Final Thought To Close Out The Week

21 Replies to “Final Thought To Close Out The Week”

1. The left has moved on to assassination culture, and they’re proud of it.

   1. Yes, they want you dead, prepare accordingly.

      1. Well, the good news is that I’m going to die anyway, so there’s not much the buggers can hope to accomplish by killing me, other than complicating the timing.

2. Celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk is not political; it’s pathological.
   https://x.com/gc22gc/status/1966977077615448360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1966977077615448360%7Ctwgr%5Ec818eef505e0445649d8631919e84a570ec6ce4b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.outkick.com%2Fculture%2Fcomedian-tim-dillon-gives-shockingly-nuanced-heartfelt-take-charlie-kirk

   1. The left admire Che Guevara, and revolution. Revolutionary action kills people. All justified in the minds of the left.

      The left forgets that, as the “revolution” progresses, or even succeeds, then the gays, the professors, etc. are eliminated.
      Look at Hitler and his gay buddy Rohm.
      Look at Lenin and Stalin
      Look at Mao’s treatment of intellectuals.

      1. The “professors” never tell them that Che hated gays and executed them at every opportunity.

         1. That’s likely because the ‘professors’ don’t even know. Amazing how totally ignorant one can be and qualify as a professor in lefty academia.

         2. “The “professors” never tell them that Che hated gays and executed them at every opportunity”

            Or that he was a mass murderer, or that he died like a coward.

         3. I posted an online comment once to Rachel Notley who proudly wears a Che watch. I asked her how she could view him as a hero given his penchant for executing gay men. I never did get a response.

      2. Didn’t Castro have Guevara killed when his usefulness ran out, or he became a political threat?

         1. Sent him off to spread the revolution elsewhere, and then died at the hands of Bolivians. Are you suggesting Castro told the CIA where to find him?

            1. Over the decades, I have read several articles about Castro possibly having Guevara offed, he was becoming a powerfully popular adversary to the leadership.

            2. I used to own Che Guevara’s book “Guerilla Warfare”.
               Rule #1 was that the guerilla must have the “people” on his side.
               The guerilla must move among the people as a fish swims in water.
               The Bolivian people did not support this Cuban Guevara’s insurgency.
               Guevara moved like a train on a gravel road.

3. Can’t we all just get along? They cry and wail. After they’ve made not getting along into an art form …

4. The revolution also gets rid of its early supporters with a privileged background because the revolutionary leaders know that they have proven themselves to be disloyal malcontents that can not be trusted.

   “Comrade, the revolution does not need artists and thinkers. The revolution needs ditches and graves. Here is your shovel.”

   1. heh heh my daddy was a grade 4 dropout.
      who taught himself to read newspapers which he did voraciously.
      he made that observation in the hayday of castro’s rule.
      mao was being a busybody too. emphasis on bodies.
      l was early to mid teens.

5. Remember the ‘OK’ sign cancellations?

   Ask Grok:
   “Key Case: Megan Breeze (2021, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada)What Happened: In November 2021, Megan Breeze, a 17-year-old student at Westdale Secondary School, was thrilled to secure a co-op (work experience) placement at Juravinski Hospital in Hamilton. To celebrate, she posted a photo on her private Snapchat account showing herself making the “OK” hand gesture (thumb and forefinger forming a circle). A peer screenshotted the image and shared it publicly, accusing her of flashing a white supremacist symbol. The hospital learned of the post, deemed it offensive, and revoked her placement—effectively “firing” her before she started. Breeze was not allowed to explain herself in person and faced social ostracism at school.”

6. The late great Maha Rushie often said…. “the easiest thing in life you can do is be a liberal”

   He argued that liberalism requires little personal sacrifice, as one only needs to “act a certain way and say the right things” to be praised, even while living a life of luxury.
   According to Limbaugh, it is easy because it allows individuals to “look at suffering and say, ‘Oh, that’s horrible,’ and you’re considered a great person” without having to solve the problem.
   He claimed that liberalism is “easy to be liberal. It’s easy to let somebody feed you. It’s easy to let somebody pay you not to work”.
   Limbaugh also suggested that the appeal of liberalism lies in its promise of being taken care of by the state, which he likened to the dependency of a child on its parents.
   He maintained that this ease is why young people, who are still dependent, are drawn to liberal ideologies.

7. The idea of taking a working taxpaying person and turning them into someone drawing on social assistance doesn’t appeal to me.

   1. Sadly it appeals to many who have decided to live off of our money instead of their own money.

      “He who does not want to work, neither let him eat.”

8. “They don’t kill you because you’re a Nazi, they call you a Nazi so they can kill you.”
   – Blaire White