43 Replies to “Safe And Effective®”

  1. Still haven’t been sick, still haven’t died, still haven’t received an apology from President Depends Undergarments.

      1. Ditto, and I was right from day one. Four years of government ignorance and they are still pushing the poison mRNA shots. Not much value in being right when most people are too stupid or too scared to take the time to look at what was being done to them.

      1. We need the truth and we have waited almost 5 long years for accountability and justice to be meted out to the perpetrators and their enablers, not to mention coals of fire upon compliant heads.
        Bring it.

      2. You Pangolins were unfairly blamed for having cross-species s*x with those bats, not sure why they thought people would believe you went into those caves in Northern China though. It wasn’t even in your known habitat. I guess the sheeple will believe anything, again I feel sorry for the heat you have taken on this issue.

  4. COVID was never anything more than the flu. Perhaps a little more virulent, but all the measures taken were either useless or counterproductive, including the “vaccine”.

    No so-called vax and was never sick.
    Any “disease” you need to be tested for to determine if you have it isn’t serious.

  5. When the new US sheriff’s staff get to log into the servers which held this information, I expect there’ll be differences between, well, “all of it” and what the public was fed for the past 4 years.

    I expect the current POS PM of Canada to argue against it all, that’s what he does.

    My sister in Regina the city which rhymes with fun said in our family’s group chat that she “almost caught covid again” recently as there were people at her Dr’s office unmasked and she felt fortunate to have gotten the life saving vaccine but “why bother” if everyone else isn’t going to even try.

    I’ve already said if you get the next jab in one of those thick veins under your tongue that it’ll get to work in your brain-bag all the more quickly, thusly further enamouring the family with the one unjabbed guy who lives in red necked Cow Town amongst them.

    ya’ll will not be convincing those fellows in Regina that it was made up, if “the truth” varies from what they’ve come to know in these past 4 years, they’ll blame Trump for meddling in matters of which he has no expertise. In the year 2034, this will still be true for them.
    *true believers, and all in.

  7. Presently listening to Shawn Buckley, Dr. Mark Trozzi, and his lawyer Michael Alexander on X live Spaces.
    Hoping the work done by the NCI will have some results.
    Heads need to roll.

  8. This summer I had the real flue, and the Chinese flue. The Chinese flue was a piece of cake, the real flue damn near killed me. And that was the 3rd time I had the Chinese flue, and it was never a big deal. The lying a$$holes like the unDORK need to be shot at dawn , and pi$$ed on.

  9. no one at the time, in charge, would answer me the Q regarding my understanding of vaccines, wtFCUK all the mandates if, IF one had all their precious vaccines, they should be able to work, shop, browse arounf the mall, movie theater, restaurant et friggin CETERA because,
    A. they aint gonna GET sick and more important,
    B. they aint gonna MAKE someone sick.

    essentially, in the presence of all this vaccination WHY also the quarantining?
    what am l missing?

    hey undork, whats your thoughts on this?

  10. And yet to this day there are still those who not only believe in the moronic Coronahoax, but who defend the lying fascists who propped it up, as well as the poison cocktail they pushed on people.

    1. And the US government continues to promote administering the latest Covid vaccination to children as young as 6 months of age.

      1. The same thing in Canada. They say there is no cure for stupid but so far the mRNA shots seem to be eliminating some of the stupid.

  11. The “cure” may turn out to be worse than the disease.

    “Researchers observed “statistically significant increases” in mortality rates of all cancers, especially estrogen-related cancers, following mass vaccination with a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, according to a recent paper.”

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/significant-increase-in-cancer-mortality-after-mass-vaccination-with-3rd-covid-dose-study-5630488?utm_source=brightnoe&src_src=brightnoe&utm_campaign=bright-2024-04-22&src_cmp=bright-2024-04-22&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYu4qZxYCysSG%2FqYaqmlcK7N3ykoCaSoB2JASuNr1bftVyedTq1Ce2Nk%3D

    1. 1. The paper that The Epoch Times was citing was retracted.

      https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/

      Why the Epoch article itself was not retracted or corrected you’ll have to take up with them.

      2. If the vaccines did cause statistically significant increases in mortality rates of all cancers, it would cause a jump in overall cancer mortality rates. There is no such jump. In Canada, the number of annual cancer deaths per 100,000 people has been around 214 since 2012.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/434405/death-rate-for-malignant-neoplasms-in-canada/

      1. I would suspect the data you provide is not accurate. Much like the crime statistics in the U.S. are not accurate as they are not all reported in all areas.

