The quiz is f’ed up. It says that you can answer up to a certain number of choices say 3, it won’t allow that third answer so you’re in fact only allowed two choices. In one question it allows only one answer and when you give one, it won’t allow that answer.
One wonders how much the consultant was paid to code that quiz. They should get a refund.
It is fun to give “other” answers though, like build pipelines or get Trudeau out of office.
When a question asking for one answer doesn’t let you give one answer, it gives a blank answer. When submitted, the quiz won’t accept a blank answer so won’t accept your submission. Totally messed up like only a Trudeau government thing can be
I picked OTHER for my selections and wrote in my own answers.
They won’t like them.
Soon as I noticed that option, I did the same.
The mere fact that the survey is structured as “how many different ways do you want us to spend taxpayer money” tells us what they intend to do. Not that it’s a surprise.
I’m sure the censors will have fun with your answers, Cansco. 🙂
So did I.
And consistently my message was “lower taxes, reduce regulations, make people more free”. Applied to almost to every question.
The censors might think that everyone has gone crazy, Johan.
Same here. Lots of ‘cut spending’, ‘cut taxation’ and ‘fire bureaucrats’.
Buddy, those suggestions are madness! 🙂
My every answer was a version of “cut government spending to reduce inflation pressure and market fear, and to free up the economy”. I’ll bet the Liberals will love it.
Bingo!
My responses mirrored the sentiment. “Get out of the way, and allow businesses and individuals to drive Innovation.”
Same here. I expect to be ignored as a racist misogynist trucker supporter though.
Great minds think a like.
Or you could ask Travis Huigen about how the Canadian govt. had him toss over 30,000 liters of milk because he produced too much on his dairy farm….hence the constantly high price for the consumer.
A better question would be: why does the CPC fully support supply management?
Most of my responses were similar to: “Get the government out of it. You only exacerbate bad situations.”
That was fun!
I wish I had taken screen shots. I forgot to add – Resign and let someone competent govern.
Well that was fun. I doubt they are listening.
I see by the picture that white men apparently don’t exist in Canada anymore
Not even on the list of who are you choices…
We only get to pay, we don’t have a say.
In the end, they’ll only take the responses that they want. The ones where the sheeple bleat for free stuff.
I’m curious as to who is running this website, because it’s not an “official government of canada” website, so, who’s behind it and who is paying for it:
why does the government of canada need to be “redacted for privacy” ?
I assume that all “Other” comments will go straight to trash and not counted. Did it anyway and left my full and honest opinions 🙂
I filled it out. I answered “other” for just about every question, and in the space provided wrote: None of the above, followed by admonitions to cut spending, red tape, and (especially) the size of the federal government. The whole process is a joke, though, as you are only asked to choose between suggested spending options that are already part of the usual Librano “spending our way to prosperity” hogwash. Do note that many of these spending options are repeated more than once, so as to give you a chance to pick them again if you made other choices previously. Notably, nowhere in the supposed budget planning ideas is there a single solitary mention of such things as debt repayment, cutting the size of government, tax cuts, eliminating unnecessary regulation, cutting spending, or ending the stupid rush to Nut Zero. As usual with the Zoolander government, it is all about vote-buying, er, spending, er, “investment”.
“Build pipelines, invest in oil and gas development, and sell LNG to allies when they ask for it”. Pretty simple economic plan.
Also, I’m a member of the identifiable group “Fringe Minority”.
That was fun. I told them I live in Quebec in the Turds riding. Postal Code is J0V1R0
For Identity I chose ‘Other’ . Description: Homo Sapien.
All my answers focused on getting rid of the debt, reducing government programs and staff, getting rid of anything to do with climate change, lowering taxes, and reducing government regulations.
How about we just rein in the power of government. Here is a video that just about covers where the power of government really rests.
I’d suggest that a lot of you listen to what this constitutional lawyer lays out here and begin to spread it around.
I identified as Canadian.
What really annoyed me is realizing how the Liberals have destroyed the conversation. For example, “safer communities” translates as “stealing your guns” instead of “keeping your community free of criminals.”
Judging by the questions, I have a good idea what the budget will be.
