52 Replies to “Tell Me You’re Rigging The Election”

  2. By accessibility they mean teenagers, dead people, fake people, illegal immigrants, foreign students, people in coma’s, retards and indigents.

  3. Any and all politicians should never be allowed to determine rules for and boundaries of elections. The same goes for the writing of constitutions. Gross conflict of interest.

    2. John
      And lawyers should never be allowed to have a hand in crafting laws, by extension in politics.

    3. Excellent point John ! I’m worried about our election up coming! Not much for principles in the NDP and Liberals!

  4. No more, I’ve had it with the corrupt NDP and radical liberal coalition-no more from this bunch of loons.

    1. Or maybe just sue them into penury as is being done in the States. /s

      The Liberals and NDP are not as advanced in Canada as the Democrats are in the States, our legal system has a few fathoms to go before we plumb the depths of corruption that we see in America. That being said it is plain for any critical thinker to see that our justice system has been torpedoed and we are on the proverbial sinking ship. Another torpedoe into the hull via the election system will speed the descent along.

  6. Everything is window dressing so that THIS one can be slipped in there:

    ” expanding voting hours, or potentially adding more advance polling dates closer to election day.”

  8. There is something to be said for showing up in person to cast your ballot. Aside from mobility issues, there shouldn’t really be any excuse for not voting in person, and as employers are required to give time for this, one day should be enough. Voting is your right but it comes with responsibility and that includes making time to vote and doing a bit of research as to your best choice.
    I am to the point where I would say that if you have not voted in at least one of three consecutive elections (municipal, provincial and federal each being considered separately), then you have conceded your right to vote – maybe just for a while, but maybe for good. (Yes, there will always be exceptions for extenuating circumstances, but you get the idea).

  9. How is it good for democracy to encourage participation from people who are too lazy to get their fat asses to a neighborhood polling location?

    Any loosening of mail in voting or ID rules will create the same opportunities for cheating and casting suspicions on the system as they have in the U.S. This must be resisted at all costs!

    It is NOT difficult to vote in Canada.

  10. The more complicated and complex a system becomes the more room there is for tamper, failure, and corruption. Look at the mess in America and how the Democrats are trying to install even more complexities into an already flawed system. Let’s get back to basics, and I DO mean basics. Paper ballots, polling zones of no more than 4,000 enrollments, proof of citizenship, one day voting, limited advanced polls, limited mail-in ballots (1% of eligible voters per riding), party scrutineers appointed at every ballot box in every polling place, polls close at 8:00PM local time and poll results released nationally at 12:00PM GMT the next day. Four hours to assemble and count 4,000 ballots is more than adequate and four hours to add West Coast totals to the national count is also more than adequate. The KISS system is the only option for a democratic balloting system to function. Anyone think this is too stringent, cry me a river. The more you appease the criers and wailers the more we lose collectively.

    1. Mail in ballots only for military serving abroad (which would be about a hand full these days) and embassy staff.
      And only Canadian citizens can vote.
      Make Canadian citizenship mean something again.

  11. Hey, who’s up for making a little spending money?

    “He said in 2024 with the verification technologies available, this policy can be revised while maintaining electoral integrity.”

    All I need is one other person to complete my two-man Verification App. I think we can probably get about $59 Million out of it…without really doing anything. Any takers?

  13. Allowing an “expanded” three-day voting period during general elections;
    Allowing voters to cast their ballots at any polling place within their riding; and
    Improving the mail-in ballot process with both accessibility and maintaining integrity in mind.

    What prevents people from voting in every polling place in their riding if they are quick enough?
    Mail-in ballots are inherently insecure and open to abuse
    There are already days you pre-vote at, why do we need more?

    At least they are staying away from some of the stupider ideas like PR and IRO

    1. I’ve worked many elections as a Poll Supervisor at the Federal, Provincial and Municipal levels.

      In terms of Federal elections, Advance polls already give plenty of opportunity to vote if you can’t or prefer not to vote on election day to avoid the crowds.

      You can already vote at any advance poll, regardless of your riding. It is only on Election Day that you have to not only vote in your own riding, but also at your designated voting place.

      The current mail-in system is pretty secure and has many checks to prevent people voting more than once (either more than one mail-in ballot or voting both by mail-in and at voting place).

      Given the foregoing, I cannot see any reason to make these contemplated changes.