        Agencies such as Statistics Canada have provided little analysis of the causes of the excess deaths occurring across Canada in 2022. In recent releases of their weekly data, Statistics Canada failed to offer any analysis of excess deaths, despite alarming rates of excess deaths in 2022.

        1. Whether the government should have analyzed the reason for excess deaths in 2022 is besides the point. They did gather cancer statistics that year, as they always do, and there was no jump in cancer mortality that year.

          As for you doubting those cancer statistics, I see no reason why they should be inaccurate.

        2. You’re changing the topic here, as we’re discussing the link between vaccines and cancer, for which is there is no good scientific evidence for.

          But addressing your paper, you’ll note that the Slayer author Bergman makes claims which are not made in the study itself. In particular…

          The discovery of damage to the heart muscle cells indicates that the injections are directly linked to a surge in sudden and unexpected heart and cardiac arrests, and related deaths.

          This is not a claim found in the scientific study, and in fact the surge (which occurred during the pandemic) is better explained by COVID itself, which produces far more heart ailments than the vaccines.

          https://www.cedars-sinai.org/newsroom/covid-19-surges-linked-to-spike-in-heart-attacks/#:~:text=The%20spikes%20in%20heart%20attack%20deaths%20have%20tracked,usually%20considered%20at%20high%20risk%20for%20heart%20attack.

          3. I recommend you read the studies, and not just take Slayer’s interpretation of them, which is grossly biased. From the “Top researchers sound alarm” article, here’s a quote from the actual paper:

            Given that all patients in our study experienced mild, self-limited symptoms and opted for their second vaccine dose without recurrence of symptoms, this supports the safety of continued vaccination even in those who experience initial side effects.

            https://imj.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Cardiac-Investigations-in-Paediatric-Patients-with-Chest-Pain-Following-COVID-19-mRNA-Vaccination.pdf

            There was no “sounding of the alarm” in the study. I can only guess that Slayer assumes that readers will not click on the study and read it for themselves. They’re probably right about that.

          4. Regarding “Peer-reviewed study demands immediate global ban”, the cited paper is here:

            https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982/1420

            The main problem with this paper is that it’s based on the VAERS dataset. But the people who run the VAERS dataset say explicitly that it is not designed to draw conclusions from, as submitting information to it is voluntary, and there are no quality controls. Rather the dataset is meant to indicate where proper controlled studies may be warranted.

            https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html

          5. KM, I only linked to four items I have in a tab from the more than two dozen in there. And there are many more from many countries that I didn’t to put in the tab. They all point to the dangers of the clot shot scam foisted on the world.
            I’ll leave it at that.

          6. It doesn’t matter how much bad evidence you have, it’s still bad evidence. The results don’t get any more convincing because you have a lot of it.

          7. You’re judging the reports I have as bad evidence even though don’t have an inking what’s in those reports. You’ve long demonstrated that you are a corrupt government and compromised medical community lackey.
            Cheers.

          8. Well no, I only know the reports you presented here, all of which were flawed, some resoundingly so. One was based on a retracted paper, for Gawd sake. I presume you presented what you thought were the strongest.

            I hope you don’t think anyone’s going to be convinced by a bunch of reports you claim to have.

          9. I don’t need to convince anyone. Most, if not all, who comment here know the truth, and you ain’t changing any minds.

          10. I don’t expect to change your mind. You’re not my target audience. I hope to influence those who listen in on these, um, debates.

          11. I’m not sure if I’m actually influenced by these discussions, but they certainly help me get to sleep.

    2. The data from the UK vaccine surveillance reports for 2022 showed that the deaths by Week 13 of 2022, the percentage of COVID deaths in the TRIPLE “vaccinated” jumped from 0% in Week 2 to 73% in Week 13. Meanwhile, the percentage of COVID deaths in the completely unvaccinated went from 29% in Week 2 of 2022 down to 10% by Week 9 and remained at 10% to Week 13. The rest of the deaths from COVID were in those with an initial “vaccine” and those with two.

      Week 13 of 2022 was the last week the UK vaccine surveillance reports provided the new cases and deaths by age and vax status. Not surprised.

      1. “Week 13 of 2022 was the last week the UK vaccine surveillance reports provided the new cases and deaths by age and vax status.”

        For God sake, when someone tells you something, check it out for yourself, even — or especially — if you want it to be true.

        https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

        Click on “Deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 edition of this dataset” and then click on the green box. That’s an Excel spread sheet giving COVID deaths broken down by vaccination status.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation