.
It wasn’t meant to be humorous…
It was meant to expose the venality of those who claim to be Canada’s adhoc Simon Weisenthals…the nescient shallowness that cannot tell a genuine death camp tattoo from a Motorcycle serial number is the same shallow mentality that can’t tell a Nazi from a popcorn fart….The special K cult are like malicious Keystone cops with way too much access to the administrative power to destroy lives with their deluded perspectives of anti-Semitism.
That’s why the special K kids create the dream scape of “hate”…when true genocidal Nazis do not exist, one must manufacture them for one’s own enrichment as a “nazi hunter”. When anti-semitic intolerance DOES exist in a politically inconvenient locale, one ignores it and focuses instead on fly specs.
Grant Bristow and Lucy Warman know all about fabricating “hate”. Radical Islam knows all about genocidal anti-Semitism….but the special K witch hunt cult ignores the inconvenient truth to sell the convenient myth.
It’s also about the hypocrisy inherent in moral exhibitionism…which has been amply displayed here and elsewhere with moral crusaders engaging in a lot of their own “hating” and “intolerance”.
And it’s about the morbid lack of perspective in the PC witch hunt cult demonstrated by interpreting Kate’s campy prank as being akin to a crime against humanity.
Lastly it’s about dual standards…the do as I preach not as I do mentality that will mock and condemn a Christian faith and publicly defame it’s adherents (with purple dinosaur pranks or worse) which is so quick to label any criticism or commentary other than its own as “hate crimes”.
As for Jews…this prank wasn’t about Jews, it was about exposing hypocritical sycophants who create civil injustice by reflexively reacting to false perspective.
For Holocaust survivors or victims the worst outrage you can do them is to allow shallow political opportunists use the injustice done them to justify more civil injustice.
Section 13 and its malevolent witch hunt cult have created civil injustice in the name of correcting civil injustice.
My quote above from the individual-in-question’s comment should be “right-thinking conservatives.”
Somehow I happened to be thinking of “group-think” as I wrote. I’m sure I don’t know why.
This is one of the first times I have been to this blog and i just have to say that I can’t figure out how anyone could think this is funny or even more bizarrely “genius”?
All it shows to me is unusual behavior. If i got an e-mail like that as a joke from someone I hardly knew i would consider it frightening in how far it was. Imagine getting that in the e-mail as a joke?
At best this is an example of great idiocy. And it is obvious that it is such.
Cue the indignation,cue the”I’ll never visit this site again”.Moonbats are so typical.
To those who state we should not belittle the Holocaust, I say: Get a grip! Are we supposed to speak in hushed tones, with our heads down and then say a little prayer everytime the Holocaust is mentioned? Not a chance!
The Holocaust was horrible, an utter depravity, a symbol of how low humans can sink. BUT IT IS NOT THE ONLY EXAMPLE! What about Vietnam? Rwanda? Russia? Darfur? Iraq? Armenia? Are we supposed to live our lives speaking about THOSE occurrences in hushed tones, with our heads down and saying a little prayer?
What about the Viking raids? What about the Roman invasions of Europe and Britain? What about the Spanish invading Central America?
Why stop there? What about slavery in the States? Muslim atrocities? Christian atrocities? Secular atrocities?
Pretty soon, once you’ve compiled a list of all the terrible things that humans have done to one another, you’ll find that there is NOTHING you can talk about!
So, I will NOT stop talking about the Holocaust anyway I choose. Would I make fun of it? NO! Just like I wouldn’t make fun of ANY of the OTHER atrocities committed by mankind.
As far as this prank goes, I just cannot see how Kate’s prank makes light of the Holocaust in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. If you think so, I suggest that there is a problem with your perception.
Please, detractors…do tell. EXACTLY HOW does this prank make fun of or belittle the Holocaust? Other than she didn’t do it in hushed tones, with her head down and saying a little prayer? She showed the Wicked Wizard of Spin a tattoo of a number and let him do the rest…the problem lies with Kinsella, not Kate.
Get a grip! Get a clue! Get a sense of humour!
I say, bravo Kate!
Lookout: I’ll read your post and respond when I have a moment, later. If it’s serious, that is. If it’s the usual smartass stuff that attempts to pass itself off as commentary here, then I’ll pass, thanks…
I would very much like to know: where is Kate?
“If i got an e-mail like that as a joke from someone I hardly knew i would consider it frightening in how far it was.”
Um, “David Tudor” – if that is your real name, Warren Kinsella – your irrational fears are not the concern of the masses. Have you tried an adult diaper such as Depends? Do what the rest of us do and cope and stop whining like a titty baby.
Christians and Muslims get insulted every day here at SDA and elsewhere; it’s time for some people to get off the short bus and stop the pathetic whining.
However, David Tudor,
Had you read some of the comments prior to yours, you might have a better perspective.
Warren Kinsella is championing proven anti-Semetic racists in their charges against Levant and Steyn.
Is this acceptable?
He is also an associate and supporter of Richard Warman, who pulls entrapment pranks on Nazi websites, posing as a racist and uttering unbelievably anti-Semetic racist comments. As well as writing racist comments against Ann Cools.
