When The Commies Show Up To Take Out The Gangsters

You don’t pick a favourite, you reach for the popcorn.

The Democrat Party has a problem that the establishment doesn’t have a clue how to deal with. Its most radical members of Congress aren’t radical enough for the activist base anymore, and one by one, they’re getting picked off by candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America.

40 Replies to “When The Commies Show Up To Take Out The Gangsters”

  1. Biden was getting trounced by Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Primaries … so the DNC Establishment ‘fixed’ the Super Tuesday election so they could install Obama’s defacto 3rd Term.

    The DNC Est. Installed their own candidate rather than have a communist candidate get trounced by Trump. As it turned out, they STILL needed to cheat and steal the election from Trump.

    The Bernie voters remember, and they’re here for retribution. Payback’s a bitch. Eh, bitches?

    1. Low voter turnout is designed by the Left
      who cheat unchallenged so often 90% of We The People are effectively dis-enfranchised,
      with few real choices outside the Uni-Party.

      But the Uni-Party is being exterminated from both sides right in front of our eyes;
      rinos simply being primaried and (rich) commie kids are all hammer no sickle.

      Show me a poor pinko and I’ll show you a fired government “worker” who upset The Party.

      The future of the west is Bright.
      God bless the true American voter.

      1. Except those in California, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Maine, Massachusets, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Minnisota etc. Did I miss anyone? The dems will win the next election with support real or imagined. and if it is imagined support like the kind that put Biden into officer the Reps, with all their guns and ammo will do nothing. Gavin Newsome will probably be the next American resident.

        1. When America becomes a supermajority Democrat government with Newsom at the puppet helm … it’s OVER for the US. They’ll change our Constition to ensure their ONE Party rule lasts forever.

      2. I forgot Virginia on that list, which recently decided that in the next election all their state’s electoral college votes will support the party which wins the national popular vote ( which they will ensure happens since they’re the people who will count the vote) which disenfranchises the states voters and annuls the electoral collage. They are apparently the second state to do this.

        1. There is no chance that those popular vote agreements do not get ruled unconstitutional if they are finally implemented.

          Not only do those types are those types of agreements between states unconstitutional, voters in one state would have standing to sue over their vote being counted equally with people from other states who have more liberal voting rules.

    1. We’ll see if the level heads show up for the mid-terms. Traditionally they do not.
      Are the times interesting? Maybe people are too busy living to notice.

      1. l have the unique, to me anyway, vantaage of having sloughed off my last house ergo NO need for 100s hours maintenance etc. AND retired ie lots of time on my hands for browsing and discussing.
        lm kinda scared. we just found out the bioweapons labs are going full tilt, videos pointing out ‘what do we do when the benchmark currency $US crashes?’ and the nagging vague at first feelings l get when things fly apart around me.
        personally lm kinda set up ok, lm now staying with a dear friend trustworthy but a little naive and bullheaded but at least open to hearing suggestions, l grant him that. we’re a good team.

        lve given up on the post national state. availing itself of MAiD like this. l hung the Cdn flag across the front of my place for Canaduh Day last time maybe 3 years ago. cant even find it now.
        not looking either

    1. my academic lilt tells me a rigorous time consuming analysis would tell us the precise steps and strategies by which the commies took over the Democrats, by which, for instance, it was the logical choice to target right from the start.
      because IMHO we are seeing it live in front of us, on CNN, X, al jazeera, congressional hearings, courts, California’s cities, NYC etc etc

  2. The Republicans are vulnerable in this fall’s midterm elections. The president’s approval rating has fallen continuously since his inauguration — especially his economic policies are not popular — and voters are looking for a counter balance to him. The only thing that might save the Republicans in the House is if the Democrats nominate enough unelectable candidates.

    1. The Democrat Socialists are being elected in regions that would never vote Republican. What could happen is enough socialists get elected in the mid-terms to scare Americans over to the Republicans in 2028, because we’ll see 2 years of bitter fighting between the left and the far left.

    2. “His economic policies are not popular.”?

      Hmmmm …?
      Full employment
      Repatriating middle class jobs
      A soaring stock market which raises all boats
      An economy so thriving the FED has refused to lower interest rates
      Booting out illegal immigrants who’ve taken jobs away from Americans
      Lowering energy prices by drilling, baby, drilling (except for the now-fading Iran spike)
      Stripping away absurd regulations that strangle job creation

      But right you are … if you’re a communist who believes the State owes you a living … then you are definitely upset that Trump hasn’t cut you a check. And you’re probably pissed off he’s been identifying and killing all the government FRAUD that’s been making Somali’s Great Again (Ever). You demand free rent, free food, free daycare, free medical care, free free free. Yes, Trump is not giving commies in this country free shit.

          1. Yeah….but you see, polls from a month ago aren’t worth a COVID booster shot. As the Dems start to crack under the Bolshevik Revolution, watch for them to crater.