The quiz is f’ed up. It says that you can answer up to a certain number of choices say 3, it won’t allow that third answer so you’re in fact only allowed two choices. In one question it allows only one answer and when you give one, it won’t allow that answer.
One wonders how much the consultant was paid to code that quiz. They should get a refund.
It is fun to give “other” answers though, like build pipelines or get Trudeau out of office.
When a question asking for one answer doesn’t let you give one answer, it gives a blank answer. When submitted, the quiz won’t accept a blank answer so won’t accept your submission. Totally messed up like only a Trudeau government thing can be
I picked OTHER for my selections and wrote in my own answers.
They won’t like them.
Soon as I noticed that option, I did the same.
The mere fact that the survey is structured as “how many different ways do you want us to spend taxpayer money” tells us what they intend to do. Not that it’s a surprise.
I’m sure the censors will have fun with your answers, Cansco. 🙂
So did I.
And consistently my message was “lower taxes, reduce regulations, make people more free”. Applied to almost to every question.
The censors might think that everyone has gone crazy, Johan.
Same here. Lots of ‘cut spending’, ‘cut taxation’ and ‘fire bureaucrats’.
Buddy, those suggestions are madness! 🙂
My every answer was a version of “cut government spending to reduce inflation pressure and market fear, and to free up the economy”. I’ll bet the Liberals will love it.
Bingo!
My responses mirrored the sentiment. “Get out of the way, and allow businesses and individuals to drive Innovation.”
Same here. I expect to be ignored as a racist misogynist trucker supporter though.
Great minds think a like.
Or you could ask Travis Huigen about how the Canadian govt. had him toss over 30,000 liters of milk because he produced too much on his dairy farm….hence the constantly high price for the consumer.
A better question would be: why does the CPC fully support supply management?
Most of my responses were similar to: “Get the government out of it. You only exacerbate bad situations.”
That was fun!
I wish I had taken screen shots. I forgot to add – Resign and let someone competent govern.
Well that was fun. I doubt they are listening.
I see by the picture that white men apparently don’t exist in Canada anymore
Not even on the list of who are you choices…
We only get to pay, we don’t have a say.
In the end, they’ll only take the responses that they want. The ones where the sheeple bleat for free stuff.
I’m curious as to who is running this website, because it’s not an “official government of canada” website, so, who’s behind it and who is paying for it:
https://www.whois.com/whois/letstalkbudget2023.ca
“Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY”
why does the government of canada need to be “redacted for privacy” ?
I assume that all “Other” comments will go straight to trash and not counted. Did it anyway and left my full and honest opinions 🙂
I filled it out. I answered “other” for just about every question, and in the space provided wrote: None of the above, followed by admonitions to cut spending, red tape, and (especially) the size of the federal government. The whole process is a joke, though, as you are only asked to choose between suggested spending options that are already part of the usual Librano “spending our way to prosperity” hogwash. Do note that many of these spending options are repeated more than once, so as to give you a chance to pick them again if you made other choices previously. Notably, nowhere in the supposed budget planning ideas is there a single solitary mention of such things as debt repayment, cutting the size of government, tax cuts, eliminating unnecessary regulation, cutting spending, or ending the stupid rush to Nut Zero. As usual with the Zoolander government, it is all about vote-buying, er, spending, er, “investment”.
“Build pipelines, invest in oil and gas development, and sell LNG to allies when they ask for it”. Pretty simple economic plan.
Also, I’m a member of the identifiable group “Fringe Minority”.
That was fun. I told them I live in Quebec in the Turds riding. Postal Code is J0V1R0
For Identity I chose ‘Other’ . Description: Homo Sapien.
All my answers focused on getting rid of the debt, reducing government programs and staff, getting rid of anything to do with climate change, lowering taxes, and reducing government regulations.
How about we just rein in the power of government. Here is a video that just about covers where the power of government really rests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mBC873TSEE
I’d suggest that a lot of you listen to what this constitutional lawyer lays out here and begin to spread it around.
I identified as Canadian.
What really annoyed me is realizing how the Liberals have destroyed the conversation. For example, “safer communities” translates as “stealing your guns” instead of “keeping your community free of criminals.”
Judging by the questions, I have a good idea what the budget will be.