Is this acceptable?
Kinsella has also publicly and in the press ridiculed prominent politicians, such as Stockwell Day, simply because of their Christian faith.
Is this acceptable?
While he feels he has the right to freely support racists and make unbelievably bigoted comments in public, he wants to shut down free speech for the rest of us.
This is what the slithering snake, Kinsella, is all about.
Despite the obviousness of the prank, he gladly assumed that this motorbike ‘serial number’ was from a holocaust survivor and posted it in an attempt to show his own self-serving vindication.
The fact of the matter is, how can he be vindicated from his outright support and championing of anti-Semetic racists? How can anybody show support for the bigot, Kinsella, when he publicly derides a politician, simply because he is a Christian? At the very least, how can anybody take this person’s side when he holds two opposing viewpoints at the same time?
The question remains, is Warren Kinsella a racist bigot? And if it takes something like this to force his unsavoury, racist and bigoted actions and statements into the spotlight, then so be it.
I almost felt bad because it was like clubbing a baby seal. Actually, it was different than that. It was like giving a baby seal a club and watching it beat itself…
You can read the e-mail exchange between “Eitan” and Kinsella here: http://no-libs.com/?p=2129
“Now their folklore will include made up stories of Kate making fun of the Holocaust”
It does seem to fit in nicely with Kate’s documented bigotry towards native people, blacks, arabs and muslims.
Kind of like…y’know…a pattern?…a trend..a Leitmotiv? (that’s German), if you will.
“frightening in how far it was”
Grover, on Sesame Street, doing his “Near” and “Far” schtick must have been unbearably life altering for you Dave.
Fear NOT those radical muppets Dave, we are “near”.
Comments reposted at http://www.warrenkinsella.com:
• Sandy [Crux-of-the-Matter]: As a Blogging Tory and a slightly to the right thinker, I am appalled at what Kate at Small Dead Animals has done. Right or left thinking has absolutely nothing to do with being a racist or making light of the Holocaust. Or, at least it shouldn’t. What possible gain can anyone get at trying to make a fool out of a fellow blogger — no matter what our political differences? While someone may disagree with WK from time to time, and I do regularly, why on earth in the name of good taste and decency, is it necessary to embark on some kind of gotcha operation like this? When I was in barely out of my teens, during 1961, I spend some time studying in Toronto. I had a flat in a house where the woman of the house was in Israel for most of the year I was there. Both she and her husband had numbers on their arms. Their story was horrendous and yet they survived with grace and dignity. She was away because she was a witness at the trial of Adolf Eichmann. No, there is nothing funny or satirical in what Kate did. For shame!
• Ezra Levant: Kate’s is not a prank I would have done. I’ve been to Yad Vashem too often to be irreverent about tattoos on Holocaust survivors. I’ll grant Kinsella that it was humour in questionable taste.
• A.L. Wudrick: Kate made a joke in extremely bad taste. I don’t find it funny at all. I think she’s making light of a serious factual historical tragedy. I think it’s insulting to Jews, and shows poor judgment. It suggests she’s more interested in making Warren Kinsella look stupid than demonstrating she has any compassion for survivors of the Holocaust.
• Damian Penny: …this one really left a bad taste in my mouth…I’m sure Kate’s intent was to make Kinsella look ridiculous, not to make light of the Holocaust. But if some “anti-Zionist” blogger pulled the same kind of trick on me, I know what conclusions I’d be inclined to draw. This was completely uncalled for.
Ooooh, but don’t criticize her because, because, because… Muslims are all BAD.
What a moron you may have shown him to be, but at the cost of showing yourself and you supporters to be just as moronic and, frankly worse, willing to stoop to any pitiable level just to score a point.
Not to write too big a picture out of this insensitive prank of pretending to be a Holocaust survivor (“speaks for itself”), but this is a big reason why people like McCain and Obama are poised to take over. Ordinary folks are just getting so sick of the uber-partisans where anything goes and does if it is for our side.
Cue the indignation.
Catchy handle, i’m done with SDA. Been posting here for awhile?
The “planned spontaneity” (a phrase used in all seriousness by a school superintendent I once worked for) and general uniformity of these indignant responses in that other website I promised myself I wouldn’t visit – sigh – unwittingly encapsulate certain liberals’ views of how “free speech” should work, i.e.
A target group is selected carefully for reponses. “Please complete the following statement: “I’m a real conservative and I’m outraged…”
It is all screened carefully before the great unwashed, are allowed to view it. This also allows the “screener” to quote out-of-context as it suits his purposes (e.g. Ezra Levant). It likewise enables him to display the most grotesque, despicable and insulting responses in opposition to his own views for obvious reasons. Prissy apologies about the language emanate in this case from a Shi**er from Heck.
The result? Controlled free speech appropriate for the masses, if not exactly Fair and Balanced.
Wow, thanks Kate, this has been so entertaining!
all the righteous indignation about making “fun” of the Holocauset is rubbish nonsense. I have a suspicion that all those around here worried about offending dead Jews, do not defend today’s living Jews who are this minute fighting for survival.
I have been following this site for probably 2 years now and Kate is a strong defender of Israel and friend of Jews.
and as Ezra pointed out, remember “The Producers”?