          2. Congratulations! You’ve come around to my original point, which is that the Republicans’ best hope is that the Democrats nominate a lot of radicals.

            Glad we could see eye to eye.

      1. all true kj, but realize THIS, a true ‘democrat 2026’ doesnt think in THOSE terms (pun intended) anymore. the ‘rules’ for gauging the ‘mood’ and predicting things are in flux. as are the results of applying those rules.
        lm in a somber mood tonite l dont know why. lm gonna do some paperwork and tidy up a bit.

  3. Nice try. You were caught in your babbling and decided to finally see the light. The Democrats ARE radicals…..the moderates left long ago.

  4. …and they will eventually run out of other people’s money. I’m sounding like a broken record, but does anyone even know what a broken record is? Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? I hope this vacation ends soon.

    1. Don’t tell just tell that to the Democrats. Tell that to every politician in Washington, because almost no one is clanging the alarm over the federal debt.

        1. DOGE makes wild claims about the total amount of money it has saved, on the order of $200 billion. That’s not the saving per year, that rather is spread out over many years. More hard-headed analysis puts it in the tens of billions.

          That may still sound like a lot, but the federal government deficit for 2026 is $1.9 trillion, or 5.8% of GDP. Whether you accept the claimed savings or the lower one, DOGE barely makes a dent.

          1. do tell km have we breached the tipping point?
            let me guess, you do think such.
            (dont tell anybody, a LOT of the olde ‘silente majoritie’ may harbour unease that way)

          2. For a supposedly conservative site, the denizens are not particularly conservative. Fiscal responsibility is now mocked.

            I’ve seen a bunch of economic crises now, both in Canada and internationally. And their timing is never predictable. If a US fiscal crisis does occur, it could well be triggered by an external event — a pandemic, a war, a major recession, who knows?

          3. DOGE was just a START. Has our POTUS or Congress EVER taken government waste and fattened budgets serious before DOGE? What? Rand Paul’s annual FESTIVUS Report on government waste? What’s EVER transpired from that? NOT a gawwdammed thing except humorous anecdotes and wringing of hands.

            And the Democrat pushback against DOGE was just shameful. Utterly shameful.

            Trump tried (is still trying) to actually DO SOMETHING about government waste … and fraud. Including FIRING useless government employees and civilian trough feeders … along with reorganizing Deep State Agencies who provide duplicate services. Yeah … he’s HATED for all that. By the Democrat trough feeders and thieves.

          4. Has our POTUS or Congress EVER taken government waste and fattened budgets serious before DOGE?

            Yep. It was called Contract With America. It led to balanced budgets in the late 1990s. The House of Representativies led by Newt Gingrich brought fiscal responsibility to the nation despite a Democratic president (Clinton). Those types of Republicans are rarer these days.

            If DOGE was the first act, what’s the second? Where’s the plan? I’m sure many Americans would like to see it.

          5. Oh, you mean the contract ON America. Yes, I still remember the opposition slogans.

            The Senate stalled most Contract with America measures due to its more deliberative nature and the need for three-fifths approval for controversial bills, combined with limited enthusiasm among Senate committee chairmen for reducing federal spending, taxes, and regulation. Budget priorities and the balanced-budget amendment’s failure by one vote also delayed resolution of remaining measures.

            So … in the end … nothing significant from the Contract With America was implemented. So just a big huff and a puff … and nothing happened.

          6. So you looked up “Contract With America”, did you?

            The Senate couldn’t stall all measures. In practice (if not strictly constitutionally), all appropriations bills must originate in the House, so the House had the power to enforce spending cuts.

            And the proof is in the results: four years of surpluses. So yes, something very serious happened. The federal government debt dropped from 64% to 55% of GDP in the space of four years.

            You were wondering when politicians took fattened budgets seriously. This is when.

          7. And subsequent to all that? …
            Bush’s Iraq War … cha Ching!
            The 2008 world economic collapse too big to fail bailouts … cha Ching!
            COVID economic destruction safety net … cha Ching!

            So who’s to blame for $Trillion upon trillions of profligate spending?

          8. Federal politicians can not afford to argue about who’s to blame. They’d better focus on reducing the deficit, and quickly. Notably there’s the Bipartisan Fiscal Forum, but they are outnumbered. Trump needs to get behind the BFF, but so far he’s barely recognized them.

  5. the polarization is, in a word, scary because of the extremes its going to lead to.
    and on that note lm kinda wondering when Trump’s 2nd and of course final term is up,
    will the Democheats take 2028? will it be no returning if they do?
    layer upon layer of leftism, like the old days a dozen variations of marxism each highly refined?
    and each ready to ‘outdo’ the others in order to gain power? see where this is going?
    and will 2028 be the last year l sort of lay back and enjoy the status quo because
    in many ways simmering away at this time, will start boiling over?
    my spidey senses are prickling a bit. gawd help us. oh God help this sorry post national state.

Leave a Reply

Navigation