Too Big to Fail: …We find that their analysis underestimates uncertainty owing to large, unaccounted-for spatial correlations on the subnational level, rendering their results statistically insignificant when properly corrected. Thus, their study does not provide the robust empirical evidence needed to inform climate policy.
from this l gather the game has been going on for some time? amlrite?
If you laugh when you read the abstract of a paper, that’s not a good sign.
If you laugh when you read the methods, that’s even worse.
They’re just plain lying now. In formerly well-run journals too. And those journals are letting them.
It’s time to get after their funding. Who paid for this, and why does that guy still have a job?
“Nature” should change its name to “Groupthink.”
This is why science is so effective. Flawed papers will happen — science is, after all, carried out by humans.
But they are subject to criticism by follow-up studies, and often their results will be found to be flawed or irreproducible. This self-correcting aspect of science — not its infallibility — is its real strength.
It’s the scholarship that can not be falsified even in principle that we should fear, for that’s faith, not science.
When the “self-correcting aspect of science” is seriously impeded by politics to the point that a “lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.” Crap science concerning issues of public importance published in prestigious journals is sullying the reputation of science in the public mind.
There is a massive schism between how science is done in practice, and the public’s perception of it. The public tends to look at any new paper and think it’s the last word on it. Scientists know all results are provisional. Scientific papers are a debate, not a pronouncement.
Scientific papers are a debate, not a pronouncement.?
Ah, horseshit. Not when debate is shut down. Eg., Globull Warmening, for one.
Further to this nonsense, what’s the old saying? A lie travels halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on?
The MSM, [spit] Progs & liars (BIRM) glom onto these outright lies, run w/ them & by the time the correction rolls out, months or years later, half the planet “knows” Globull Warmening is real & something must be done about it. Or the truth about Coof jabs, Or, or, or…
Enough mockery of “The Science” Rodent….
“Climatology” is government funded scienciness perfected.
And these purveyors of Policy Based Evidence Manufacturing are astounding..
40 years and 100% wrong in their predictions..
Now that is an astonishing feat.
Just like all the other Death Cults and Doomsayers..When their “Doom Date” arrives and passes..???
One hell of an Intelligence Test.
Same people never understood that “Chicken Little” is a cautionary tale..
Elbows up,elbows down, chicken dance…all around.
So are the Chicken Dancers also the Anthropogenic Catastrophic Global Warmist believers?
Pronouncements is all Climatology ever had.
If you claim it to be science,what are the defined terms of this “Science”?
Sorry. Don’t speak beat poetry.
Come now, nothing beats poetry.
Climate policy, what a pile of retards. It’s not like we have any choice in the matter since the Earth is going to do what the Earth is going to do.
“Climate Science” isn’t a real science, it’s a religion. In science you have to show your work and address your shortcomings. This is something globull warming fanatics just can’t do even though they’ve got the best science money can buy.