Lookout: We are at crosspurposes here, but you’ve taken the time and put in some effort, so let me try and respond in a may that is satisfactory (and I am going to assume, against the odds, that you are really interested in an exchange of ideas…)-
You have listed a number of examples of Muslim abuse of tolerance. I could, but probably won’t vet each one. If we were going to be scientific that would be the way to go. I don’t think that’s useful. Instead I would challenge you to present those kinds of examples in this context: what percentage of the total population of Muslims living in Canada are preaching the kind of hatred and intolerance you have cited and/or taking advantage of our tolerance and returning that tolerance with their own mean-spirited and Muslim centric approach.
I believe that it’s the minority of Muslims that engage in the kind of stuff you are talking about. At least here, in this country.
How does Christianity treat women? How does the Catholic church treat women? Now and in the past?
I don’t favour the kind of human rights tribunals you have described and I do favour the approach of discussion, as one method of promoting increased tolerance, all the way around.
If we go through all the posts on this thread and exclude those that (and I am guilty of this)employ insults (moonbats, leftards, rightwing rednecks etc) then we are left with a much smaller sampling of worthwhile opinion.
I may misunderstand the definition of “bigot”. I don’t think I do. I have used the word as a descriptor. What I mean is this: I believe that Kate McMillan and the majority of those who are voicing support for her “prank” on Kinsella, think less of Muslims. Think that Muslims are worse than or less than non Muslims.
It’s not an argument, in my view, to distract from that observation by insisting that Muslims are worse.
Lookout: So I agree we have something to fear in radical Islamism. I also think we have lots to fear in radical born again bring on the end of days Christianity…
Lots of folks here, slick writers and punsters and worshippers of Henny Youngman, will dismiss that world view as “moonbat moral equivalence…” Of this I am certain; anyone, no exceptions, who is employing insults in their presentation of opinion (myself included) is uncomfortable with the strength of that position.
And I am sincerly interested in hearing what Kate has to say about all of this…
John Daly:
Kinsella had already introduced the Nazi angle to the free speech debate he was losing. The next step was to introduce the Holocaust angle with himself positioned on the righteous moral high ground.
He invoked Godwins law with no urging and would advanced the Holocaust angle as well had Kate sent him the image or not.
Kate short circuited his attempt to misdirect the free speech debate by sending him the image, and made him look like a fool in the process.
Hardy a joke. More like checkmate or game, set and match.
“I have a suspicion that all those around here worried about offending dead Jews, do not defend today’s living Jews who are this minute fighting for survival.”
You’re very wrong on that point, ex-liberal… I certainly don’t fit into your assumption.
A few interesting points in reading these comments…
1) I actually agree with Jason Cherniak on something… scary.
2) When people have accused us on the right of being red-neck buffons, I’ve always given my fellow conservatives the benefit of the doubt. Now… I’m not so sure my trust has been well placed.
3) It’s a real shame to see how many hateful and insulting comments have been left here by so-caled “conservatives”, instead of talking about the real issues at hand.
4) It looks like a large number of my fellow “conservatives” need to grow up…
I have yet to be presented with evidence that Warren Kinsella condemns bigoted Islamists like, for example, Syed Soharwardy and Mohammed Elmasry. Does he favor terrorism against Jews over 18 in Israel? Does he favor the intolerant, violent Sharia Law? If the response to those questions is “no”, then he should be able to, in the same breath, condemn those two Muslim extremists as “bigots” on his blog. He has no problem condemning white bigots as bigots, so why can’t he condemn non-white bigots as such?
How come Warren only seems to go after hateful people only when they’re “white”? Does he go after hateful Arabs and hateful dark-skinned racists, etc? Anyone have any evidence that he ever has? And how much, relative to his hunting of imaginary Nazis, including in male defecatoria?
I think that maybe Warren, out of state-apparatus brainwashing and delusion, hates himself for being white, therefore he goes after anyone white who sounds as if they don’t feel guilty at all for having been born that way. He never seems to go after anyone who’s not white, straight, kafir, etc… Is Kinsella a self-loathing racist?
Whatever he is, he desperately needs psychiatric help before he harms himself.
So, Warren, are ya going to Disney World? TO is freezing and the Canadian $ is at par. Could play in the sun while gathering material to mock Johnny Reb and snowbird Yankees. Ya’ll pro’bly could use a break right about now.
the only joke here is mcmillan and the clumsy oafs who drool over a shitty photo of kkkkate on her substitute penis while ignoring the twisted ego that thinks surviving the holocaust is funny.
Jeffy, pablum a bit to thick to swallow this morning? Maybe they’ll untie your arms and let you eat it with a spoon tomorrow.
This is just great!
Thank you Kate!
Classic dufuss outing!
Kathy: I think you ought to use your website to illustrate how the Canadian Muslim community is “rife” with anti-Semitism. And since SDA is littered with literary experts (see comments about speling etc…) I’m certain folks will look up “rife” in the dictionary before proceeding…
Listen, folks: the issue isn’t spelling. Is it? No. The issues have been free vs hate speech and currently what-was-Kate-thinking when she chuckled herself silly penning a concentration camp tattoo on her arm…
Lots of y’ll are witty. Great. Funny too. That’s not the point. You are not for tolerance. Most of you appear to be against tolerance. Or, more likely, you would like to keep the focus on the intolerance that exists within Islam, radical and otherwise.
