The murderer in Montreal has been named: Seth Hatfield, from Alberta. He murdered a policeman in a shooting spree in a Jewish neighbourhood in Montreal.
Soon afterwards, government journalists at the CBC and elsewhere started describing a manifesto that he had left behind. But none of them published the actual document — they just quoted the odd phrase from it, and called him an “incel”. That’s a term for someone who was “involuntarily celibate”, or someone who didn’t do well with women. The usual suspects were doing the media circuit claiming that Hatfield was a “right wing” extremist.
But if that was true, why was the manifesto being shown only to selected, government-friendly journalists? Why were the rest of us blocked from seeing it for ourselves?
Well, that just changed. Rebel News has acquired a copy of the full, 104-page manifesto. You can read it for yourself right here:
It’s true that the murderer had extreme ideas about women. But that was only a small part of his world view. In most of the rest of his rambling remarks, he was indistinguishable from left-wing politicians like Bernie Sanders, Avi Lewis, or half the Liberal cabinet.
He praised Communism. He called for the abolition of private property. He railed against the Jews, and Zionism. And — like Mark Carney himself — he demanded the censorship of the Internet.
7 Replies to “Things You’ll Never See On The CBC”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Thank you Ezra, for getting us the whole manifesto and bringing the truth into the sunlight. Just checked in on the CompletelyBiasedCorporation where they begrudingly admitted that the manifesto was available online and then went straight back into “it’s an incel attack” gear. Also buried, how the civilian died, but then again, I expect nothing less than world class news suppression for a billion and a half.
So who killed the innocent bystander?
I watched the videos posted on X/Twitter of this event from a variety of angles, more than a few times, and read the commentaries from others placing blame on this and that.
I’m not surprised by what’s in the “manifesto” from the killer, nor of the MSM response focusing on their perceived problem issue, that he’s an incel”.
I was surprised by the woman police officer’s resposnses to the firefight she was in. Regarding her partner being shot, and her shooting the innocent civilian exiting the hot zone.
She appears to have panicked, I can’t say if that’s a gender issue, or if better or more training would have lessened the likelyhood of this outcome. Perhaps the innocent civilian wanting to exit the hot zone was his response to a panic as well? Who wouldn’t want to exit from that?
I don’t know what the media’s focus is going to be in the future as this event is studied, but I doubt them already without knowing what they’ll say.
So basically, your everyday typical Canadian Liberal.
if the female cops gets so stressed out and traumatized (seeing as she has already shown signs of inability to handle major stress) it induces her to blow her brains out, is that a good thing or a bad thing?
p.s. make note the cops in the biggest hick town in Canaduh told me they will KILL my puppy were it to bite an intruder they have REFUSED to eject from my house.
so there is that. if they dont want me making these pronouncements, *my* rule is they apologize for the worst insult in my life but so far 2 decades later and despite the whole thing recorded on video ‘sound of crickets’.
The whole point is to label the left wing collectivist shooter as right wing, because there are no left wing terrorists in Canada.
“Incel” is also a left wing phenomenon, taking no personal responsibility and collectively blame anyone else, but the media and propagandists try to push it to the right on the basis that it’s opposed to “feminism”.
I went through the manifesto. I read the first 25 pages or so and then perused the rest. Starts out as a paper, with references and footnotes. A Sociology paper examining that “incel” culture: The present dating market, hypergamy, the effects of social media, etc. Then it goes into hardcore marxism quoting Socialist thinkers and revolutionaries. The most used word in that paper is “bourgeois”. Interestingly at the end of the paper, the people who should be executed and murdered to correct the state of affairs are neither women or the small majority of favored men that bang 80% of them (according to the paper). No, those that should be executed are the Capitalist bosses, CEOs and powerful billionnaires. No doubt they will still push this paper as an incel manifesto (it is in part) and ignore the fact that it is a 100% call for a socilalist revolution to eliminate capitalists through violent means.
I’d also like to point out this manifesto was made public (and discussed publicly) while the bodies were still warm. In the meantime the manifestos of the Trans killers of children are still censored. Whatever serves the narrative, I guess.