Sir Keir Starmer has said he would “never” have appointed Peter Mandelson as his ambassador to the US if he had known the full details of his relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
In his first comments since sacking Lord Mandelson, Sir Keir said the Labour peer went through a proper due diligence process before his appointment, but he added: “Had I known then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him.”
Sir Keir gave public backing to Lord Mandelson in the Commons on Wednesday only to sack him the following day.
Let me reiterate what Kash Patel testified today …
That the FBI has NO actionable evidence of anyone in Epstein’s black book of having sexual relations with any underage girl (or boy). If he did … they’d be charged and tried.
The ‘Epstein List’ is a gigantic nonsensical distraction. It is illegal to release names with the implication they’re all kiddie-diddlers … unless you have the EVIDENCE to charge them with crimes against children. Just because Epstein knew you … doesn’t make you a child rapist.
PS … just WAIT till P.Diddy sues the shit out of the Federal Govt. for targeted unlawful, political, persecution. We taxpayers will be on the hook for a gigantic settlement. I only hope he sues Comey’s daughter PERSONALLY as well. Am I a Diddy fanboi apologist? Ni&&ah Puhleeze!? No, I just believe in … the Law.
Of course the FBI has no actionable evidence.
Another government department.has it.
I’m more inclined to believe that the FBI deliberately left all the videotapes they found in Epstein’s NYC mansion behind and left that “crime scene” unguarded so that the Epstein “Estate” could come collect all the evidence … including the “birthday book”.
Yeah, the FBI doesn’t want to interfere with the blackmail threat against government officials. Let “the Estate” continue to hold the blackmail evidence.
” … emails “cut across the whole approach that I’ve taken on violence against women and girls for many years and this government’s”, he (Starmer) added.
You’ll have a hard time convincing the girls of Rotherham, you piece of shit.
Those girls all … “wanted it”. Isn’t that the Crown’s official position (sorry) on the matter? Those girls were mostly from care home backgrounds … so they were too poor, too uneducated, and had too sketchy a personal belief in themselves. Isn’t that the OFFICIAL conclusion? x 1,400 girls?
The class system is alive and well in England. Nobody gives a damn because the girls were considered lower class.
I don’t know why, but for some reason, Starmer reminds me of Brock the Badger, and his Fox nemesis, from Beatrix Potter. Read the plot and maybe see a connection between what the badger did and what grooming gang defenders allow. OK, maybe I am reading too much into it, but there you have it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tale_of_Mr._Tod