What’s the diff, please tell me. between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?
Kinsella’s a victim of his own rush to use others to further his goals of limiting free speech. Nothing more, nothing less. To quote Ezra (because he puts it so well):
Kate’s prank was not an eloquent witticism. It was a blunt demonstration of Kinsella’s lack of Internet street smarts, and of the double standard he himself holds when it comes to insensitive comments.
“No one ought to use Holocaust imagery as a joke to make a point.”
How do you explain the headline last week
‘White pride’ website hails Victoria MP as hero
Liberal MP wins unwelcome praise from white supremacists for free speech stand.
This for someone thinking that maybe, just maybe the hate legislation in section 13, including the administrative process, may be granting a little too much power to unaccountable civil servants.
This is a black and white power play. Some people want to tell others how they should think. And will twist any truth, smear anyone’s character to win their argument. This isn’t about something that happened 65 years ago.
Derek
“What’s the diff, please tell me. between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?”
Millions of corpses.
Interesting to note the selective outrage. If this had been a bit of CBC satire, sanctioned and funded by the government, then the alleged cultural elite wuld have jumped to its hind legs to defend it. Anyone disagreeing would have been given a pitying smirk, and sentenced to watch endless tapes of Rick Mercer. A toronto star columnist would have condescendingly scolded people about how it was good because it raised awareness about the issue.
But it wasn’t, so dullwitted – hi jeff! – people feel empowered to be outraged.
It was a blunt demonstration of Kinsella’s lack of Internet street smarts, and of the double standard he himself holds when it comes to insensitive comments.
–Yes. Of course, that’s not surprising, considering that Warren suffers from Liberal mental disorder.
Liberals have been getting away with worse than we’re saying about them lately. Yet they squeal as if they’re innocent victims!
‘Kate’s prank was not an eloquent witticism.”
Very true. It was not.
So – we’re now conceding it WAS Kate’s prank? I no longer have to worry (cough) about being sued?
Damn. I was just going to bite the bullet and join Ezra’s Union for protection.
you do realize that all you hateful idiots are also pyschopaths and sociopaths, right?
adolfs balllickers is what you pugs are.
I can’t help thinking that this was a big mistake on your part.
“You are not for tolerance. Most of you appear to be against tolerance.”
Bwaaaah ha ha ha ha ha ha hew wow…probably the most circular argument I’ve seen… unless there is some arcane mysticism to grasping the “true meaning” of blatant gibberish masquerading as moral exhibitionism.
Everyone is intolerant or we would not exist in this plane of reality…you seem pretty intolerant of dissenting opinion yourself.
so i’m a pug eh ?….so call me a mug a pug and a thug too…see if i care..as long as you don’t call me a dirty Methodist.
This post is called,
Enriching Their Folklore
Folklore; (Merriam Webster 3’definition) an often unsupported notion, story, or saying that is widely circulated.
I do not know if this was her intent but I think Kate has succeeded in enriching Kinsella’s (and the left’s) folklore.
Now their folklore will include made up stories of Kate making fun of the Holocaust and being anti-Semite (definitely an unsupported notion)
when it is obvious she was making fun of Kinsella.
as the story is repeated to Liberal kids around a camp fire to scare them, expect some story embellishment with time.
that’s all folks!
Interesting that the Leftists commenting are siding with a man who refuses to condemn the Islamofascists.
Can anyone provide a link to a Kinsella condemnation of Mohammed Elmasry’s declaration that all Jews in Israel over 18 are legitimate targets for murder?
What about condemnation of Syed Soharwardy’s call for Sharia Law to be the law of the land in Canada?
Where’s Kinsella’s condemnation of the intolerant, anti-Semitic Islamic fascists?
Well?
Jason, try harder. You’ve been clearly able to “help thinking” in the past. Think about this: where in Kate’s post, is the Holocaust mentioned? This baby is entirely your bud’s doing. Sucks to be named WK this morning.
“I can’t help thinking that this was a big mistake on your part.” Jason Cherniak
Jason you’re fogettin, PET, gave Kate the right to free speech, you said so yourself. Now go away lest we Christians decide to sacrifice you first in order to expedite the 2nd coming.
Rich Fisher: The difference between Muslim and non million intolerance is a “few million corpses…” Really? When did the body count start?
JD, let’s talk “tolerance”, shall we?
SDAers are not in favour of hauling our ideological/political opponents before a state kangaroo court to “settle” our disputes, e.g., have the state do our dirty work by harassing and substantially punishing law abiding fellow citizens with whom we disagree. In fact, the position of most of us, which you somehow seem to have missed, is that there should be great latitude—the tolerance you claim to favour—for a wide spectrum of opinion, including that which is truly offensive.
Perhaps you haven’t noticed the invective of the Left towards those they perceive as their enemies—you know, David Suzuki’s call for politicians who don’t fall in lock step with his agenda should be jailed (ironically, that would have to include Dion, for sure!); Hedy Fry’s burning crosses, etc.