      1. Really? No reason at all?

        It’s fairly obvious isn’t it? Start the process of making our elections as shenanigan-friendly as American elections have become, so that the left can get down to stealing elections legally. Three days of voting? Plenty of time to bus in more seniors who’ll vote for whomever the nice man who drove them tells them. Any polling place? Makes it all the harder to confirm that someone hasn’t already voted. Expanded mail in voting? Well. No need to drive the seniors to the poll now, just get the ballots and stuff them in the mailbox.

        The lefties know they are on course to get absolutely walloped next year in a fair vote, so they need to dirty it up.

        And they’ll do it too, because read this article. Not a single pitfall with any of these changes mentioned. All framed as good and true and pure.

        How utterly disgusting and unsurprising.

        1. Seniors?
          No actually it would be recently immigrated with family still stuck back in the shithole from whence they came with instructions that if the preferred outcome of the riding doesn’t happen something very bad will happen to granny and grandpa back in the motherland.

  14. Only 4 things required:

    1) Verified Tax return
    2) Paper ballot
    3) Pencil
    4) Purple dyed thumb after vote cast

    1. Verified tax return only means you have worked(?) in Canada, what is required is proof of citizenship and that you reside in Canada.

  15. All changes designed to facilitate the kind of fraud that has come to characterize US elections.

    -paper ballots
    -ID
    -purple thumbs
    -single day vote
    -designated polling place

    Anything else is intentional fraud.

    And is anyone surprised that the Commie Twins are the ones pushing for it?

  16. Without the fulfillable threat of public lynchings, using barbed wire, protest is futile – abject fear is the only effective discouragement.

  17. As it stands now, you show up at your designated ‘polling place’ and the volunteer scrutineers and election workers, do a very thorough job of certifying your right to cast a ballot. Opening it up, through technology, to making it possible to show up at any polling station and voting there is an invitation to fraud.
    Here, at our municipal level, we have paper ballots which are scanned into the system and tabulated electronically…BUT WE STILL HAVE THE ORIGINAL PAPER BALLOT, hand filled-in by pencil.
    In a Judicial recount (if results are challenged) they hand count the original ballots.

  18. The two parties are working on it. No CPC, no BQ, no PPC, no Greens, and oddly enough, it’s the two parties that stand to lose the biggest in the next election.

    The changes proposed are exactly what allowed the states to install Biden.

    We have to raise holy hell if this ever makes it to the floor.

    1. Excellent point ! The other parties should be screaming about the lack of all party consultation in a process that is going to affect them.

  19. Clever, damn clever!!
    The proposals contain at least one seemingly positive change: the ability to vote anywhere in your riding, viz., not being assigned to a single polling station. Today’s tech should make that a fairly simple enhancement.
    Ya see! There’s nothing sinister goin’ on here; there are acknowledged instances of voters being denied because they are at the wrong polling station.
    However, as we can all see, the expanded voting period, enhancement of mail-in voting, more advance polls — all these are intended for one reason — and one reason only — to facilitate voter fraud.
    ALSO, notice the reassuring language about perhaps not being ready for the next election: this is designed to comfort skeptics like us by intimating that, “heh, we’re not in any rush to pull Librano asses outa the fire; we’re talking about serious long term reform here”.

  21. Is it crazy luck or what that this comes to light the day after The Daily Caller’s film “Rigged” is released?

    None of the ideas being discussed by the governing coalition add value to democracy. They are well suited to “thinning the democracy” by diluting the vote with those who “may” not be eligible to vote.
    That seems the intent.
    and…
    AB has an average of +130k citizens per riding, while 3 of the Atlantic provinces and Sask. / Manitoba are 70-80k citizens per riding, and PEI has 40k per riding. Start there if you need to impose your beliefs on “democracy” and how sub-standard an arrangement we have in tier 2 Canada. The Senate? It’s even worse. It’s as though those involved with setting this up were trying to set a bomb for the following generations.

    All of the #Libranos best work is done in secret. There’s a reason this is a “no comment” piece of journalism.
    I looked at the CTV’s news offerings after reading through the link. Not one item of real interest at their site.
    *Did see the image Nanos Research had for their recent polling, of having Pierre Poilievre’s support as next PM having fallen by 2% in the past while though he’s still leading by a fair margin. How many image editors do you think the CTV has who approved that?
    Just so those (like me) who super rarely read their “news” are still able to see this and hopefully be affected…

    So over the MSM…

    “marc in calgary’s plan” …

    No more voting by mail.
    Advanced day of voting by the same criteria as voting on the actual voting day.
    Proof of being counted by Elections Canada to be an eligible voter.
    Purple finger, if you don’t have fingers, purple nub.
    When the gov’t wants to nuance or change voting rules, those rules shouldn’t be in effect until the general election AFTER the next election, not the one expected sometime this year.
    Voting stations are always closest to where you reside. There’s no valid reason for wanting to vote at a polling station far from where you live. This one is actually more suspicious than the other ideas above…

    The technology for counting votes has already been invented, the only reason for changing from pencil on paper, is to cheat. There’s no additional accuracy, no additional cost savings, and sometimes I like it when the polls report a bit late and we get a surprise, because the only 2 surprises to come if this goes forward will be how giant those #Libranos balls must be to have foisted this upon us without a fight, and how great will be the #Libranos eternal winning.

    Also, is there a ChiCom angle to this? it’s suspiciously devious…

  22. I will be voting at EVERY polling place in my ridings AND mailing in some ballots.

    Screw ‘em. They made the new rules…etc.

    RNrn

    1. Heh. And here I was, thinking all along I’d be cancelling Colonialista’s vote only once. 🙂

    2. Keep in mind how those new rules work.
      If they get caught, it’s a strongly worded directive and slap on the wrist.
      For the deplorables it’s indefinite incarceration without a trial and your bank account gets frozen.

  23. You pay more in tax than you take?

    You get a ballot.

    Or we get communism/fascism/socialism…

    Every other right can still be protected by a fair judicial system.

  24. Castro Junior saw what the Democrats got away with in 2020 and 2022 down here in the states and figures “why not just adopt the methods the Democrats employed down south up here? They got away with it. Why can’t I?”

  25. Anyone turned away from the wrong polling station is simply too stupid to vote. It’s remarkably easy to determine where to vote and what to bring along for paperwork. Personally I prefer to vote at the advance poll in order to keep the number of idiots I am sure to encounter to a minimum. I’m always amazed and infuriated at the number of voters who manage to drag their sorry asses out to the polls without doing even the slightest bit of preparation and are completely clueless as to the process.

  27. Does anyone remember any issues with the last election? I remember the mis-information campaigns and pressure tactics by foreign countries, mainly China, but that was about it. I don’t think there was anything about people not being able to vote. Am I incorrect on this one?

    1. Nope.
      These fckn Marxists make this shit up and then when the opposition inevitably disagrees, they scream back that that they’re trying to keep coloureds, phebes and poor people from voting.
      Its right out of the Democrat’s dirty playbook.

  29. Strange that coming out with the hoc back in session this coming Monday,
    I think this has been in the works since the devil deal was made and I think this is the main agenda between the 2 with the others more smoke screen.
    Funny thing I was asked just the other day by a high up elections worker if I would work again if an election was called. I asked why asking now it’s not till 25 or is there one soon we don’t know about, the person got very quiet. So is elections canada getting ready?

    1. For some reason I have deduced February 15 to be relevant but haven’t figured out all the factors that will coincide.

  30. Well we will see how many people want to save a country or just get rid of a terrible leader, that defends horrific ideals.
    It’s going to take more than voting.

  31. Of course none of this is surprising.
    It’s just what communists do.
    But like any other criminal gang and their scheming it all suffers from one feature.
    That eventually one or more of the conspirators feels someone else is getting more than their fair share of the action, or they think they are not being fairly compensated. That’s when the thieves turn on each other.
    My prediction is that moment arrives when it comes to a discussion on who wins which seats.
    Now if a nobody that doesn’t get paid to ponder these things realizes this, obviously the ones that do already have and it’s part of the plan to cause strife and force Jags to table a nonconfidence vote, or just completely neuter him when he doesn’t.
    It’s something to consider.
    I mean when was the last time Leisure Suit Larry promised something for electoral reform and reneged?

  32. RE: Philanthropist January 27, 2024 at 4:11 pm “You pay more in tax than you take? You get a ballot. Or we get communism/fascism/socialism. Every other right can still be protected by a fair judicial system.”

    This is the simple and Final Solution to our problem of socialists voting to end freedom by weaponizing the tax system against those who actually provide it. The tax base is created and sustained by the private sector (since, while they might contribute to society, government workers and all government policies are ultimately tax-recipients financed by revenues from this tax base) thus when any government program/worker is said to be financed by the tax-revenue it is in fact financed by the private sector. Further, when Canadian cost-of-living increases, government workers salary (tied-to-inflation) acts to insulate from this exposure, unless pay cuts are included.

    Give Canadians a choice; government work, or the franchise to vote. Civil Servants are still required but will stop yelling ‘what they won’t tolerate!’ and begin attracting honest citizens who actually work on behalf of the society which pays/appoints/elects them, serve in a position of public trust, rather than an opportunity for personal advancement.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation