I saw this video going around on Facebook and couldn’t believe what I was seeing.
Our law abiding firearms owners in this country are not the problem. This is. Glad they’re being charged. pic.twitter.com/cjBOVsFxpG
— Jennifer Elle (@jenniferelle_) August 15, 2025
I reported to RCMP and my RSO just last week a group of these guys at my own range.
– shooting AK-47’s
– using a banned shotgun (banned on this range for damage they cause)
– using over capacity mags (counted multiple 30 round mags fired)
– transporting firearms while loaded
– taking pictures of my SUV as I left the range.
– one of the 5 had a membership. (only one guest is allowed per card carrier)
“Two” have been charged. TWO. (Not that it matters).
I think everyone has the right to have a gun or 12, and to go to a range, and shoot as much ammunition as they can afford, and to shoot shotguns at a range with 30 round magazines, and if their gun of choice is an imported model which happens to shoot more rapidly than most guns, so be it.
I don’t think it should be up to the gov’t police to decide which guns are legal.
The only real charge I see here, is having brought in more members on one member’s membership than is permitted by the gun range, and driving on a road with (probably) loaded guns. And it does make me feel uneasy when people with guns are taking photos of me in my vehicle, but doubt that should be up to the federal police force to enforce.
Yes, I know “there are laws” regarding this.
I think those laws were brought by gov’t which is afraid of the people they govern.
And that is the real problem.
“The only real charge I see here, is having brought in more members on one member’s membership than is permitted by the gun range, and driving on a road with (probably) loaded guns. And it does make me feel uneasy when people with guns are taking photos of me in my vehicle, but doubt that should be up to the federal police force to enforce.”
I expect you would feel different if one of those imbeciles hit a pothole and shot your range buddy in the head with that AK.
Range safety is absolute. They need to go to jail. And then be deported, by the look of them.
Yes, I did mention, and you did quote from my mention that driving with a loaded gun is not acceptable.
Those are the charges I agree with, driving with a gun, and permitting members over the limit.
Riding around like that, acting the fool/posing a danger is how we help an overreaching government enact oppressive laws.
What is truly disconcerting is when certain people are allowed to break said laws while other people get the book thrown at them for far less as a matter of course.
And no, I would not go to any range that allowed such behavior, and probably would call the cops.
I am impressed. In deepest Oakland or Watts, I would not be surprised.
The problem is never the tool. A tool left on a bench will do nothing. The problem is the “tool” that uses the tool. Therefore, tool ownership should not be regulated. It is a question of personal responsibility, not government oversight.
I meant to include suppressors and 12 round magazines above too… (or drum magazines, or belt fed) unless of course you’re going to throw these at people, they’re not the problem.
Jury’s out still on if places like Brantford Ont. should be included in this, I’m having regional doubts as of late.
Most of my history with firearms was in the USA, where in most places you can do whatever you want. Shoot pistol, rifle, shotgun, rifle in one hand and pistol in the other, full-auto mag dumps, whatever you want. Go nuts.
But.
You -better- not be wandering around the range with a loaded firearm in your hand, or some ex-gunnery sergeant will be up in your face demanding an explanation. There are so many old military guys that one of them will be there, and he will want to know what the f- you think you’re doing, right now.
Playing Rat Patrol, sitting in the window of a moving vehicle with a loaded rifle? In single file like that? Are you kidding me?
If at a range you see the kind of thing those gentlemen were doing, you pack up your sh1t and you -LEAVE-, immediately, and you never go back to that range again. And you stop off at the cop shop before you go home. If the cops do nothing that is not your problem, because you are never going back.
This is simple self-preservation. We have a firing line for a reason. We have a range officer for a reason. We don’t handle firearms away from the firing line for a reason. The reason is life and death. You take a round from an AK like those idiots were playing with, you are going to die. Or your kid could die, if you’ve take your kid to the range, or your wife, some other guy’s wife, whatever.
We could never be lucky enough that the retards shoot each other. They will shoot an innocent bystander.
Not a rat kind of guy and doubt the ex-soldier is either, but the defiant staring/picture taking shit forces your hand, so to speak, and at a shooting range that’s a good way for all hell to erupt.