We believe that the best way to deal with offensive speech is to expose it and critique it. WK’s speech is often odious: note his latest insults to Kate. In fact, being offensive appears to be his modus operandi. Kate one upped him in his silly game and he fell for it.
JD asks, “What’s the diff, please tell me. [sic] between Muslim and non Muslim intolerance?” A very, very short list:
1) Muslim intolerance—“We keeeell you”—is much more virulent than the non Muslim variety. E.g., Did you know that the imams who stirred up all the trouble in the ME about the ho-hum Danish cartoons—people were KILLED—INSERTED two really offensive ones, which really were odious and very different from the originals. (To my knowledge, one showed Mohammed with the face of a pig. The other showed a dog sodomizing a Muslim man bent over on prayer.) After faking the evidence, the imams then whipped up a lethal frenzy.
Imams all over the world, in their sermons and teachings, say the most vile things about Jews and other infidels. Check it out, JD.
2) In Canada, Muslims often choose to very intolerantly ignore and even contravene our conventions and laws (both “equality” and criminal)—think: hateful sermons and teachings, gross misogyny, including honour killings, taxi drivers refusing to transport booze or dogs, checkout clerks refusing to bag pork, etc., —while squeezing the last entitlement out of the state and expecting the “tolerance” of their fellow Canadians, without which their harassment of us would never be tolerated!
3) Muslims are also quite prepared to use the jackboot of the state, via our kangaroo courts, to go after those whose speech—pablum compared to the poison they spout—to harass and punish, at taxpayer expense, those whom they perceive to be their enemies. If they don’t like Levant’s or Steyn’s publications or opinions, why not argue their point of view persuasively so that people will side with them? What a novel idea for the Muslim leadership, who seem used to having tantrums and bullying their opponents. JD, I think I’d call THAT intolerance.
4) I’d also call Muslim intolerance altogether arrogant and hypocritical. They DEMAND rights and entitlements they’re willing to use the state to enforce, in order to deny the rights of host Canadians, whose good will allowed these people to be here in the fist place.
5) In short, for Muslims, tolerance is altogether a one way street: YOU tolerate whatever we say we want tolerated. And, BTW, we reserve the right to not tolerate anything we don’t wish to. Get used to it.
As I said, JD, this is a VERY short list, typed up on the spot. Couldn’t you have come up with examples like these? If not, why not?
Kate, thanks again this morning for pulling this off. I even see Kinsella’s bosom buddy Cheriak here. I think the best part of the whole thing is the comments posted by the lefties, they are still so brainwashed that they are blaming you for Kinsella’s outing, and outing it was, probably the best on the internet, truly worthy of a blog award. Of course the left have to rise up in defense of Kinsella, for they can never, ever admit that one of the salesmen that sold them the “Emperor’s Clothes” has been nothing but one of a group of charlatans conning them for most of their adult live’s. They can never admit to being conned so they are truly doomed to exist in their own little “Shangrila”. I just wish that they would take their juvenile arguments back where Kinsella was taking pictures, where they belong.
All the lefty retards with their panties in a knot really makes my day.Now as a conservative voter I think I’ll go to a lefty site and announce my outrage over….wait a minute,I have a life.
Too bad a post like this NEVER stays on topic!
Hey Warren !!!
Where does the fact that you are continually being shown as a fool and hypocrite go in your version of reality? Certainly does not seem to sink in between your ears.
Warren has his collection of responses up. Unsurprisingly everyone apparently agrees with him.
To all those writing here in support of the righteous Liberal Warren Kinsella, you should go do a bit of background research on how the Liberal Party of Canada has voted on UN resolutions with regards to Israel.
Now come back and tell me that the LPC or Warren K are deserving of the self appointed position of standing up for Jews.
Don’t be fooled by the high dudgeon though, Warren is releived to no be talking about Richard Warman, HRC’s and free speech – having had his hat handed to him by Kate, Kathy, Ezra and Steyn (not to mention in editorials) on a daily basis for the last couple of weeks.
Despite the obvious youth of the ‘skin,’ Kinsella, assumed it was indeed from a holocaust survivor. This assumption based on his arrogant championing of section 13.1. And more importantly his failure at it.
Therefore, he jumped at the conclusion. ‘At last, vindication!’
However, he has a more important problem. In his supposed ‘good fight’, he backs the charges against both Levant and Steyn. Both charges brought by unmistakably anti-Semetic racists. Elmasry, for example, has publicly condoned killing all Israelis 18 and over. And the Calgary Imam peddles Shariah in Canada, which is legally defined and accepted anti-Semetism, amongst other ‘legal’ abominations against women and non-Muslims.
This is beyond hypocrisy. So, which is it Warren, are you an anti-Semitic racist, or do you just like holding two opposite opinions at the same time?
Warren has his collection of responses up. Unsurprisingly everyone apparently agrees with him.
Thanks for saving me a click to view what I knew would be the inevitable result of the individual-in-question’s appeal to “right-think conservatives.”
I’d like to think his moment of fame is nearly over.
