New Rules

@willchamberlain

BREAKING: In a letter sent today, @AGPamBondi informed the American Bar Association that they will no longer enjoy “special access to judicial nominees.” The ABA will no longer be granted waivers allowing the ABA access to non-public information, and judicial nominees will no longer respond to questionnaires by the ABA or sit for interviews with the ABA.

Bondi explained: “…the ABA no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees’ qualifications, and its ratings invariably and demonstrably favor nominees put forth by Democratic administrations.”

13 Replies to “New Rules”

  1. Good. It is obvious that judges are trying to cripple this administration and no activists should have privileges to nominees or their non-public information. The creeping deep state has too many such associations to well funded activists.

  2. Some outlets are phrasing this as if the ABA is in charge and not the DoJ.
    Time to stop paying attention to the pseudo conservatives at the Federalist Society and all the other anti-American groups.
    The Bulwark, and the rest. DIAF all of them.

  3. That’s what Democrats do. They infiltrate they organizations, and over a period of time, corrupt them like a virus.

  4. Here’s a case study reflective of how the Bar Association operates:

    Kevin Clinesmith (an FBI attorney) pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to a false statement offense stemming from his altering of an email in connection with the submission of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) application. This was under the ole’ Russiagate nonsense in the wrongful persecution of Trump and those surrounding him.

    The Bar Association allowed him a voluntary hiatus from practicing law while he served out his community service. That’s right, lie on a FISA warrant, plead guilty and get community service from (guess who) Judge Boasberg…..then have your law license reinstated immediately by the Bar Association.

    Case study, ended. 😀

    1. Lie on a FISA warrant with the expressed purpose of overthrowing, if not at the least CRIPPLING, a duly elected POTUS. Deliberately, and fraudulently thwarting the will of The People. Destroying our Democracy.

      If we still knew what JUSTICE was … Clinesmith would be incarcerated for 25 years in Federal pound him in the ass Prison.

      One man … one crooked Lawyer … should NEVER have the POWER to deploy the opposition Political Party’s … “insurance policy”. And every architect of that “insurance policy” should be seeing their children trough thick ballistic glass for the remainder of their lives.

  5. America’s credential-ing institutions were always the weak spot in our civil defenses.

    The Left recognized this chink in our armor, and has exploited it unopposed since, at least, the late 1960’s.

    Bondi’s notice to the ABA’s certifiers is long overdue.

  6. In Canada Harper’s judges were selected by Liberal selection committees and he went along with it. The idiot Harper could have selected any lawyer he wanted but selected people who eventually overturned almost every law he ever passed. If he wanted conservative lawyers, why the eff didn’t he ask me? I know a few.

  7. This administration has no respect for the traditions of bureaucracy.

    I thank God, for that is exactly what I voted for.

Navigation