Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Lol. Conducting endless studies about the greenhouse gas effects of keeping pets contributes more greenhouse gases than driving your pet dog to a climate conference every day.
Sounds like Bullshit to me.
“Blarney Science”, Rusty, “Blarney Science”. You’re less likey to get censored in some venues.
I read a study where the existence of the Daily Mail contributed as much greenhouse gases as flying around the world 100 times each year…
And that’s primarily methane, a far more potent gh gas than co2.
Methane is a non-issue.
“And then they came for your Soda Stream…”
This is just getting stupid.
A Fish Called Wanda was a murderer from the beginning.
Mythological climate change science fiction explains everything!
Convincing evidence that you can get any piece of silly rubbish published under the label “peer-reviewed research”. There’s lots of good science done in modern times. This tripe about fish-tanks isn’t some of it. The sad part is that the authors take themselves and their fish stories seriously.
The same scientist that did the plastic straw study?
No. That was a guesstimate by a 12-year old BC kid for some lame-O school enviro project.
It wasn’t even primary-school kid-reviewed.
mhb23re
The two mystery snails in my tank are more useful than most reporters .
Having a Prime Minister that flies all the time causes as much carbon footprint as a hypocrite flying around all the time.
Photo is goldfish
Here’s the important take away from this “revelation.” Driving a car 1000 miles does not create a significant amount of greenhouse gas.
I thank the amazing and ever dependable experts for confirming that for me.
Our cruel enslavement and exploitation of our fishy brethren must cease!!!
Sorry, just finishing off my can of smoked salmon…
The stupid is strong out there Luke.
I thought global warming was to kill all tropical fish, and reefs and any living thing, not the other way around.
Oh hell why not – Enviro zealots convinced thousands of normally sane people that trapping co2…pressurizing it, then injecting it into geological formations for eternal storage is a good thing. So if you accept that as gospel this shouldn’t be a big leap of faith in the least.
As for the Welsh researchers…just stick to what you’re good at: Singing hymns and digging coal.