I’ve said this before, but no hurt in reiterating the point. When Kinsella et al were leading the charge for Chretien during the 2000 election; Kinsella ridiculed Day’s beliefs in Christianity and Creationism. Kinsella’s ridicule of Day was witnessed nationwide and probably in some international regions as well.
It would be interesting to know how Kinsella would handle it if a complaint should be laid against him with the CHRC. I truly wonder if one should be brought forth.
Ward…the sound of chirping crickets will be the only response you’ll get from the moonbats regarding your last post.
I See there is still a vast amount of confusion (Mostly coming from the left end of the gene pool) as to what this is all about.
It wasn’t meant to be humorous…
It was meant to expose the venality of those who claim to be Canada’s adhoc Simon Weisenthals…the nescient shallowness that cannot tell a genuine death camp tattoo from a Motorcycle serial number is the same shallow mentality that can’t tell a Nazi from a popcorn fart….The special K cult are like malicious Keystone cops with way too much access to the administrative power to destroy lives with their deluded perspectives of anti-Semitism.
That’s why the special K kids create the dream scape of “hate”…when true genocidal Nazis do not exist, one must manufacture them for one’s own enrichment as a “nazi hunter”. When anti-semitic intolerance DOES exist in a politically inconvenient locale, one ignores it and focuses instead on fly specs.
Grant Bristow and Lucy Warman know all about fabricating “hate”. Radical Islam knows all about genocidal anti-Semitism….but the special K witch hunt cult ignores the inconvenient truth to sell the convenient myth.
It’s also about the hypocrisy inherent in moral exhibitionism…which has been amply displayed here and elsewhere with moral crusaders engaging in a lot of their own “hating” and “intolerance”.
And it’s about the morbid lack of perspective in the PC witch hunt cult demonstrated by interpreting Kate’s campy prank as being akin to a crime against humanity.
Lastly it’s about dual standards…the do as I preach not as I do mentality that will mock and condemn a Christian faith and publicly defame it’s adherents (with purple dinosaur pranks or worse) which is so quick to label any criticism or commentary other than its own as “hate crimes”.
As for Jews…this prank wasn’t about Jews, it was about exposing hypocritical sycophants who create civil injustice by reflexively reacting to false perspective.
For Holocaust survivors or victims the worst outrage you can do them is to allow shallow political opportunists use the injustice done them to justify more civil injustice.
Section 13 and its malevolent witch hunt cult have created civil injustice in the name of correcting civil injustice.
My quote above from the individual-in-question’s comment should be “right-thinking conservatives.”
Somehow I happened to be thinking of “group-think” as I wrote. I’m sure I don’t know why.
This is one of the first times I have been to this blog and i just have to say that I can’t figure out how anyone could think this is funny or even more bizarrely “genius”?
All it shows to me is unusual behavior. If i got an e-mail like that as a joke from someone I hardly knew i would consider it frightening in how far it was. Imagine getting that in the e-mail as a joke?
At best this is an example of great idiocy. And it is obvious that it is such.
Cue the indignation,cue the”I’ll never visit this site again”.Moonbats are so typical.
To those who state we should not belittle the Holocaust, I say: Get a grip! Are we supposed to speak in hushed tones, with our heads down and then say a little prayer everytime the Holocaust is mentioned? Not a chance!
The Holocaust was horrible, an utter depravity, a symbol of how low humans can sink. BUT IT IS NOT THE ONLY EXAMPLE! What about Vietnam? Rwanda? Russia? Darfur? Iraq? Armenia? Are we supposed to live our lives speaking about THOSE occurrences in hushed tones, with our heads down and saying a little prayer?
What about the Viking raids? What about the Roman invasions of Europe and Britain? What about the Spanish invading Central America?
Why stop there? What about slavery in the States? Muslim atrocities? Christian atrocities? Secular atrocities?
Pretty soon, once you’ve compiled a list of all the terrible things that humans have done to one another, you’ll find that there is NOTHING you can talk about!
So, I will NOT stop talking about the Holocaust anyway I choose. Would I make fun of it? NO! Just like I wouldn’t make fun of ANY of the OTHER atrocities committed by mankind.
As far as this prank goes, I just cannot see how Kate’s prank makes light of the Holocaust in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. If you think so, I suggest that there is a problem with your perception.
Please, detractors…do tell. EXACTLY HOW does this prank make fun of or belittle the Holocaust? Other than she didn’t do it in hushed tones, with her head down and saying a little prayer? She showed the Wicked Wizard of Spin a tattoo of a number and let him do the rest…the problem lies with Kinsella, not Kate.
Get a grip! Get a clue! Get a sense of humour!
I say, bravo Kate!
Lookout: I’ll read your post and respond when I have a moment, later. If it’s serious, that is. If it’s the usual smartass stuff that attempts to pass itself off as commentary here, then I’ll pass, thanks…
I would very much like to know: where is Kate?
“If i got an e-mail like that as a joke from someone I hardly knew i would consider it frightening in how far it was.”
Um, “David Tudor” – if that is your real name, Warren Kinsella – your irrational fears are not the concern of the masses. Have you tried an adult diaper such as Depends? Do what the rest of us do and cope and stop whining like a titty baby.
