New Rules

Sorry guys, we didn’t make the new rules. But those are the new rules. Maybe the next “journalist” who wants to destroy the life of an innocent child will think twice before doing so. It would save them the trouble of having to hide their tweets!

P.S. This thread is worth a read. So is this one.

14 Replies to “New Rules”

  1. Bigotism that sees racism everywhere smacks of a first world problem. Old maids hoping for a rapist under their bed but having to conjure one up because nobody is interested enough to be there.

  2. I have no idea what this is about. I click on the links but it tells me nothing.
    Do I need a twitter account?

    Oh ok…I went elsewhere…it’s about the whole football fan kid wearing face paint and being told he’s racist

    1. Increasingly websites are reliant on X for content, but for those of us not on X it’s becoming annoying.

      And yes, I hope Carron is sued into oblivion and as ruined as he tried to make this poor kid.

  3. As someone who was actually denied education, travel and couldn’t go into restaurants and entertainment venues and treated as a second class ni**er, I’m now allowed to freely use the word.

    What a stupid ni**er..

  4. There is a sincere hope that the publication and the “journalist” will pay dearly for their corrupt propaganda.
    They in their racist zeal are still set on branding others as racist, they deserve nothing but the worst punishment, not in criminal, though it would certainly involve that if they tried, they should pay and pay in the In God We Trust dollars.

    1. I’m not so sure he will, though.

      He’s black; and if he’s also gay and muslim (what a combo!), that’s three ‘get out of jail’ cards right there!!!

      I hope, as a first instance, they make this cretin write a groveling apology prior to his public and permanent dismissal for cause… Check first, you cretin!!! If you already knew the name of the kid before you vented your bile (don’t know if he did, though), that should have been a clue…!

  5. Is being nominated for a Pulitzer an “achievement”, they still haven’t revoked the one they gave to the NYT for their propagandist denial-ism of the holodomor …

Navigation