Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
First ! Kate for PM!!
Content no longer available……
Both links still work for me.
Me too
All this is getting sorta shaky. It seems like the implacable alarmist CO2 movement.
Indeed the AGW phenomina has cast a bright light on not just the peer revue process. It has likely somewhat impared the credibility of genuine medical research. How do we sort the politicized junk science from genuine research?
The foolish emphasis and obvious exageration of “second hand smoke” has called the entire matter of smoking being dangerous….to me at least.
When I flipantly remark that I fear quitting smoking will expose me to second hand smoke….who can reliably not award merit to the notion?……unless your name is Whoopi or Joy.
Hat’s-off the the group ‘Gays of African Decent’ for speaking truth to this matter; that takes some guts. This group has clearly seen the damage that homosexual behavior has caused in the black community, especially for unsuspecting women who’s husbands are on the Down Low(DL)(see link below). You know the situation is serious in the black community when one of the official Progressive lobbies supports a message contrary to the typical Leftist talking points. Like I said, kudos to them. What’s disgusting, in my view, is how the rest of the official gay lobby is more concerned about the IMAGE projected when the TRUTH about the relationship between homosexuality and HIV is exposed; or should I say, not hidden.
This is just another example of Progressive advocates playing politics at the expense of those they claim to advocate for.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down-low_(sexual_slang)
“The foolish emphasis and obvious exageration of “second hand smoke” has called the entire matter of smoking being dangerous….to me at least.”
Uh, no, I think the fact that smoking cigs is disgustingly dangerous and unhealthy was enough. Second hand smoke is CLEARLY just as dangerous (its the same smoke), and thank christ we’ve implemented stricter ‘no-smoking’ regulations.
I applaud both attempts to display REALITY in full view. The tobacco lobby will always attempt to divert the issue, and will always try to do so through government bribery.
Ya sure. Just like peer reviewed AGW science.
And the gays are gonna stop sodomizing one another
to the same extent that the pictures have convinced people to stop smoking??
Waste of time and money!
BTJ, you really do believe progressive propaganda don’t you? “Second hand smoke is CLEARLY just as dangerous (its the same smoke)”
What unmitigated, progressive, bullsheet.
Let me guess what else you believe in:
CO2 is causing global warming.
Gay sex is safe sex.
Progressives care about the working man.
The main stream media is honest and unbiased.
Our Education system, run by the Unions, does not promote progressive ideals.
The Polar Bears are in peril.
Pierre Trudeau wasn’t a commie loving, lying tool.
Jack Layton isn’t a commie loving, terrorist supporting, lying asshole of a tool.
The IPCC deals in science not politics.
Punishing the successful is good for a country.
The CBC isn’t full of marxist morons.
….
You know BTJ, ignorance can be cured once you stop sucking on the progressive mama’s teat.
I think a nice before/after of a guy with Kaposi’s sarcoma on the front door of every bath house would be wonderful. The bone and muscle wasting that goes with it makes for a great A/B comparison, then there’s the lovely skin discolouration…
Or maybe a nice pic of invasive cervical cancer, that’s a great one too.
AIDS, not just for studs!
Never happen though, gay bath houses and such are sacred to the Left, no matter how many epidemics get started in them.
But run an extension cord out to your truck across the sidewalk, oh now you’ve crossed the LINE baby!
“Size is extremely important to the effectiveness. The larger the size, the greater the impact. Health Canada has done some excellent research, it’s a matter of public record.”
According to Health Canada documents tabled with the parliamentary committee, the department had spent more than $3.6 million on public-opinion research and other related costs …
Heh… now we KNOW!
Read more: http://www.canada.com/health/graphic+cigarette+warnings+reconsidered/3980937/story.html#ixzz18DcoG6bi
“What unmitigated, progressive, bullsheet.”
PLEASE! For the love of god, GO ON!!! Empty statements are worthless, so continue, explain why the CONTENT of second hand smoke is different from first hand smoke. Explain how sitting in a room full of second hand smoke, and inhaling a cigarette’s worth of it, is less dangerous than just inhaling a cigarette’s worth of smoke first hand.
“Gay sex is safe sex.”
Ya, that’s why I made the comment I did pertaining to the video in the link. You’re a quick one I see.
Shucks, you got me on all the rest…duh..I’m just a blind follower of all the things you don’t agree with.
Be better.
“…explain why the CONTENT of second hand smoke is different from first hand smoke.”
The dose makes the poison, BJ. That’s how. Moron.
“The dose makes the poison, BJ. That’s how. Moron.”
Hey MORON..do you understand the word CONTENT. I stated that second hand smoke is the same as first hand…and it is. You’re saying, ‘well, most people don’t inhale as much second hand’…which is besides the point. It’s still the SAME poison, you’re just inhaling less of it.
Its not poisonous unless in the right concentration. You can eat strychnine all day in low enough doses.
Moron.
“Its not poisonous unless in the right concentration. ”
WRONG! Hydrogen Cyanide is a poison PERIOD. It may have no effect at EXTREMELY low doses, but anything above that will be damaging. And one can easily be exposed to enough second hand smoke to equal smoking a cigarette.