Christians and Muslims get insulted every day here at SDA and elsewhere; it’s time for some people to get off the short bus and stop the pathetic whining.
However, David Tudor,
Had you read some of the comments prior to yours, you might have a better perspective.
Warren Kinsella is championing proven anti-Semetic racists in their charges against Levant and Steyn.
Is this acceptable?
He is also an associate and supporter of Richard Warman, who pulls entrapment pranks on Nazi websites, posing as a racist and uttering unbelievably anti-Semetic racist comments. As well as writing racist comments against Ann Cools.
Is this acceptable?
Kinsella has also publicly and in the press ridiculed prominent politicians, such as Stockwell Day, simply because of their Christian faith.
Is this acceptable?
While he feels he has the right to freely support racists and make unbelievably bigoted comments in public, he wants to shut down free speech for the rest of us.
This is what the slithering snake, Kinsella, is all about.
Despite the obviousness of the prank, he gladly assumed that this motorbike ‘serial number’ was from a holocaust survivor and posted it in an attempt to show his own self-serving vindication.
The fact of the matter is, how can he be vindicated from his outright support and championing of anti-Semetic racists? How can anybody show support for the bigot, Kinsella, when he publicly derides a politician, simply because he is a Christian? At the very least, how can anybody take this person’s side when he holds two opposing viewpoints at the same time?
The question remains, is Warren Kinsella a racist bigot? And if it takes something like this to force his unsavoury, racist and bigoted actions and statements into the spotlight, then so be it.
I almost felt bad because it was like clubbing a baby seal. Actually, it was different than that. It was like giving a baby seal a club and watching it beat itself…
You can read the e-mail exchange between “Eitan” and Kinsella here: http://no-libs.com/?p=2129
“Now their folklore will include made up stories of Kate making fun of the Holocaust”
It does seem to fit in nicely with Kate’s documented bigotry towards native people, blacks, arabs and muslims.
Kind of like…y’know…a pattern?…a trend..a Leitmotiv? (that’s German), if you will.
“frightening in how far it was”
Grover, on Sesame Street, doing his “Near” and “Far” schtick must have been unbearably life altering for you Dave.
Fear NOT those radical muppets Dave, we are “near”.
Eeyore, bravo. Exactly what I was thinking.
Some perspective….
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/books/2003673065_myholocaust22.html?syndication=rss
… and some humour to offend everyone…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python
Comments reposted at http://www.warrenkinsella.com:
• Sandy [Crux-of-the-Matter]: As a Blogging Tory and a slightly to the right thinker, I am appalled at what Kate at Small Dead Animals has done. Right or left thinking has absolutely nothing to do with being a racist or making light of the Holocaust. Or, at least it shouldn’t. What possible gain can anyone get at trying to make a fool out of a fellow blogger — no matter what our political differences? While someone may disagree with WK from time to time, and I do regularly, why on earth in the name of good taste and decency, is it necessary to embark on some kind of gotcha operation like this? When I was in barely out of my teens, during 1961, I spend some time studying in Toronto. I had a flat in a house where the woman of the house was in Israel for most of the year I was there. Both she and her husband had numbers on their arms. Their story was horrendous and yet they survived with grace and dignity. She was away because she was a witness at the trial of Adolf Eichmann. No, there is nothing funny or satirical in what Kate did. For shame!
• Ezra Levant: Kate’s is not a prank I would have done. I’ve been to Yad Vashem too often to be irreverent about tattoos on Holocaust survivors. I’ll grant Kinsella that it was humour in questionable taste.
• A.L. Wudrick: Kate made a joke in extremely bad taste. I don’t find it funny at all. I think she’s making light of a serious factual historical tragedy. I think it’s insulting to Jews, and shows poor judgment. It suggests she’s more interested in making Warren Kinsella look stupid than demonstrating she has any compassion for survivors of the Holocaust.
• Damian Penny: …this one really left a bad taste in my mouth…I’m sure Kate’s intent was to make Kinsella look ridiculous, not to make light of the Holocaust. But if some “anti-Zionist” blogger pulled the same kind of trick on me, I know what conclusions I’d be inclined to draw. This was completely uncalled for.
Ooooh, but don’t criticize her because, because, because… Muslims are all BAD.
What a moron you may have shown him to be, but at the cost of showing yourself and you supporters to be just as moronic and, frankly worse, willing to stoop to any pitiable level just to score a point.
Not to write too big a picture out of this insensitive prank of pretending to be a Holocaust survivor (“speaks for itself”), but this is a big reason why people like McCain and Obama are poised to take over. Ordinary folks are just getting so sick of the uber-partisans where anything goes and does if it is for our side.
Cue the indignation.
Catchy handle, i’m done with SDA. Been posting here for awhile?
The “planned spontaneity” (a phrase used in all seriousness by a school superintendent I once worked for) and general uniformity of these indignant responses in that other website I promised myself I wouldn’t visit – sigh – unwittingly encapsulate certain liberals’ views of how “free speech” should work, i.e.
A target group is selected carefully for reponses. “Please complete the following statement: “I’m a real conservative and I’m outraged…”
It is all screened carefully before the great unwashed, are allowed to view it. This also allows the “screener” to quote out-of-context as it suits his purposes (e.g. Ezra Levant). It likewise enables him to display the most grotesque, despicable and insulting responses in opposition to his own views for obvious reasons. Prissy apologies about the language emanate in this case from a Shi**er from Heck.
The result? Controlled free speech appropriate for the masses, if not exactly Fair and Balanced.
Wow, thanks Kate, this has been so entertaining!
all the righteous indignation about making “fun” of the Holocauset is rubbish nonsense. I have a suspicion that all those around here worried about offending dead Jews, do not defend today’s living Jews who are this minute fighting for survival.
I have been following this site for probably 2 years now and Kate is a strong defender of Israel and friend of Jews.
and as Ezra pointed out, remember “The Producers”?
Lookout: We are at crosspurposes here, but you’ve taken the time and put in some effort, so let me try and respond in a may that is satisfactory (and I am going to assume, against the odds, that you are really interested in an exchange of ideas…)-
You have listed a number of examples of Muslim abuse of tolerance. I could, but probably won’t vet each one. If we were going to be scientific that would be the way to go. I don’t think that’s useful. Instead I would challenge you to present those kinds of examples in this context: what percentage of the total population of Muslims living in Canada are preaching the kind of hatred and intolerance you have cited and/or taking advantage of our tolerance and returning that tolerance with their own mean-spirited and Muslim centric approach.
I believe that it’s the minority of Muslims that engage in the kind of stuff you are talking about. At least here, in this country.
How does Christianity treat women? How does the Catholic church treat women? Now and in the past?
I don’t favour the kind of human rights tribunals you have described and I do favour the approach of discussion, as one method of promoting increased tolerance, all the way around.
If we go through all the posts on this thread and exclude those that (and I am guilty of this)employ insults (moonbats, leftards, rightwing rednecks etc) then we are left with a much smaller sampling of worthwhile opinion.
I may misunderstand the definition of “bigot”. I don’t think I do. I have used the word as a descriptor. What I mean is this: I believe that Kate McMillan and the majority of those who are voicing support for her “prank” on Kinsella, think less of Muslims. Think that Muslims are worse than or less than non Muslims.
It’s not an argument, in my view, to distract from that observation by insisting that Muslims are worse.
Lookout: So I agree we have something to fear in radical Islamism. I also think we have lots to fear in radical born again bring on the end of days Christianity…
Lots of folks here, slick writers and punsters and worshippers of Henny Youngman, will dismiss that world view as “moonbat moral equivalence…” Of this I am certain; anyone, no exceptions, who is employing insults in their presentation of opinion (myself included) is uncomfortable with the strength of that position.
And I am sincerly interested in hearing what Kate has to say about all of this…
John Daly:
Kinsella had already introduced the Nazi angle to the free speech debate he was losing. The next step was to introduce the Holocaust angle with himself positioned on the righteous moral high ground.
He invoked Godwins law with no urging and would advanced the Holocaust angle as well had Kate sent him the image or not.
Kate short circuited his attempt to misdirect the free speech debate by sending him the image, and made him look like a fool in the process.
Hardy a joke. More like checkmate or game, set and match.
“I have a suspicion that all those around here worried about offending dead Jews, do not defend today’s living Jews who are this minute fighting for survival.”
You’re very wrong on that point, ex-liberal… I certainly don’t fit into your assumption.
A few interesting points in reading these comments…
1) I actually agree with Jason Cherniak on something… scary.
2) When people have accused us on the right of being red-neck buffons, I’ve always given my fellow conservatives the benefit of the doubt. Now… I’m not so sure my trust has been well placed.
3) It’s a real shame to see how many hateful and insulting comments have been left here by so-caled “conservatives”, instead of talking about the real issues at hand.
4) It looks like a large number of my fellow “conservatives” need to grow up…
I have yet to be presented with evidence that Warren Kinsella condemns bigoted Islamists like, for example, Syed Soharwardy and Mohammed Elmasry. Does he favor terrorism against Jews over 18 in Israel? Does he favor the intolerant, violent Sharia Law? If the response to those questions is “no”, then he should be able to, in the same breath, condemn those two Muslim extremists as “bigots” on his blog. He has no problem condemning white bigots as bigots, so why can’t he condemn non-white bigots as such?
How come Warren only seems to go after hateful people only when they’re “white”? Does he go after hateful Arabs and hateful dark-skinned racists, etc? Anyone have any evidence that he ever has? And how much, relative to his hunting of imaginary Nazis, including in male defecatoria?
I think that maybe Warren, out of state-apparatus brainwashing and delusion, hates himself for being white, therefore he goes after anyone white who sounds as if they don’t feel guilty at all for having been born that way. He never seems to go after anyone who’s not white, straight, kafir, etc… Is Kinsella a self-loathing racist?
Whatever he is, he desperately needs psychiatric help before he harms himself.
So, Warren, are ya going to Disney World? TO is freezing and the Canadian $ is at par. Could play in the sun while gathering material to mock Johnny Reb and snowbird Yankees. Ya’ll pro’bly could use a break right about now.