We are entering a dangerous era in America. The left is waging lawfare with the implicit message to political opponents: either keep quiet or suffer the consequences. – Victor Davis Hanson
We are entering a dangerous era in America. The left is waging lawfare with the implicit message to political opponents: either keep quiet or suffer the consequences. – Victor Davis Hanson
“We are entering a dangerous era in America.”
Entering? Or Deeply Immersed?
Even the name for it is corrupted. Lawfare? There’s nothing lawful about this. They’re criminals, plain and simple.
Oh its justice all right.
There is nothing you can write or say to convince them otherwise.
If you tell them Trump is being treated unfairly or unjustly or illegally, they’ll say, “Good.”
If he was offed like Gaddafi they’d say they enjoyed watching it.
You don’t reason or appeal to these people.
What you do is what you do when the warm civil war goes hot.
And you ensure you’re scorching the earth as you do it.
And know that They feel exactly the same way and will do the same if They can.
I’m not advocating, just pointing out the painfully obvious.
You are 100% correct in your analysis Buddy!! 100%
Seconded. There’s no common ground any more.
One group continues to think playing by the rules will get them out of the mess we’re in, that bipartisanship is a virtue. The other doesn’t care if it violates the constitution or your rights, as long as they’re consolidating power and crushing their enemies.
A lot of the grassroots right are recognizing this but there’s a very dangerous lag between them and their leadership who continue to pretend or act otherwise.
The right needs to use the lefts tactics – scorched earth, zero sum warfare. No more conciliation. Or peaceful transfer of power. That’s why, for instance, if the CPC get into power, full, department wide criminal forensic audits need to launched and prosecutions vigorously pursued.
Precisely..
Our Progressive Comrades fail to understand anything.
They have proudly self identified and are shouting out “Just Us”.
Apparently believing that Human Nature has changed and that they shall not reap what they have sown.
Well why not?
To be a Modern Liberal you have to believe so much that ain’t so..So why not “Six impossible things ,before breakfast”?
The rest of us observe that these creatures have declared WAR upon us.
That they have no “Low” which they will not sink below.
And that their words mean nothing.
When you are willing to lie,to further your aims..then your aims are deceit and harm to those you are lying too.
So they will react accordingly.
So Sad.
Too Bad.
Last week I read an article posted on http://www.msn.ca in which a Hammas leader who does not live in Gaza was super surprised when Israel retaliated 2 weeks after the October 7 massacre. When they did not initially bomb Gaza, the Hammas leadership were congratulating themselves on a successful outcome of the massacre. He did not realize that Israel was stunned initially and then had to move all of their ducks in a row to bomb the living daylights out of Gaza. Now this Hammas leader (who does not live in Gaza but in a very expensive enclave in Algeria) is regretting the massacre. As always the old saying “fool around and find out” is once again right.
Who has spoken out against selective prosecution and ex post facto (sic) prosecution? We need names, so we know who to support. I’ve even heard one or two libs express dismay.
Who among the VP picks have come out to forcefully condemn law fare? I think DeSantis and Ramaswamy have stepped up. Noem?, Donalds, Scott, Gabbard?
How about RFK, has he objected?
Yeah, no. We have always been in danger and eternal vigilance is the only defense.
The left and everything it stands for are anathema to freedom and justice. The goal must be to completely eradicate it. Leaving pieces standing would be like leaving part of a house burning.
Given all the truth in the comments above, how does this NOT all end in violence?
I’m not advocating, I’m predicting.
The way they treat President Trump is the same as Navalny was treated in Russia.
“The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living”
Saskatchewan Population is 48% native … This was written by a 21 yr. old female who gets it. It’s her future she’s worried about and this is how she feels about the social
welfare system that she’s being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.
Put me in charge of WINZ food grants. I’d get rid of cash for potato chips or chocolate, just money for 50kg bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.
Put me in charge of Healthcare. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.
Put me in charge of government housing.Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.
Put me in charge of compulsory job search. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good..”
Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.
If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.
AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest…..You will vote for a ‘welfare’ Govt. only. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
Now, if you have the guts – PASS IT ON…I DID!!!
Yes indeed.
Stephen.
LOVE IT..!!
Absolutely.