Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I’m here for it, to say the least .
I couldn’t figure out the issue. I’m assuming that it is SCOTUS on the Mail-in ballots. And, while the assessment by the “X” poster is factually correct, it is exceedingly lacking in what really is going to happen. The SCOTUS did NOT make a ruling officially. That opens a can of worms that I can’t see the Left overlooking.
Prediction: The same idiot Judge up in Massachusetts (Obama appointee Indira Talwani) will happily issue another injunction and get just as creative as she did in her first injunction by basing it on conjecture. What does she have to lose? There are no repercussions for legislating from the Bench these days. All the blue states have to do is stall long enough and they get their way….as usual. The SCOTUS will refuse to hear the case before the election as they have stated, and the current rules ALLOWING Mail-In ballots will be honored.
The SCOTUS will protect and preside over the blatantly fraudulent elections that remove them from power … and lead to their executions in the public square by unhinged, unprincipled, Communist revolutionaries bent on destroying the US Constitution and the US itself.
They’ll stand on what they believe are constitutional constraints … as the constitution is set afire underneath them.
Psssst … Hey SCOTUS! The US Constitution calls for a Voting DAY! DAY … not week. Not weeks. Not a month. Not months. A voting DAY.
Yes, every single WORD in the US Constitution was put there for a specific reason … and in this case it’s much harder to CHEAT a single DAY of voting rather than a voting … “period”