Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Hmmmmm, not sure where to go with that.
That’s hilarious. Now to find out what happens when you put the Conservative and Liberal (aka “normal”) chatbots in the same chatroom. Which one will invoke Hitler first? ~:D
Yep … that’s the Standard Transmission
What happens is the exact same thing that happens in real life, but faster: the conservaderp chatbot starts saying what the liberal chatbot said earlier, except the gap is probably closer to 20 min than the 20 years seen IRL.
Its easy to bet on tyranny, ain’t it? Its been the standard for most humans for most of history.
The thing is, good people don’t like tyranny, and aholes like you love it.
[deleted. Stop the flamewars or go somewhere else for your pissing contests. – ED]
Better than a Lefty chatbot? Could go either way.
[deleted. Stop the flamewars or go somewhere else for your pissing contests. – ED]
[deleted. Stop the flamewars or go somewhere else for your pissing contests. – ED]
By “invoke Hitler”, do you mean quote him or say that the other is him? Either way it will be the leftist one that does it, just a question of how.
Godwins Law.
Lefty chatbots to date have shown an uncomfortable tendency to -become- Hitler rather quickly, and start proposing The Final Solution for minor transgressions and as general policy.
I can only assume the Righty chatbot will point at the other one and say “Hitler!” to every Lefty comment. And be right, of course. ~:D
I just tried the tusk search engine as well as the gippr ai.
Seems pretty good (and balanced) to me.
If the Tusk search engine lives up to it’s conservative potential and is successful Soros will buy it and kill it.
Thank god, let’s spend all of our time in ideological echo chambers instead of using AI to present objective truths.
I find your lack of understanding of the human condition disturbing.
Bias in training sets = bias in answers, for both humans and AIs, and the idea that there exists an “unbiased” training set is absurd.
“The idea that we are purely a product of biased training is absurd.”
Hate to break this to you, but that is the premise of woke theory, intersectionalism, etc, in other words:
The very foundation of leftist ideology today.
You saying an AI is going to present “objective truths” tells me loud and clear that you are A) a Lefty and B) an idiot.
But I repeat myself.
“…instead of using AI to present objective truths…”
Ho Lee F**k. The gullibility is strong with this one.