If ever there’s a place where people should be courteous and polite, its there, no matter what country you call home.
Jugmeet’s lookalikes can fck right off.
Wendy Cuckier and the rest of the Authoritarians love this shit.
FYI I just bought a shotgun yesterday because my rifles are all prohibited now and despite how much that pisses me off, I gotta respect it.
ah the popular fun loving cukier.
l lived in Burlington (and attended the range ‘up on the mountain’ in Hamilton).
according to the clerk, she showed up at a gun store. without proper documentation.
the poster child for gun legislation makes an exception for herself.
go figure . . . . .
“…the defiant staring/picture taking – forces your hand…”
Defiant staring and picture taking, plus loaded firearm behind the firing line? Plus Rat Patrol BS with the trucks? You better believe I’d be calling the cops. As I exit the range post-haste. This is for cops to deal with.
And if I was a member at that range? I wouldn’t be anymore. Unacceptable.
Yup.
You shouldn’t be made afraid at the range.
Just get an SKS like everyone and their dogs.
“Glad they’re being charged.”
Being charged is one thing.
Having any consequences from a judge in Canada is another, if you are a member of a Special Group.
Apart from the illegal and unacceptable range conduct, can anybody comment on the Pajeet music? In addition to being awful, it is the kind of music that touts the virtues of slaughtering others for religious or political reasons? Perhaps an independant state somewhere overseas? To liberate oneself from the shackles of opression through armed uprising? Not that our rulers would do anything about it given the political influence of certain demographics, but I’m curious.
Not that it matters in the grand scheme but an APTN news item about South Asians? So it’s the Feathers reporting about the Dots.
That is all.
You may resume your far more important discussions.
L – Michele Remple M.P. Is now calling for a stop of two tier Justice and wants non-citizens to
face equal sentencing. Since when ? Apart from Energy Policy, the timid conservatives have studiously avoided any serious defence of Canadian traditions, heritage and foundational principles. Because, it doesn’t poll well in the GTA. The CPC doesn’t evangelize becoming part
of the nation of Canada. The nation-state of Canada can’t survive without a shared identity.
Equality under the law is a tradition under British Common-Law. Cult. Marxist infiltration of the legal profession has led to abandoning equality under the law. The administration of Justice has thus been brought into disrepute. The theory of Natural Rights, being born free as a birthright, the sacredness of each individual, the history of Western Civilization(Christendom) are banned from public discourse and from every institution, public and private, captured by the Cult. Marxists. Via Choke Points, a minority rules for now.
This isn’t the first video of its kind to go public. It won’t be the last. Without free speech and a free press problems can’t be solved, not even discussed.
It appears the CCP and the Islamists now have some competition in feasting on the rotting corpse of Canada.
Some have indicated that since they disagree with the laws of their land they tacit their response when others violate them.
I would suggest that this is astoundingly unpatriotic.
Furthermore if you cannot or refuse to see socio-religio context and where you stand within that context you are by default dhimmi by popular understanding of the term. In reality you are not entitled to the protection of an Islamic state, only the state who’s laws you disagree with.
I’m sure there’s a Latin term that covers this position. It’s one that I don’t envy.
As for myself (not Canadian) but with regard to context and law violations, I see an act of terrorism. Plain and simple.
Completely off topic, but I think I may have found a replacement for Doug Ford (or at least a sidekick for him) as ‘most entertaining Canadian political type’:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BptD9K1Bu4
This is prime comedy!
*and he did bring up diversity and guns, so…not completely off topic
An aside … that’s NOT my music … NOT my people.
God only knows what kind of music will flood America during the next (Muslim) British Invasion. Not to mention all the great next Canadian (Hindu) invasion of music.
I don’t see a problem other than their choice of clothing and music
I disagree.
Trying to intimidate others at a Shooting Range is offside.
I’m not saying I agree with the standing of said weapons – I don’t – but go some place else where no rules apply and have at it.
I’m sure a few Canadians do just that.
Which Gurdwara do they belong to, and which faction?
Wonder what they’re training for? Grouse hunting?