“You can eat strychnine all day in low enough doses.”
Please, demonstrate.
“Hydrogen Cyanide is a poison PERIOD. It may have no effect at EXTREMELY low doses, …”
Hence my point.
Moron.
EXTREMELY LOW DOSES…cigarettes have enough hydrogen cyanide in them that it’s listed on the box. That is NOT extremely low a dose. Extremely low refers to such minute amounts that only a lab investigating chemicals at a molecular level will trace them.
If you’re so confident that you can ingest deadly poisons at low doses without ill effect…then please, demonstrate for us.
I read your poisonous crap and it hasn’t killed me yet, that’s proof enough I’d say.
Maroon.
These are only the diseases they are allowed to talk about, just get your hands on any of the “banned books” like Dr. Lorraine Days, head of orthopedic surgery at San Fran General wrote 16 or so years ago and get your eyes opened. There are lots of other “banned books: on this subject, but then this disease and the lifestyle has always been protected by the progressives and polititians like slimey Henry Waxman, check this dirt bags bio.
“I read your poisonous crap and it hasn’t killed me yet, that’s proof enough I’d say.”
You’re full of hot air buddy…all talk, most of it nonsense. The real maroon is the guy who suggests eating strychnine all day in low enough doses that ‘it won’t hurt’.
Always happy to help young children learn, BJ.
http://learn.caim.yale.edu/chemsafe/references/dose.html
Dork.
Again, I understand the concept of dosage! What I’ve failed to see you prove is that the chemicals in cig smoke fall well below the dosage required to cause damage when in 2nd hand form/amounts.
It is not hard to imagine someone inhaling a cigarette worth of smoke, second hand, by sitting in a room full of smokers.
Does this imply that you’re against smoking regulations? That you’re perfectly fine smoking in such places as airplanes, public buildings, restaurants, etc?
Sorry BTJ but the others have outed you. The second hand smoke myth is right up there with the global warming myth. Several years ago the World Health Organisation published their findings based on extensive research proving this. However the findings were ignored by the anti-smoking zealots and by the same token ignored by our MSM.
In a free society property owners would have the right to decide if they wish to allow smoking, not government authorities. The irony remains that sex between men is a health hazard, but one is not allowed to state this fact. Our “health authorities” are more concerned about being PC than stating the truth. So in a society ruled by PC smoking is out and gay sex is in.
As for your support of anti-smoking regulations, I repeat it should be the owners who decide. If an airline finds it makes more money allowing smoking, then so be it and the same goes for bars, restaurants. Of the anti-smoking zealots will have none of this, even to the point of pushing to ban smoking in parks and all outside areas.
It’s nice to see that the anti-science lunacy around here extends to more than just global warming and evolution. Makes the place a lot more amusing 🙂 All we need now is a circus tent and a couple of elephants.
Meant to type – Of course the anti-smoking zealots will have none of this, even to the point of pushing to ban smoking in parks and all outside areas.
I quit smoking about 9 years ago, after smoking for over 25, so I have a handle on how hard it is to quit, and stay off nicotine.
Here is my rant.
I don’t mind fools that want to fall off mountains, or jump out of perfectly serviceable aircraft, or sail the seven seas, or make an expedition to the north pole, or race overpowered cars and motorcycles, or fall off skateboards, or off their mountain bike, etc…. for kicks.
But I really hate having to pay for their medical treatment (and maybe their rescue) after they bugger it up. Maybe we should restrict them from doing such dangerous stuff, it would be both cheaper and, well, in their best interests, heck in this day and age, you could sell it as the “green” option.
Hey, how about we tax pop, chips, chocolate bars and ice cream at the same rate per gram/ml that we currently tax cigarettes and alcohol? Increasing obesity is a major problem after all, obesity rates are many times higher than alcohol addiction rates, and climbing. Think of the thinner population, the lower long term health care costs, the better teeth….
Hey, maybe we weigh everyone once a year, then tax them based on their (and their families) BMI? I mean we already know that those who exceed the 30 and are under 18 are at risk for long term health issues, may as well make them pay their fair share for their lifestyle too.
Hey, maybe an annual physical fitness test is the right answer? Fitter = better for society overall right?
Well, how about making folks show up to work out 3 times a week for an hour. I mean, so we know they are looking after themselves, after all, it’s our tax money, but the real reason is…
IT’S FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.
OK, rant over.
Certainly hydrogen cyanide is a deadly poison. But I don’t recall ever hearing of a smoker dying from cyanide poisoning. That would indicate that there’s not enough of it in cigarettes to worry about.
” The second hand smoke myth is right up there with the global warming myth. Several years ago the World Health Organisation published their findings based on extensive research proving this.”
BS…post it. I found this from the WHO
More than 600 000 death per year worldwide are caused by second-hand smoke (SHS) – this is more than 1% of all deaths. 165 000 of these deaths are among children.
“But I don’t recall ever hearing of a smoker dying from cyanide poisoning. That would indicate that there’s not enough of it in cigarettes to worry about.”
Hahahahaha! Great logic…bet you thought long and hard about that one!