15 Replies to “Jeffrey Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself”

  1. This is fun: https://substack.com/inbox/post/168639974

    In a nutshell: by asking the AG to release the Grand Jury files (even if heavily redacted), Trump sidesteps a possibly (or probably…) poisoned set of documents and opens up a glacially sealed since 2019 set of documents no one had the opportunity to hack.

    1. Thanks for that C. Farmer … the BEST summary I’ve read thus far on the topic. And with bawdry humor I obviously enjoy. EVERYONE should read the concluding paragraphs which suggest the FBI files on Epstein have been tainted with PLANTED DNC garbage (planted over the last 4 years) that implicates Trump and his Associates. However, the SEALED Grand Jury indictment could not have been so tainted. Once again, it appears as Trump is outplaying the Hillary cabal.

    2. And just like clockwork the Democrats are laughing at Pam Bondi … saying “Nice Try Pam … but we want the full FBI files where there is much more information”. Geeze is there any more obvious “tell” that the Dem’s have tainted the FBI files to implicate Trump and Republicans.

  2. It’s a classic wrap up smear campaign. Here’s Nancy Pelosi describing how it works.

    https://m.youtube.com/shorts/56kShTcylxM

    Basically you tell a false story to the media. The media print it. Then politicians quote the media story and rely on the public assuming the media did sue diligence.

    1. One addition:
      Once it is a story in the media, the FBI steps in and starts an investigation. This is how the FBI was brought in to investigate Trump. Hillary hired Fusion who hired Steele. Steele produced a fake dossier leaked to the media. It became a story so the FBI started an investigation. No worries though, McCain sent an aide to England to get a copy and made sure the FBI got a copy. When Comey went to see Trump to “brief” him about the dossier, he lied to Trump. He was interviewing him as a suspect, without a lawyer. Pretty much like they did with Flynn.

  3. Who at WSJ thought this would enhance the reputation of a once great business daily?

    1. The same geniuses who thought a FAKE Trump Tariff tantrum market sell-off would destroy Trump’s support and force him to accept globalism. How’s that working out for them?

  4. What I don’t get is if there is a shred of evidence that ties DJT to Epstein, would the Dem party leaders not have played that card long ago? They threw everything at him through DOJ baseless prosecution, fabricated a myriad of TMZ type articles (albeit displayed in mainstream media). Surely, they would have been leaking morsels of any Epstein tidbit to try and sway the election (because their polling had to have shown how unlikeable Kamala was).

    I suspect that DJT knew Epstein. There have been pictures circulated for over a decade (and DJT doesn’t deny the connection). But Epstein knew everybody. And it is likely that one of those “everybodies” that was the somebody that had Epstein commit arkancide. But while DJT may have more New York morals than a conservative AB gentleman might prefer, he doesn’t come off as the kind of person that would play in Epstein’s cesspool. DJT wants the trophy that he can show off to everybody. Epstein’s buddies/clients were the kind of deviants that need what they can’t show off. None of those clients can have their name showing up in the headlines.

    But hey just my $0.02.

    1. It could be that they figure it’d out a bunch on their side too. I agree though that djt probably innocent.

    2. Trump knew Epstein as a the socialite he was in Florida circles. Then Epstein bothered young female staff at Mar-a-Lago and tried to recruit (allegedly) and Trump banned him from his properties.

  5. So, if this was real, the question to ask is this:

    With all the mud thrown at Trump in the past, and mud was thrown from every direction, WHY WASN’T IT RELEASED BEFORE?

    In 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. 2020. 2021. 2022. 2023. 2024, especially, in the residential race?

    FAKE. NEWS.

    Hope Trump enjoys owning and running the Wall Street Journal. What a stupid, stupid thing for Murdoch to publish.

Navigation